349:""Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail". The sources provided all seem to verify who he is, a spokesperson for the White Sox organization, but do not discuss him in the sort of detail that would lend to notability. I don't feel that they aggregate to meet GNG. The above editor's comparisons to Harry Caray and Charles Manson are beyond absurd. –
560:
425:
The article as it stands has no sources to establish notability and the sources listed here, including the
Chicago Tribune pieces listed by TonyTheTiger are minor pieces that mostly quote him in his role as PR guy with the White Sox... his role was to issue press releases. None of these articles
550:
554:
572:
I think there's enough here for GNG per his frequent designation as a spokesperson and that there is reasonable amount of coverage of him as an early adopter an specialist in social media communications for the White Sox.
168:
600:
These AfDs are getting dumber and dumber. First, bullpen catchers were deemed to be notable, and now some people believe being a team spokesman is notable. Where's the substantial coverage of
326:
162:
121:
306:
286:
264:
they are. Many of these articles are passing mentions, but more than enough to aggregate into significant coverage and more than enough to satisfy
549:
evidences that
Reifert maintained the official blog for the White Sox, and his reputation as a social media specialist is supported by details in
128:
406:
I don't think that's a sufficient test of notability. It means he's been mentioned a bunch, sure, but none of them are in sufficient depth. –
426:
cover him in any significant detail and his role with the team was not significant enough to satisfy baseball notability guidelines or GNG.
447:
per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Nominator is also voting inside nominations -- removed.
384:
546:
240:
is not notable as all he did was announce baseball games. People do not have to hold more than one position to be notable, they need
461:
Hmm. That's what tacos get for being unrepentant, I guess. I haven't seen his/her other AfDs, but this one I still think is just. –
200:
per failing WP:GNG, I'll concede he is VP of the White Sox, one of several, but not notability beyond that or independent coverage.
94:
89:
388:
98:
17:
543:, though not the best quality source, provides some coverage regarding how Reifert and the media were not quite getting along.
81:
183:
150:
261:
257:
609:
273:
632:
217:
205:
40:
144:
540:
519:, yes he was interviewed for White Sox related manners and some passing mentions but I don't see the multiple
253:
494:
613:
590:
527:
503:
470:
456:
435:
415:
401:
380:
358:
338:
318:
298:
277:
221:
140:
63:
628:
605:
581:
269:
36:
523:
that covers the subject in detail required here. Nominator blocked as sock has no effect on this AFD.
431:
213:
201:
190:
564:
176:
466:
411:
354:
85:
57:
392:
375:
334:
314:
294:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
627:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
537:
I've been able to access full-text of various newspaper sources. Here's what has turned up:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
574:
482:
241:
371:
249:
156:
452:
427:
396:
233:
585:
516:
462:
407:
367:
350:
265:
77:
69:
54:
520:
330:
310:
290:
245:
115:
524:
237:
448:
485:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
604:
required by Wiki notability guidelines? There doesn't appear to be any. -
236:
really isn't notable outside of being a murderer. It is like saying
621:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
248:. There are five pages of articles in the Chicago Tribune
443:: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for
366:
I generally will support any
Chicago personality based on
444:
111:
107:
103:
175:
492:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
327:
256:on ESPN.com. Want books? He is mentioned in a few
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
635:). No further edits should be made to this page.
561:Reifert is quoted several times in this article
307:list of Baseball-related deletion discussions
287:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions
189:
8:
325:Note: This debate has been included in the
305:Note: This debate has been included in the
285:Note: This debate has been included in the
521:reliable sources independent of the subject
324:
304:
284:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
563:regarding how press seats at
515:I don't see him how he meets
208:) 18:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
652:
547:Chicago Sun-Times article
528:01:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
504:10:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
471:15:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
457:16:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
436:20:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
416:20:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
402:13:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
359:01:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
339:01:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
319:01:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
299:01:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
278:19:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
222:13:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
624:Please do not modify it.
614:20:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
591:05:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
260:. USA Today? Of course,
64:16:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
372:Chicago Tribune archive
565:U.S. Cellular Field
541:This newsblog entry
48:The result was
589:
506:
400:
341:
321:
301:
252:as well as a few
225:
643:
626:
606:Bbny-wiki-editor
583:
579:
500:
497:
491:
487:
378:
270:FoolMeOnce2Times
210:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
60:
34:
651:
650:
646:
645:
644:
642:
641:
640:
639:
633:deletion review
622:
575:
567:might be moved.
498:
495:
480:
214:Unscintillating
202:UnrepentantTaco
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
649:
647:
638:
637:
617:
616:
594:
593:
570:
569:
568:
558:
544:
531:
530:
509:
508:
507:
489:
488:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
438:
420:
419:
418:
361:
343:
342:
322:
302:
281:
280:
234:Charles Manson
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
648:
636:
634:
630:
625:
619:
618:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
596:
595:
592:
587:
584:(note: not a
582:
580:
578:
571:
566:
562:
559:
556:
552:
548:
545:
542:
539:
538:
536:
533:
532:
529:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
510:
505:
502:
501:
499:Postlethwaite
490:
486:
484:
479:
478:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:sock puppetry
442:
439:
437:
433:
429:
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
323:
320:
316:
312:
308:
303:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
227:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
209:
207:
203:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:Scott Reifert
75:
74:
71:
70:Scott Reifert
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
623:
620:
601:
597:
577:I, Jethrobot
576:
555:this one too
534:
512:
493:
481:
440:
422:
376:TonyTheTiger
363:
346:
229:
199:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
53:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
238:Harry Caray
163:free images
428:Spanneraol
393:WP:CHICAGO
370:who has a
629:talk page
551:this book
331:• Gene93k
311:• Gene93k
291:• Gene93k
242:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
631:or in a
483:Relisted
463:Muboshgu
408:Muboshgu
351:Muboshgu
122:View log
39:or in a
602:Reifert
553:and in
441:Comment
397:WP:FOUR
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
59:Faraone
598:Delete
525:Secret
517:WP:BIO
513:Delete
423:Delete
368:WP:GNG
347:Delete
266:WP:GNG
141:Google
99:delete
449:Crtew
246:WP:RS
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
610:talk
535:Keep
496:Ryan
467:talk
453:talk
432:talk
412:talk
364:Keep
355:talk
335:talk
315:talk
295:talk
274:talk
268:. --
262:here
258:here
254:here
250:here
230:Keep
218:talk
206:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
586:bot
389:BIO
374:.--
244:in
212:.
191:TWL
120:– (
612:)
588:!)
469:)
455:)
434:)
414:)
399:)
357:)
337:)
329:.
317:)
309:.
297:)
289:.
276:)
232:-
220:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
608:(
557:.
465:(
451:(
430:(
410:(
395:/
391:/
387:/
385:C
383:/
381:T
379:(
353:(
333:(
313:(
293:(
272:(
224:]
216:(
204:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
55:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.