Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Scott Chisholm (journalist) - Knowledge

Source 📝

336:- if the article could be appropriately sourced, he'd be notable as a prolific and award-winning journalist. The sources for the relevant claims aren't there yet, though, (even after Gr1st's work above) so at this stage delete. - 154: 375:
provides guidelines for a presumption of notability. The presumption is rebuttable. In assessing whether the presumption is rebutted it's appropriate to look at secondary policies, including (in this case)
148: 256: 115: 189:(which includes journalists), hasn't been widely cited by peers or successors, no new concepts/techniques/major roles/critical attention or significant contributions. 282: 88: 83: 92: 75: 169: 136: 130: 17: 407: 389: 367: 345: 325: 297: 271: 246: 212: 195: 126: 57: 176: 222: 79: 422: 71: 63: 36: 421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
385: 341: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
142: 404: 321: 293: 267: 230: 381: 337: 162: 377: 208: 186: 226: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
317: 308: 289: 263: 190: 363: 242: 53: 372: 355: 204: 354:
He doesn't have to be prolific or award-winning. He just has to be the subject of
109: 234: 359: 238: 49: 356:
significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
311:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
358:. I don't see where the above three references fall down on that. 415:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105: 101: 97: 161: 316:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 425:). No further edits should be made to this page. 257:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions 283:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 175: 8: 277: 251: 221:Added some sources, significant coverage 185:Doesn't satisfy the criteria detailed at 281:: This debate has been included in the 255:: This debate has been included in the 403:Fails notability, though not by much. 233:in particular. That's good enough for 203:: nil sources, fails basic criteria. 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 298:23:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 272:23:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 247:22:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 213:08:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 196:08:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 408:03:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 390:00:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 368:11:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 346:01:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 326:00:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 72:Scott Chisholm (journalist) 64:Scott Chisholm (journalist) 58:03:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 442: 237:as far as I'm concerned. 418:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 328: 300: 286: 274: 260: 433: 420: 315: 313: 287: 261: 180: 179: 165: 113: 95: 34: 441: 440: 436: 435: 434: 432: 431: 430: 429: 423:deletion review 416: 306: 122: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 439: 437: 428: 427: 411: 410: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 382:DustFormsWords 349: 348: 338:DustFormsWords 330: 329: 314: 303: 302: 301: 275: 249: 183: 182: 119: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 438: 426: 424: 419: 413: 412: 409: 406: 402: 399: 398: 391: 387: 383: 379: 374: 371: 370: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 352: 351: 350: 347: 343: 339: 335: 332: 331: 327: 323: 319: 312: 310: 305: 304: 299: 295: 291: 284: 280: 276: 273: 269: 265: 258: 254: 250: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 217: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 197: 194: 193: 188: 178: 174: 171: 168: 164: 160: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 125: 124:Find sources: 120: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 417: 414: 405:Orderinchaos 400: 333: 307: 278: 252: 218: 200: 199: 191: 184: 172: 166: 158: 151: 145: 139: 133: 123: 45: 43: 31: 28: 378:WP:CREATIVE 334:Weak delete 318:Ron Ritzman 290:Ron Ritzman 264:Ron Ritzman 187:WP:CREATIVE 149:free images 309:Relisted 205:Fifelfoo 116:View log 155:WP refs 143:scholar 89:protect 84:history 401:Delete 373:WP:GNG 201:Delete 127:Google 93:delete 46:delete 360:Gr1st 239:Gr1st 219:Keep. 192:ƒ(Δ)² 170:JSTOR 131:books 110:views 102:watch 98:links 50:Kevin 16:< 386:talk 380:. - 364:talk 342:talk 322:talk 294:talk 279:Note 268:talk 253:Note 243:talk 235:WP:N 231:here 229:and 227:here 223:here 209:talk 163:FENS 137:news 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 288:-- 262:-- 177:TWL 114:– ( 388:) 366:) 344:) 324:) 296:) 285:. 270:) 259:. 245:) 225:, 211:) 157:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 384:( 362:( 340:( 320:( 292:( 266:( 241:( 207:( 181:) 173:· 167:· 159:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 134:· 129:( 121:( 118:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Kevin
talk
03:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Scott Chisholm (journalist)
Scott Chisholm (journalist)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:CREATIVE
ƒ(Δ)²
08:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Fifelfoo

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.