200:
The article is overly promotional and biased with no encyclopaedic content. It is based on the opinions of others. The bias starts right at the lead section. And the supporting paragraph is very short and almost absent. The article has no fundamental encyclopaedic components such as the history
201:
section or actors, rather, it is based on a student's point of view. This article is like a discussion essay that talks about the article in a different way that an encyclopaedia does. The article rarely talks about the topic in general as well. The article was
248:). In its current form, this article is a creative, not a neutral, well-referenced, encyclopaedic article. If some secondary source that discuss the phrase extensively can be found, the article could be kept. I haven't been able to find them.
169:
316:. Recognized, widely-discussed modern social issue, with no shortage of scholarly articles nor books from reliable publishers. The current article needs a lot of work, but this isn't blow-up-and-start-over bad.
515:
163:
468:
today. Almost every current college CJ textbook has a section on the topic; literally thousands of scholarly articles have been written on the topic in recent years. Please read
122:
537:
559:
95:
90:
129:
99:
82:
443:- sufficient sources to satisfy at least the GNG. POV is solid grounds for a rewrite and maybe even some cutting of text/sources, but not deletion. —
243:
267:
Actually a very good article, for the editorial page of a newspaper but not for an encyclopedia. Written to promote policy so violates
184:
151:
17:
231:. Many of the sources have only a tangential/passing reference to the subject of the article without discussing it in detail (e.g.
86:
53:
145:
573:
551:
529:
506:
489:
452:
435:
418:
399:
325:
321:
308:
279:
257:
217:
64:
414:
591:
40:
227:. Possibly an policy-compliant article could be written, but this isn't it. The first and most significant problem is
141:
299:
available that can be added to the article as it is rewritten over time. Fix it, don't just completely remove it.--
287:
This is a long-standing article that has existed since 2011, and the subject is certainly notable (judging from a
395:
191:
78:
70:
292:
317:
234:
477:
288:
410:
246:
387:
304:
253:
383:
587:
563:
541:
519:
36:
296:
157:
391:
445:
177:
469:
232:
295:). That being said, it does need some work to comply with NPOV policies, and there appears to be
58:
485:
409:
S-to-P Pipeline is a notable topic. The article should be improved, but shouldn't be deleted.
300:
249:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
586:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
382:
We should learn a lesson from such critiques of the zero-tolerance approach. Please see our
237:
202:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
502:
465:
431:
275:
473:
268:
228:
240:
209:
481:
116:
498:
461:
427:
271:
376:
Education as
Enforcement: The Militarization and Corporatization of Schools
351:
From
Education to Incarceration: Dismantling the School-To-Prison Pipeline
333:
The topic is quite notable as there are several books about it including:
208:
If the deletion discussion fails, I would recommend a complete rewrite.
371:
Right to Be
Hostile: Schools, Prisons, and the Making of Public Enemies
356:
Transforming the School-to-Prison
Pipeline: Lessons from the Classroom
205:
recently, so I am writing this deletion discussion to cope with this.
580:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
516:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
460:. One of the most notable and controversial topics in
366:
Lockdown High: When the
Schoolhouse Becomes a Jailhouse
341:
The School-to-Prison
Pipeline: Structuring Legal Reform
112:
108:
104:
176:
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
594:). No further edits should be made to this page.
478:We are not going to remove controversial topics
8:
558:Note: This debate has been included in the
538:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
536:Note: This debate has been included in the
514:Note: This debate has been included in the
361:Deconstructing the School-to-Prison Pipeline
236:). Several others are primary sources (e.g.
560:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
557:
535:
513:
346:Disrupting the School-to-prison Pipeline
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
472:. This article is not so bad that
24:
476:; ordinary editing will work.
1:
611:
574:19:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
552:19:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
530:19:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
507:04:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
490:01:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
453:01:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
436:18:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
419:06:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
400:17:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
326:16:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
309:13:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
280:12:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
258:09:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
218:08:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
65:01:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
79:School-to-prison pipeline
71:School-to-prison pipeline
583:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
297:myriad academic sources
223:Tentatively, I'll say
474:it needs blowing up
318:Squeamish Ossifrage
388:AFD is not cleanup
48:The result was
576:
554:
532:
229:original research
54:non-admin closure
602:
585:
571:
567:
549:
545:
527:
523:
466:juvenile justice
450:
448:
215:
212:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
61:
59:
34:
610:
609:
605:
604:
603:
601:
600:
599:
598:
592:deletion review
581:
569:
565:
547:
543:
525:
521:
446:
444:
426:- per WP:GNG.--
213:
210:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
608:
606:
597:
596:
577:
555:
533:
510:
509:
492:
455:
447:Rhododendrites
438:
421:
403:
402:
386:and note that
384:editing policy
380:
379:
378:
373:
368:
363:
358:
353:
348:
343:
335:
334:
328:
311:
282:
261:
260:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
607:
595:
593:
589:
584:
578:
575:
572:
561:
556:
553:
550:
539:
534:
531:
528:
517:
512:
511:
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
454:
449:
442:
439:
437:
433:
429:
425:
422:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
338:
337:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
281:
277:
273:
270:
266:
263:
262:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
233:
230:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
206:
204:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
62:
60:Esquivalience
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
582:
579:
494:
457:
440:
423:
406:
375:
370:
365:
360:
355:
350:
345:
340:
330:
313:
301:C.J. Griffin
284:
264:
250:Relentlessly
224:
207:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
462:criminology
293:book search
289:news search
164:free images
411:IjonTichy
588:talk page
470:WP:BEFORE
392:Andrew D.
37:talk page
590:or in a
123:View log
39:or in a
482:Bearian
214:Crowned
203:WP:PROD
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
570:MERICA
548:MERICA
526:MERICA
499:Gzuufy
428:BabbaQ
291:and a
272:Borock
269:WP:NPV
265:Delete
225:delete
142:Google
100:delete
424:Keep.
407:Keep.
331:Keep.
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
566:ORTH
544:ORTH
522:ORTH
503:talk
495:Keep
486:talk
464:and
458:Keep
441:Keep
432:talk
415:talk
396:talk
322:talk
314:Keep
305:talk
285:Keep
276:talk
254:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
50:keep
497:.
451:\\
192:TWL
121:– (
52:. (
562:.
540:.
518:.
505:)
488:)
480:.
434:)
417:)
398:)
390:.
324:)
307:)
278:)
256:)
245:,
242:,
239:,
211:DS
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
56:)
568:A
564:N
546:A
542:N
524:A
520:N
501:(
484:(
430:(
413:(
394:(
320:(
303:(
274:(
252:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.