Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Scooping - Knowledge

Source 📝

134:- since I've not got the knowledge to expand/cite it and s/he doesn't appear to be doing so I'm AfD'ing to give the 5 days to clean it up or provide material to clean it up. As I say on the talk page, if the author can provide sources I'll happily expand the article myself and request the AfD be withdrawn. Since (on 138:) the author says "I'm a semi-vandal too. Not so much the "obvious" stuff, just little bits here and there.", my hopes aren't that high, and I look forward to a week of reverting vandalism to my talk page... 123: 174: 17: 173:. By the nature of the word, a Google search is tough, but searching "scooping nipples "bean dip"" finds nothing relevant. 96: 91: 100: 204: 83: 36: 191:- nonsense entry. Article was nominated for speedy by Iridescenti but article's creator removed the speedy tag. 203:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
135: 140: 180: 179:. Awaiting sourcing with unbated breath and hoping Iridescenti (and I) won't need too big a shovel.-- 183: 153: 131: 87: 65: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
177: 49: 170: 166: 163: 60: 54: 169:
or possibly a hoax, that even if it were a common phrase, would probably fall under
117: 130:
I speedied this earlier today but the author's made a potentially valid point on
79: 71: 197:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113: 109: 105: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 207:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 176:. Not even an entry at urbandictionary 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 171:Knowledge is not a dictionary 224: 184:23:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 154:22:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 66:09:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 200:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 136:User_talk:Sarahpw4444 64: 50:complete bollocks 215: 202: 152: 150: 145: 121: 103: 58: 34: 223: 222: 218: 217: 216: 214: 213: 212: 211: 205:deletion review 198: 181:Fuhghettaboutit 146: 141: 139: 94: 78: 75: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 221: 219: 210: 209: 193: 192: 186: 128: 127: 74: 69: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 220: 208: 206: 201: 195: 194: 190: 189:Speedy delete 187: 185: 182: 178: 175: 172: 168: 165: 161: 158: 157: 156: 155: 151: 149: 144: 137: 133: 132:Talk:Scooping 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76: 73: 70: 68: 67: 62: 57: 56: 51: 47: 46:Speedy delete 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 199: 196: 188: 164:unattributed 159: 147: 142: 129: 53: 45: 43: 31: 28: 167:neologism 124:View log 80:Scooping 72:Scooping 97:protect 92:history 162:as an 160:Delete 143:Irides 101:delete 148:centi 118:views 110:watch 106:links 61:Help! 16:< 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 122:– ( 55:Guy 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 52:. 48:, 126:) 120:) 82:( 63:) 59:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
complete bollocks
Guy
Help!
09:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Scooping
Scooping
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Talk:Scooping
User_talk:Sarahpw4444
Iridescenti
22:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
unattributed
neologism
Knowledge is not a dictionary


Fuhghettaboutit
23:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.