222:
popular lexicon, in the 6 months since this incident it has clearly demonstrated both the foothold(some bicoastal types were involved) and irreverence necessary to have some staying power. As for its place on
Knowledge (XXG), terms like "who's your daddy" are an important part of the site's forward thinking, popular flavor. My admittedly biased vote, is to keep it on.
221:
I have heard this term used independently of its originators twice in the last two weeks. It was especially gratifying for me as I was in attendance on the evening of its genesis. Ironically, it took place at Gin Lane in Lower
Manhattanand the depiction of events is spot on. As for its place in the
262:
208:
This term has an appropriate place in the lexicon relating to the preparation of cocktails. There does appear a necessity to describe preparation which is essentially a hybrid between "neat" and "on the
112:
17:
237:
85:
80:
89:
72:
182:
301:
36:
300:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
233:
225:
286:
269:
252:
213:
200:
186:
161:
149:
128:
54:
173:
76:
210:
138:
229:
68:
60:
248:, since you were present at its "genesis" 6 months ago? To what "foothold" are you referring? --
124:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
266:
249:
198:
178:
143:
279:
49:
119:
There are no links to this page and content does not seem meaningful or encyclopaedic
158:
120:
106:
195:
170:
283:
245:
263:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not for things made up in school one day
294:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
102:
98:
94:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
244:You admit, then, that this is a
1:
274:With no verifiable sources,
321:
287:20:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
270:21:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
253:21:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
214:19:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
201:19:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
187:15:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
162:23:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
150:22:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
129:22:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
55:03:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
137:- made up in a day junk (
297:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
228:comment was added by
169:No sources, balls.
241:
185:
312:
299:
223:
181:
176:
148:
146:
110:
92:
52:
34:
320:
319:
315:
314:
313:
311:
310:
309:
308:
302:deletion review
295:
224:—The preceding
194:per all above.
174:
144:
142:
83:
67:
64:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
318:
316:
307:
306:
290:
289:
272:
257:
256:
255:
216:
203:
189:
164:
152:
117:
116:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
317:
305:
303:
298:
292:
291:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
271:
268:
264:
261:
258:
254:
251:
247:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
220:
217:
215:
212:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
193:
190:
188:
184:
180:
177:
172:
168:
165:
163:
160:
157:Hoax. Balls.
156:
153:
151:
147:
140:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
126:
125:talk to me...
122:
114:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:Scotch, balls
66:
65:
62:
61:Scotch, balls
59:
57:
56:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
296:
293:
275:
259:
218:
211:66.108.0.129
205:
191:
166:
154:
134:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
267:Scientizzle
250:Scientizzle
230:Andrewmeany
145:RevRagnarok
246:neologism
139:Bollocks!
51:Wizardman
238:contribs
226:unsigned
183:contribs
113:View log
209:rocks".
167:Delete.
159:Croxley
121:GDon4t0
86:protect
81:history
280:WP:NEO
276:delete
260:Delete
196:RJASE1
192:Delete
155:Delete
135:Delete
90:delete
46:delete
265:. --
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
284:Deor
282:. -
278:per
234:talk
219:Keep
206:Keep
141:) —
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
179:g92
111:– (
48:.--
240:).
236:•
171:Ab
127:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
232:(
175:e
123:(
115:)
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.