317:
encyclopaedic information a source supports, whether a subject is better addressed in some other way than an article of its own (because that's what the sources themselves do), and whether independent sources even exist at all. The measure is not of whether something is a "niche" subject. Plenty of "niche" subjects, from (some) individual asteroids to (some) individual railway stations, are covered in depth in multiple independent published works within their respective disciplines. Notability doesn't equate to fame, significance, or importance. It's governed by the depths and provenances of the sources available for the specific subject at hand. It's the extent to which a subject has been not
247:
acceptable as an assertion of notability. We're not trying to make your life difficult here :) This might be an important topic for you, but that doesn't mean it's encyclopedic or otherwise worthy of inclusion. No one here is against the recreation of the page once the company is notable. Knowledge
238:
for deletion under those specific guidelines, which are very strict (for good reasons). And don't give too much importance to the "Russian patent" part - they could be US patents or
Canadian patents or Palau patents. It doesn't matter where they were awarded, the point is that the company isn't
316:
Yes. We find as many independent reliable sources as we can find, and we evaluate them to see whether their coverage of the subject is a trivial passing mention in discussion of something else, or an in-depth discussion of the subject at hand. It's a matter of seeing how much (potential)
301:
agreed now. it seems not notable enough. agree to delete. do we have a quantifiable procedure for notability like so many third party resources etc. clearly niche organizations need to be bigger and then have a wiki page. agree to delete. sorry for the bother. this was my first page. sigh
195:. But What does "Russian " patent mean ?? Cost of filing patents is more expensive in EU.I find the Qyartermaster's talk to be cursory and dismissive while the Original Proder seems a bit biased on the Russianess of the patent even though he admits it is just slightly beyond
264:
ok.I dont get it still but its okay.I still think it is an important company in russian-finland software or in audio testing software but notability would need to be established by a resident of those countries I suppose.
190:
Not spam at all just that the software was claimed to be really radically new in the audio quality field as it basically works in automating audio quality.Even original PRODer says it was just slightly beyond
199:. Also it is wrong that there is one product - I have mentioned three products including Document management System, Association rules for market basket analysis and the audio quality product. --
124:
286:
What was said is that since the company's importance, or notoriety, has not been established outside
Knowledge (XXG), Knowledge (XXG) won't have an article about it. --
17:
363:
36:
326:
91:
86:
95:
362:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
181:
78:
282:
No, it's obvious from this comment that you do not understand the very concept we are talking about. See
307:
270:
218:
204:
244:
255:
177:
164:
338:
311:
296:
274:
259:
222:
208:
185:
168:
144:
60:
239:
notable to begin with, and your recent edits seem to indicate you're shifting to "this company
334:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
158:
231:
196:
192:
154:
303:
266:
214:
200:
51:
283:
213:
I have also added more references now and edited to include the existing products. --
161:. No problem with the company's page being recreated once notability is established.
330:
112:
82:
234:
doesn't mean I didn't think it should be deleted, just that it wasn't
74:
66:
131:
Contested prod. Finnish company with no assertion of notability.
356:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
243:
be important because of their patents", which is also normally
153:- As the original PRODer. The article was just slightly beyond
230:- My point about the article being just slightly north of
157:. Two Russian patents and one product simply do not meet
119:
108:
104:
100:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
366:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
176:- More software company spam. --
321:, demonstrating that it is not
252:importance, not establish it.
1:
339:15:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
312:08:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
297:23:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
284:what we mean by "notability."
275:07:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
260:20:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
223:19:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
209:19:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
186:18:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
169:18:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
145:18:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
61:07:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
383:
327:User:Uncle G/On notability
359:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
248:(XXG) is intended to
44:The result was
294:
142:
59:
374:
361:
293:
291:
258:
167:
141:
139:
122:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
382:
381:
377:
376:
375:
373:
372:
371:
370:
364:deletion review
357:
287:
253:
162:
135:
118:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
380:
378:
369:
368:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
211:
188:
171:
129:
128:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
379:
367:
365:
360:
354:
353:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
300:
299:
298:
290:
285:
281:
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
257:
256:FreeRangeFrog
251:
246:
242:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
189:
187:
183:
179:
178:Quartermaster
175:
172:
170:
166:
165:FreeRangeFrog
160:
156:
152:
149:
148:
147:
146:
138:
134:
126:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
358:
355:
322:
318:
288:
279:
249:
240:
235:
227:
173:
150:
136:
132:
130:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
304:Audiovocal
289:Blanchardb
267:Audiovocal
215:Audiovocal
201:Audiovocal
137:Blanchardb
54:Sandstein
325:. Read
295:- timed
280:Comment.
250:document
236:eligible
143:- timed
125:View log
331:Uncle G
228:Comment
159:WP:CORP
133:Delete.
92:protect
87:history
232:WP:CSD
197:WP:CSD
193:WP:CSD
174:Delete
155:WP:CSD
151:Delete
120:delete
96:delete
75:Sevana
67:Sevana
46:delete
241:might
123:) – (
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
335:talk
323:able
308:talk
271:talk
219:talk
205:talk
182:talk
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
245:not
337:)
329:.
319:ed
310:)
302:--
273:)
265:--
221:)
207:)
184:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
48:.
333:(
306:(
292:-
269:(
254:§
217:(
203:(
180:(
163:§
140:-
127:)
117:(
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.