243:. As far as I can tell, this is not an organization in existence. The article refers to three schools that already have their own articles. Whether those three schools are notable is another question. Here, I don't see any notability for an article re-describing these three schools. What is the added value? This article is more a year old. Since it was AfD'd and tagged a year ago, there has been no improvement in establishing notability. The "references" do not actually say anything about these "schools of Chinese tea ceremony."
467:. As long as the three articles on the schools exist, this list article is useful. If the nominator's wish is to delete the articles on the schools, it's those articles that need to be nominated, not this one, because deleting this one won't do anything about those. –
97:
190:
62:
The notability of the articles that now belong to the category was not a matter for discussion in this nomination. Should they subsequently be deleted and the category rendered empty, clearly it can be speedily deleted under
55:. The arguments against this article on notability grounds are compelling, and would apply equally to a list. However the same notability criteria do not as strongly apply to categories, and this suggestion by
92:
184:
517:
does not say which lists are notable. I question the notion that any list of three notable articles will itself be notable. We would then have a LOT of list articles. See also
303:
124:
119:
128:
151:
111:
59:
seems to satisfy the requirements of all parties; no non-notable article or list, but the articles in question are linked together and accessible via a common page.
261:
281:
560:
534:
501:
480:
455:
424:
393:
368:
341:
317:
295:
273:
252:
230:
76:
205:
546:
51:
172:
549:- a category would allow for grouping the schools per Roscelese's comment, while avoiding any notability concerns for the list itself. -
488:
per
Pontificalibus. As long as the listed institutions are notable enough for articles, this article is a valid list article per
166:
476:
17:
162:
350:
115:
525:
has actually made a case for why this list is notable. So no one has actually addressed the basis for the nomination.
212:
332:. Doesn't warrant an independent article, and should be treated in main article or articles on individual schools. --
107:
82:
579:
40:
554:
364:
226:
530:
389:
248:
178:
337:
526:
385:
244:
575:
420:
36:
518:
550:
472:
358:
329:
222:
198:
56:
333:
497:
451:
313:
291:
269:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
574:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
436:
416:
405:
240:
353:
or similar. A notable topic for a list, and a useful one in countering
English Knowledge's
514:
489:
468:
354:
64:
493:
447:
309:
287:
265:
68:
145:
221:
This organization does not seem notable. I can't find any good sources for it.
439:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
408:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
98:
Articles for deletion/Schools of
Chinese Tea Ceremony (2nd nomination)
568:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
141:
137:
133:
197:
380:
A small change in title does not change notability.
93:
Articles for deletion/Schools of
Chinese Tea Ceremony
446:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
415:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
304:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
582:). No further edits should be made to this page.
211:
8:
302:Note: This debate has been included in the
280:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
260:Note: This debate has been included in the
301:
282:list of China-related deletion discussions
279:
259:
90:
547:Category:Chinese Tea Ceremony schools
52:Category:Chinese Tea Ceremony schools
7:
351:List of Chinese Tea Ceremony schools
89:
24:
108:Schools of Chinese Tea Ceremony
83:Schools of Chinese Tea Ceremony
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
599:
481:15:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
456:11:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
425:00:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
394:00:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
369:08:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
342:12:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
318:15:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
296:15:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
274:15:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
253:05:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
231:04:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
561:23:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
535:23:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
502:18:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
77:12:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
571:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
88:AfDs for this article:
544:Convert to category
330:Chinese tea culture
50:Delete, and create
384:is this notable?
361:
458:
427:
359:
320:
307:
298:
285:
276:
590:
573:
557:
445:
441:
414:
410:
308:
286:
216:
215:
201:
149:
131:
48:The result was
34:
598:
597:
593:
592:
591:
589:
588:
587:
586:
580:deletion review
569:
559:
555:
434:
403:
158:
122:
106:
103:
86:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
596:
594:
585:
584:
564:
563:
553:
551:The Bushranger
540:
539:
538:
537:
527:Logical Cowboy
505:
504:
483:
461:
460:
459:
443:
442:
431:
430:
429:
428:
412:
411:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
386:Logical Cowboy
372:
371:
360:Pontificalibus
344:
322:
321:
299:
277:
256:
255:
245:Logical Cowboy
223:Anna Frodesiak
219:
218:
155:
102:
101:
100:
95:
87:
85:
80:
57:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
595:
583:
581:
577:
572:
566:
565:
562:
558:
556:One ping only
552:
548:
545:
542:
541:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:WP:NOTCATALOG
516:
512:
509:
508:
507:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
484:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
463:
462:
457:
453:
449:
444:
440:
438:
433:
432:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
407:
402:
401:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
375:
374:
373:
370:
366:
362:
356:
355:systemic bias
352:
348:
345:
343:
339:
335:
334:Colapeninsula
331:
327:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
305:
300:
297:
293:
289:
283:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
257:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
224:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:Find sources:
156:
153:
147:
143:
139:
135:
130:
126:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
104:
99:
96:
94:
91:
84:
81:
79:
78:
74:
70:
66:
60:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
570:
567:
543:
522:
510:
485:
464:
435:
404:
381:
377:
346:
325:
236:
220:
208:
202:
194:
187:
181:
175:
169:
159:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
513:Thanks but
417:Ron Ritzman
185:free images
576:talk page
469:Roscelese
310:• Gene93k
288:• Gene93k
266:• Gene93k
241:WP:BURDEN
65:WP:CSD#C1
37:talk page
578:or in a
477:contribs
437:Relisted
406:Relisted
152:View log
39:or in a
515:WP:LIST
511:Comment
494:Rlendog
490:WP:LIST
465:Comment
448:BusterD
378:Comment
191:WP refs
179:scholar
125:protect
120:history
69:waggers
523:No one
486:Rename
347:Rename
237:Delete
163:Google
129:delete
328:with
326:Merge
206:JSTOR
167:books
146:views
138:watch
134:links
16:<
531:talk
498:talk
473:talk
452:talk
421:talk
390:talk
365:talk
338:talk
314:talk
292:talk
270:talk
249:talk
239:per
227:talk
199:FENS
173:news
142:logs
116:talk
112:edit
73:talk
521:.
382:Why
349:to
213:TWL
150:– (
533:)
500:)
492:.
479:)
475:⋅
454:)
423:)
392:)
367:)
357:--
340:)
316:)
306:.
294:)
284:.
272:)
264:.
251:)
229:)
193:)
144:|
140:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
75:)
67:.
529:(
496:(
471:(
450:(
419:(
388:(
363:(
336:(
312:(
290:(
268:(
247:(
225:(
217:)
209:·
203:·
195:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
165:(
157:(
154:)
148:)
110:(
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.