Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sandy Hawley Community Service Award - Knowledge

Source 📝

416:. The OSHOF is a volunteer, non-profit organization that is dedicated to preserving the history and feats of athletes within our province for the future generations. We don't have a charitable status nor do we receive any funding from the government at any level. All Board of Directors and committee members are volunteers. We don't receive any compensation and often times we pay out of pocket to manage small expenses. In fact, to preserve and honour what we set out to achieve, all volunteers (including me) pay for the tickets to our own events. As the director of marketing, it's my role to educate and embrace the younger people of Ontario on the achievements of our athletes - this often involves engaging audiences online (social media, wikipedia, and more). I can assure you this is a legitimate organization that has been operating since 1995 (I was born in 1990 so it's almost a lifetime lol). 496:
In my view, COI problems are much less when the organization is nonprofit and the editor(s) are volunteers. Cbl62 and me are volunteers here, by the way. But still you have to understand that Knowledge does have to have policy/guidelines about COI because wikipedia is otherwise over-run by COI editors, including paid editors (not the case here). --
486:(OSHOF) or to a new section in it. The award is a program of OSHOF. The current award article and the current OSHOF article are both short. If OSHOF is worth covering, and if the award is an important program of it, then it can be mentioned there. A redirect from the award to the organization can be left behind. 495:
used to be explicit in saying that a person with COI can edit, although they should be responsible, and they should defer to non-involved editors in the event of any conflict over content (e.g. they could make suggestions for article changes at the Talk page, but leave the implementation to others).
388:
The sources you mention may constitute significant coverage of the OSHOF, but they do not constitute significant coverage of the Hawley Award. The references given merely contain passing reference to the Hawley Award. Such passing references are insufficient under GNG to support a stand-alone
346:
Hi Cbl62, I apologize for the late reply to your comment as I'm just learning how to use the "talk" section on Knowledge. Although you may believe there is not significant coverage in multiple, reliable and independent sources to warrant the
171: 206:
in that there is not significant coverage in multiple, reliable and independent sources. The current sourcing is not independent, as it is from the organization that grants the award. The article also appears to raise
369:
to start as the articles were written in 2013, 2015, 2016 respectively. I agree with you that there is not much coverage from independent sources but I believe there is sufficient mention of the award to meet
430:
The issue is not whether or not OSHOF is a legitimate organization. The issue is your conflict as OSHOF marketing director in editing articles concerning OSHOF. You need to familiarize yourself with
165: 278: 97: 92: 219:, an editor whose edits since 2014 relate principally to the OSHOF. Interestingly, the user name is very close to the name of the OSHOF's director of marketing and board member. See 101: 84: 255: 124: 131: 319: 299: 367: 88: 186: 153: 348: 80: 72: 512: 472: 444: 425: 398: 383: 331: 311: 290: 271: 236: 66: 147: 143: 17: 208: 193: 507: 483: 413: 212: 51: 455: 159: 531: 40: 412:
With regards to your concern that there is a conflict of interest. Allow me to provide some background on the
361: 327: 307: 527: 36: 263: 247: 417: 375: 216: 421: 379: 352: 179: 251: 502: 323: 303: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
526:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
364: 440: 394: 286: 259: 232: 224: 61: 492: 432: 371: 203: 355: 497: 466: 118: 358: 436: 407: 390: 341: 282: 228: 57: 520:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
220: 279:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Brian Williams Media Award
114: 110: 106: 178: 464:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 351:article, I would recommend checking these sources: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 534:). No further edits should be made to this page. 374:standards. Please correct me if I am mistaken. 256:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29 491:About COI, the Knowledge policy/guideline at 192: 8: 318:Note: This debate has been included in the 298:Note: This debate has been included in the 320:list of Sports-related deletion discussions 300:list of Canada-related deletion discussions 317: 297: 7: 349:Sandy Hawley Community Service Award 81:Sandy Hawley Community Service Award 73:Sandy Hawley Community Service Award 215:-related articles were created by 24: 435:and its disclosure obligations. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 277:A related AfD can be found at 209:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 1: 254:). I have transcluded it to 202:This award does not satisfy 484:Ontario Sports Hall of Fame 414:Ontario Sports Hall of Fame 246:This AfD was not correctly 213:Ontario Sports Hall of Fame 52:Ontario Sports Hall of Fame 551: 67:12:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) 523:Please do not modify it. 513:20:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC) 473:01:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC) 445:05:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC) 426:05:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC) 399:05:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC) 384:05:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC) 332:09:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 312:09:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 291:01:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 272:00:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 237:00:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 211:problems. Most of the 353:Toronto Maple Leafs 244:Automated comment: 475: 334: 314: 274: 270: 542: 525: 510: 505: 500: 469: 463: 461: 459: 411: 365:Ottawa Redblacks 345: 266: 265:Talk to my owner 261: 242: 197: 196: 182: 134: 122: 104: 65: 34: 550: 549: 545: 544: 543: 541: 540: 539: 538: 532:deletion review 521: 508: 503: 498: 476: 467: 454: 452: 405: 339: 269: 264: 139: 130: 95: 79: 76: 56: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 548: 546: 537: 536: 516: 515: 488: 487: 482:, probably to 462: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 403: 402: 401: 336: 335: 315: 294: 293: 275: 262: 217:User:Rajeevanm 200: 199: 136: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 547: 535: 533: 529: 524: 518: 517: 514: 511: 506: 501: 494: 490: 489: 485: 481: 478: 477: 474: 471: 470: 460: 457: 446: 442: 438: 434: 429: 428: 427: 423: 419: 415: 409: 404: 400: 396: 392: 387: 386: 385: 381: 377: 373: 368: 366: 362: 360: 356: 354: 350: 343: 338: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 316: 313: 309: 305: 301: 296: 295: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 273: 267: 260: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 240: 239: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 205: 195: 191: 188: 185: 181: 177: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 145: 142: 141:Find sources: 137: 133: 129: 126: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 99: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 77: 74: 71: 69: 68: 63: 59: 54: 53: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 522: 519: 479: 465: 453: 324:Lemongirl942 304:Lemongirl942 250:to the log ( 243: 201: 189: 183: 175: 168: 162: 156: 150: 140: 127: 49: 47: 31: 28: 359:Toronto Sun 248:transcluded 166:free images 528:talk page 418:Rajeevanm 389:article. 376:Rajeevanm 62:talk page 50:merge to 37:talk page 530:or in a 456:Relisted 125:View log 39:or in a 468:MBisanz 268::Online 172:WP refs 160:scholar 98:protect 93:history 493:wp:COI 433:WP:COI 372:WP:GNG 252:step 3 204:WP:GNG 144:Google 102:delete 480:Merge 437:Cbl62 408:Cbl62 391:Cbl62 342:Cbl62 283:Cbl62 229:Cbl62 187:JSTOR 148:books 132:Stats 119:views 111:watch 107:links 16:< 441:talk 422:talk 395:talk 380:talk 328:talk 308:talk 287:talk 258:. — 233:talk 225:here 223:and 221:here 180:FENS 154:news 115:logs 89:talk 85:edit 58:J04n 504:ncr 227:. 194:TWL 123:– ( 55:. 509:am 499:do 443:) 424:) 397:) 382:) 363:, 357:, 330:) 322:. 310:) 302:. 289:) 281:. 235:) 174:) 117:| 113:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 439:( 420:( 410:: 406:@ 393:( 378:( 344:: 340:@ 326:( 306:( 285:( 231:( 198:) 190:· 184:· 176:· 169:· 163:· 157:· 151:· 146:( 138:( 135:) 128:· 121:) 83:( 64:) 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ontario Sports Hall of Fame
J04n
talk page
12:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Sandy Hawley Community Service Award
Sandy Hawley Community Service Award
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:GNG

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.