271:
229:
When it comes to direct coverage of her herself, the news sources given in the article largely comprise articles about
Knowledge's gender gap, in which she features in an interview context and is given a brief biographical outline - these include the Independent and Women's eNews articles. The
223:
A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple
426:
it tends to be in passing, or wholly negative about her recent dismissal. Wikipedians will have a distorted view of her promininence and, if she was a 'normal' punter, I fully expect this would be an uncontroversial deletion.
299:) and in this instance, since it is focused on a negative event (being fired from work) and she hasn't made a concerted effort to be notable outside of the Knowledge project itself, I think we can be within policy to nuke it.
565:. Sarah Stierch is an indispensible asset to Knowledge and all it stands for, but her notability as an individual is very borderline in the grander scheme of things. As with everyone else, what tips the scales for me is her
183:
230:
TechRepublic and Daily Dot articles are simply interviews. There's an
Indianapolis Star article from 2001 about her early career, which I can't assess as it's paywalled, but it wouldn't be sufficient to pass
479:
519:
82:
277:
I think we must be particularly strict when we write articles about ourselves. The version that I felt was most in compliance with my (strict) reading of the BLP and sourcing policies was
136:
177:
573:
clause in the first place: not everyone who's done something worthwhile needs to have their life publicised on
Knowledge, especially not if they don't want it to be.
499:
224:
independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.
143:
77:
422:, though from what I can see, Sarah hasn't requested deletion, she's simply saying she won't miss the article if it goes. Though she's been covered by the UK
245:
issue. If that hadn't happened, would she be notable by our standards? I don't believe so. This article really only exists as a
Wikiedian insider topic. —
461:
Based on the unanimous views of the numerous commenting editors, with which I concur, might this not be an appropriate candidate for a speedy close? -
330:
109:
104:
618:
309:
113:
620:
596:
579:
553:
531:
511:
491:
470:
453:
436:
414:
386:
352:
335:
311:
284:
263:
61:
17:
96:
198:
324:
165:
238:. Apart from those, there are citations to her own website and a WMF blog post, which are obviously not independent.
570:
543:
293:
639:
449:
40:
320:
159:
57:
348:
155:
635:
550:
466:
444:
per subject's stated preference (not insistence), and due to her marginal notability per our guidelines.
241:
The remaining three news sources relate to her departure from the WMF, and it's starting to look like a
100:
36:
616:
592:
445:
307:
214:
Our
Knowledge colleague and former WMF employee Sarah Stierch doesn't meet our notability threshold.
205:
407:
377:
191:
92:
67:
53:
235:
527:
507:
487:
344:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
634:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
577:
462:
231:
171:
609:
588:
587:
per the stated preference of the subject and lack of any pressing reasons to keep this. --
432:
300:
270:
256:
242:
215:
605:
395:
361:
281:
523:
503:
483:
130:
280:. I don't claim to be an authority over English Knowledge BLP policies though. --
222:
574:
562:
428:
246:
604:
I think any admin would be perfectly within their rights to delete this per
561:— Ultimately, I agree with everything outlined in the above nomination by
569:
for deletion. This is the kind of case that reminds us why we have the
296:- the subject has said they would welcome the article to be deleted, (
628:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
480:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
520:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
566:
547:
297:
278:
126:
122:
118:
190:
83:
Articles for deletion/Sarah
Stierch (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
642:). No further edits should be made to this page.
500:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
343:Effectively argued from several perspectives
204:
8:
518:Note: This debate has been included in the
498:Note: This debate has been included in the
478:Note: This debate has been included in the
517:
497:
477:
52:. No point in dragging this out longer. —
75:
7:
78:Articles for deletion/Sarah Stierch
74:
24:
269:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
659:
621:11:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
608:given the above comments.
597:10:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
580:07:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
554:06:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
532:01:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
512:01:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
492:01:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
471:23:00, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
454:16:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
437:07:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
415:02:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
387:00:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
353:22:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
336:21:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
312:20:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
285:18:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
264:15:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
62:21:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
631:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
394:as she'd agreed on it.
73:AfDs for this article:
360:per Sarahs request. -
319:per Sarah's request.
567:expressed preference
544:WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE
294:WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE
459:Delete and Comment
48:The result was
534:
514:
494:
334:
650:
633:
614:
412:
405:
400:
384:
375:
368:
328:
305:
273:
260:
255:
250:
225:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
34:
658:
657:
653:
652:
651:
649:
648:
647:
646:
640:deletion review
629:
610:
446:Mercurywoodrose
408:
401:
396:
378:
369:
362:
301:
258:
253:
248:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
656:
654:
645:
644:
624:
623:
599:
582:
556:
546:, relative to
536:
535:
515:
495:
474:
473:
456:
439:
417:
389:
355:
338:
314:
287:
227:
226:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
54:David Eppstein
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
655:
643:
641:
637:
632:
626:
625:
622:
619:
617:
615:
613:
607:
603:
600:
598:
594:
590:
586:
583:
581:
578:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
557:
555:
552:
548:
545:
541:
538:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
516:
513:
509:
505:
501:
496:
493:
489:
485:
481:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
438:
434:
430:
425:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
406:
404:
399:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
382:
381:→Talk to me!→
376:
374:
373:
367:
366:
359:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
337:
332:
327:
326:
322:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
306:
304:
298:
295:
291:
288:
286:
283:
279:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
261:
252:
251:
244:
239:
237:
233:
221:
220:
219:
218:states that:
217:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:Sarah Stierch
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
68:Sarah Stierch
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
630:
627:
611:
601:
584:
558:
551:NorthAmerica
539:
458:
441:
423:
419:
409:
402:
397:
391:
380:
379:
371:
370:
364:
363:
357:
345:FeatherPluma
340:
323:
316:
302:
289:
274:
257:
247:
240:
228:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
463:Ad Orientem
424:Independent
236:WP:CREATIVE
178:free images
612:Ritchie333
589:Randykitty
325:Antarctica
303:Ritchie333
636:talk page
524:• Gene93k
504:• Gene93k
484:• Gene93k
232:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
638:or in a
321:Northern
275:Comment:
243:WP:BLP1E
216:WP:BASIC
137:View log
39:or in a
606:WP:SNOW
602:Comment
398:///Euro
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
585:Delete
575:Kurtis
559:Delete
540:Delete
442:Delete
420:Delete
392:Delete
365:→Davey
358:Delete
341:Delete
317:Delete
290:Delete
156:Google
114:delete
50:delete
571:BLPRD
563:Scott
429:Sionk
372:2010→
249:Scott
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
593:talk
542:per
528:talk
508:talk
488:talk
467:talk
450:talk
433:talk
349:talk
292:per
282:Nemo
259:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
403:Car
234:or
206:TWL
135:– (
595:)
549:.
530:)
522:.
510:)
502:.
490:)
482:.
469:)
452:)
435:)
410:GT
351:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
591:(
526:(
506:(
486:(
465:(
448:(
431:(
347:(
333:)
331:₵
329:(
254:•
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.