368:
The promotional tone is pretty irrelevant if he isn't notable, which is what this discussion is about. As the note I left on your talk page notes, if you are being paid to edit the article then you must disclose this, including who your employer is.
318:'s nomination is excellent and I can't see any fault in it. The only reason I have for hesitating to agree with a call for deletion is a feeling that somebody might wonder just who are these somewhat shadowy names that pop up as trustees of
187:
354:,I edited this entry in the past, and saw it's considered for deletion now for being written in a promotional style etc. So I made some edits to try to improve it. Can you let me know what you think please?
259:
140:
424:
277:
181:
332:
seems unlikely. I'm not certain that
Knowledge (XXG) should be doing this job, but I'd be reassured if I knew that some website somewhere was doing it. --
147:
17:
113:
108:
117:
446:
391:
202:
298:
480:
219:
169:
40:
319:
100:
292:
163:
74:
266:
476:
457:
218:
I can't find any substantial coverage of the subject in RS. The article states he is a photographer but
36:
234:
230:
159:
461:
436:
415:
378:
363:
341:
303:
269:
251:
82:
195:
209:
413:
401:
324:
65:
53:
226:
was the best I could find. (Note that a different Scott Mead is more notable as a photographer
432:
374:
359:
263:
247:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
475:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
286:
239:
337:
104:
236:
175:
227:
330:
Son of Who Runs This Place? The
Anatomy of Britain a Bit Further into the 21st Century
406:
428:
370:
355:
347:
315:
243:
229:). Similarly I can only find brief mentions of his career at Goldman Sachs e.g. in
134:
281:
351:
333:
96:
88:
469:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
449:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
394:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
238:. Unless there are sources that I haven't been able to find
130:
126:
122:
194:
400:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
455:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
208:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
483:). No further edits should be made to this page.
260:list of Photography-related deletion discussions
8:
425:list of England-related deletion discussions
423:Note: This debate has been included in the
276:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:Note: This debate has been included in the
322:, etc. Because the author of the excellent
278:list of People-related deletion discussions
233:or in relation to his PA stealing from him
422:
275:
257:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
83:16:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
328:is now dead, publication of
462:01:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
437:19:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
416:12:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
379:14:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
364:14:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
342:23:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
304:03:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
270:21:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
252:20:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
500:
320:The Photographers' Gallery
472:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
222:in the low-quality
325:Anatomy of Britain
464:
439:
418:
306:
302:
272:
81:
63:
60:non-admin closure
491:
474:
460:
454:
452:
450:
411:
404:
399:
397:
395:
284:
224:Evening Standard
213:
212:
198:
150:
138:
120:
79:
77:
71:
57:
34:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
490:
489:
488:
487:
481:deletion review
470:
465:
456:
445:
443:
419:
407:
402:
390:
388:
155:
146:
111:
95:
92:
75:
70:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
497:
495:
486:
485:
453:
442:
441:
440:
398:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
308:
307:
273:
216:
215:
152:
91:
86:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
496:
484:
482:
478:
473:
467:
466:
463:
459:
458:North America
451:
448:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
420:
417:
414:
412:
410:
405:
396:
393:
380:
376:
372:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
321:
317:
313:
310:
309:
305:
300:
297:
294:
291:
288:
283:
279:
274:
271:
268:
265:
261:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
235:
232:
228:
225:
221:
220:this coverage
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
149:
145:
142:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
115:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
90:
87:
85:
84:
78:
73:
72:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
471:
468:
444:
408:
389:
346:Comment: Hi
329:
323:
311:
295:
289:
264:Everymorning
223:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
143:
64:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
242:isn't met.
182:free images
97:Scott Mead
89:Scott Mead
67:Rcsprinter
477:talk page
429:• Gene93k
37:talk page
479:or in a
447:Relisted
409:JAaron95
392:Relisted
141:View log
76:(confer)
39:or in a
371:SmartSE
356:BenSalo
348:SmartSE
316:SmartSE
312:Comment
244:SmartSE
188:WP refs
176:scholar
114:protect
109:history
282:JJMC89
267:(talk)
240:WP:BIO
231:The FT
160:Google
118:delete
352:Hoary
334:Hoary
203:JSTOR
164:books
148:Stats
135:views
127:watch
123:links
54:NPASR
16:<
433:talk
375:talk
360:talk
350:and
338:talk
280:. —
248:talk
196:FENS
170:news
131:logs
105:talk
101:edit
210:TWL
139:– (
69:123
52:. (
435:)
427:.
377:)
362:)
340:)
314::
262:.
250:)
190:)
133:|
129:|
125:|
121:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
56:)
431:(
403:☮
373:(
358:(
336:(
301:)
299:C
296:·
293:E
290:·
287:T
285:(
246:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
144:·
137:)
99:(
80:@
62:)
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.