1158:- "Sex jihad" or "Jihad-Al-Nikah" are completely NEW terms being used by some people and media recently for Syria war. This practice was never there in Islam during the time of Prophet Mohammad(pbuh) nor after that. There is no authenticity of it in Islam. So, it is clear that connecting "sex jihad" to other established terms of Islam like "muslim women", "jihad", "establishment of Islamic rule" etc is nothing but a negative propaganda to insult people of a particular religion. An article at wikipedia can not be ill motivated and should be neutral.
849:: At this point, with reliable sources stating that the government of Tunisia is responding to this phenomenon, "sexual jihad" would remain notable even if eventually proved to be some kind of hoax; it would be a notable hoax. Jihad al-nikah appears to meet the requirements for notability due to coverage in reliable sources; I came to this article due to looking up the phenomenon after reading a Reuters news piece about it. --
202:
1517:
931:
It has been reported, but I don't think the spectrum is necessarily broad. Two of those sources - Shabestan news agency and
Shiitenews - are polemical Sunni/Shi'a hate sites that most just "report" propaganda to make one denomination or the other look bad. Removing those would cut the sources down to
692:
is a bad argument to make about notability as we care about the quality of the sources (I'd agree they aren't great). I also don't think this is exactly a neologism as this article isn't about the specific phrase (i.e it could be changed to Jihad Al-Nikah easily enough with no impact on the article).
1347:
Are you stoned? This "sex jihad" thing has been mentioned in the news for a very short period of time. Mary Toft has received coverage 250-300 years after her death. You claiming that her incident was a "passing fad" in order to defend this "sex jihad" thing is ludicrous in the extreme.
1425:: This is not a policy-based reason to keep, 24.90.57.129. If anything, your comment brings to light the realities of Sunni-Shia friction which much of the Western world doesn't really understand. So, its not surprising that an evidence-free concept like
1056:
932:
six. Do six sources, all of which popped up very recently, prove this is a legit term which will be used in the future rather than just a neologism that popped up for a brief period of time in six sources? That seems to be the question here.
378:
Of the five sources on the article, all of them are only months old. Not only is it a neologism but it seems to be one of very limited use. A buzz word used in literally just a handful of
Internet headlines does not an article make.
999:
I have been swayed by the arguments that this is really a news story or neologism that may not last beyond the next news cycle, and is merely a recent phrase, thus it should not be included without better evidence of notability.
1545:, a recently coined neologism. If the term catches on and use persists then the article should be recreated, but there's not much right now that would indicate this is a term used beyond a small number of news publishers.
1188:
There is evidence against this ever happening especially on a wide scale basis. The
Islamic clergy cited and those close to him denied the claims stated here tying them to the act. An Encyclopedia must include facts, not
1236:
An encyclopedia must contain notable hoaxes, however. So even if this practice is a myth (and I agree I've seen no hard proof it exists in reliable
Western media), there has been so much coverage about it, its a clear
604:
497:: Hoax or not, the concept seems to be notable. Maybe its better covered under some Syrian war propaganda discussion, but a stand alone article seems defensible, as readers are going to try to look this up. Like the
898:
is a neologism or just the title of the article. If it is the subject and the subject is well-sourced we can change the title. It's also not clear to me that this shouldn't be merged but I can't figure out where.
1054:
166:
1493:
The issue is not strange. If young men are going there to die in the name of religion, it is not unlikely that women will go there to serve them sexually under the false belief that this is a form of jihad.
454:
353:
Don't mix up things. It is not just about having sex. It is about muslim woman prostituting themselves, in some cases even involuntarily, in the name of religion and as part of Jihad.
119:
209:
1303:
Bullshit. This "sex jihad" thing has been in the news for a very short time. Mary Toft's case has been cited and commented on nearly 300 years later. That's a stupid comparison.
1475:
is obviously part of the Jihad, which is an encyclopedic topic, and is executed in the name of Jihad. The term "sexual Jihad" is even used by muslim sources like the
Iranian
787:
160:
474:
822:
718:
as that is its correct technical term. Is the push for deletion an attempt to censor information and prevent learning, the very purpose of an encyclopedia?
782:
No, not quite. The bulk of the article is about the Syrian War and the recruitment of women for those fights. The article you cite (and which you put into
522:. It is the English translation of an Arabic term. Also, it seems to be an important concept of Jihad in the Syrian war, having effects as far as Tunisia.
874:
413:
per nom. And the sources are lousy. The only half-way decent one is the IBT and that too is iffy because IBT is primarily a business news site. --
631:, good deal of secondary source coverage of this notable topic here, enough for significant expansion and improvement potential in the future. —
126:
1221:
1205:
697:. It satisfies the coverage criterion, but apparently not the depth criterion, but I wouldn't venture whether it should be kept or deleted.
396:
Several sources report the phenomena and it is a new phrase for what is new to
Western readers. Let the article grow as the sources expand.
1496:
218:
946:
There are a lot more to choose from than six, see google news. As has already been outlined, this isn't about the term, so it can't fail
1225:
744:
248:
1401:
17:
740:
758:
1533:
670:
1577:
of women giving themselves sexually to jihadis is notable. The correct title for the article could be discussed separately. --
1389:
1174:
693:
The real question is whether the issuing of the fatwa was a notable event and the criteria people should be looking at is the
1251:
An encyclopedia doesn't have to include anything of the sort. There's no evidence this is anything other than a passing fad.
817:
per norms. The article's tone doesnot maintain a neutral point of view. The article creator has a history of creating such
234:
1429:
would get broad coverage in
Western media, clueless to the fact that there is every reason to be skeptical of both sides.--
651:
92:
87:
181:
96:
1668:
40:
148:
335:. Neologism. All insurgents/soldiers/rebels likely have sex from time to time; no need to tell that in encyclopedia.
1217:
1201:
79:
207:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
615:
600:
322:
280:
1138:
920:
825:
797:
790:
401:
1130:
1640:
per
Lankiveil. There's no indication that this sexy buzzword will have any sort of lasting significance. --
1397:
1213:
1197:
1193:
1162:
689:
658:
264:
238:
142:
1405:
527:
223:
1664:
1360:
1315:
1263:
1116:
1084:
1039:
904:
736:
723:
419:
36:
138:
1529:
1504:
1455:
937:
666:
611:
384:
362:
318:
1649:
1632:
1624:
1615:
1586:
1568:
1549:
1508:
1459:
1438:
1409:
1365:
1338:
1320:
1294:
1268:
1246:
1178:
1166:
1142:
1120:
1106:
1088:
1067:
1044:
1013:
991:
963:
941:
924:
885:
858:
841:
801:
773:
727:
706:
674:
642:
619:
590:
555:
531:
510:
486:
466:
445:
424:
405:
388:
366:
344:
326:
61:
1628:
1611:
1349:
1304:
1252:
1170:
1134:
1102:
1063:
1028:
959:
916:
793:
702:
397:
174:
1573:
However, the term is not the subject of the discussion; we are meant to be discussing whether the
1024:
951:
818:
1582:
854:
270:
201:
188:
57:
694:
1027:
violation. Utterly unencyclopedic, and a recent thing, showing no evidence of sustained usage.
1480:
1009:
987:
881:
837:
769:
551:
523:
482:
462:
441:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1476:
1112:
1080:
912:
732:
719:
414:
1126:
947:
870:
761:
608:
543:
519:
433:
314:
1525:
1500:
1451:
933:
662:
582:
380:
358:
824:
shows most of the pages created by the editor are on massacares of Hindus in villages of
873:. The term is not widely known in Muslim world plus there are reliable sources like this
1607:
1546:
1098:
1079:- This article contains false information, It's meet the criteria for deletion rapid --
1059:
955:
829:
698:
638:
154:
83:
1645:
1623:
I got 2,300,000 results in Google Search. It is not anyway a term with little usage.
1603:
1578:
1561:
1431:
1331:
1287:
1239:
850:
503:
340:
53:
911:
because it isn't part of Islam. It's clearly a fringe phenomena that is part of the
1599:
1005:
983:
877:
833:
765:
570:
547:
498:
478:
458:
437:
298:
286:
254:
113:
915:. But it is being widely reported across a broad spectrum of news organizations.
233:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
1602:. The term is only within the scope of recent Syrian war plus not-notable like
876:
that describes the claims from the
Tunisian interior minister as unconfirmed.--
684:
I think it's a hard call whether this is truly notable or some of the standard
575:
1484:
1282:
869:
The coverages can meet for the
Wikinews but not an encyclopedic article per
783:
685:
633:
75:
67:
1559:
Yeah, except for the massive number of news publishers that have used it.--
1641:
1053:
The article is about the concept (which is still appearing in the media:
900:
828:
while the cited sources actually reveals that genocides happened against
336:
1394:
Don't be naive. Sex jihad was acknowledged by the Tunisian government.
908:
1657:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
654:
in one of the most reputable danish national newspapers today.
196:
982:- even if, or especially as, it is a well-documentable hoax.
1450:- Inherently subjective article. Not an encyclopedic topic.
227:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
786:) is a conspiracy theory in Egypt of which there are many
455:
list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
217:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
714:, it is noteworthy. I however believe it is best titled
1423:
109:
105:
101:
1111:
There is nothing called Sex Jihad or Jihad-Al-Nikah --
436:. The IBT source is also calling the campaign a hoax.
173:
832:
irrespective of whether they are Hindus or Muslims.--
1469:
The Times, The Huffington Post, The Daily Telegraph
1133:. It's a topic that's been discussed in the media.
187:
907:? None seem to fit the bill. It doesn't belong in
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1671:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1281:include notable hoaxes. You might as well call
1467:The article is based on reliable sources like
501:people do look to see this is a real thing.--
247:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
473:Note: This debate has been included in the
453:Note: This debate has been included in the
757:How it is noteworthy? Even the cited source
475:list of Islam-related deletion discussions
472:
452:
221:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
569:: Seems notable. It should be Renamed to
826:Bangladesh during 1971 war with Pakistan
241:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
1329:But she really give birth to rabbits?--
1125:Sources say otherwise contrary to your
1481:Al-Qaeda’s Indecent Proposal to Widows
317:very few hits on google for this term
1421:Reply to comment people keep deleting
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
542:The arabic term itself falls under
1536:) has already cast a !vote above.
1497:Sexual jihad: propaganda or truth?
24:
1515:
688:stories from online newspapers.
200:
603:As for your rename suggestion,
1650:17:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
1633:07:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
1616:07:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
1587:14:23, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
1569:03:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
1550:01:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
1509:11:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
1460:18:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
1439:19:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1410:18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1366:08:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
1339:03:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
1321:21:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1295:20:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1269:19:48, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1247:16:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1179:02:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1143:10:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1121:08:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1107:22:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
1089:18:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
1068:22:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
1045:14:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
1014:20:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
992:13:52, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
964:22:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
942:03:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
925:21:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
886:12:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
859:12:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
842:12:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
802:21:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
774:12:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
760:tells it a hoax! Please, read
728:07:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
707:21:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
675:20:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
643:19:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
620:17:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
591:18:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
556:13:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
532:15:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
511:04:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
487:14:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
467:14:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
446:13:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
425:13:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
406:12:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
389:09:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
367:11:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
345:09:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
327:05:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
237:on the part of others and to
1097:What do you think is false?
1208:) 15:35, September 25, 2013
62:07:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
1688:
1129:and clear indication that
894:It's not clear to me that
1660:Please do not modify it.
1483:. Also the muslim major
32:Please do not modify it.
1487:news agency talks of a
1390:Personal attack removed
279:; accounts blocked for
249:single-purpose accounts
219:policies and guidelines
1479:.. see this article
1226:few or no other edits
1058:) not the neologism.
905:Prostitution in Syria
745:few or no other edits
1362:(tell Luke off here)
1317:(tell Luke off here)
1277:No, an encyclopedia
1265:(tell Luke off here)
1228:outside this topic.
1041:(tell Luke off here)
747:outside this topic.
607:This is certainly a
231:by counting votes.
210:not a majority vote
48:The result was
1567:
1537:
1437:
1400:comment added by
1393:
1337:
1293:
1245:
1229:
1210:
1196:comment added by
1182:
1165:comment added by
1131:you don't like it
748:
678:
661:comment added by
509:
489:
469:
423:
312:
311:
308:
235:assume good faith
1679:
1662:
1566:
1523:Duplicate !vote:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1477:Fars News Agency
1436:
1412:
1387:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1336:
1313:
1310:
1307:
1292:
1285:a passing fad.--
1261:
1258:
1255:
1244:
1214:AhmedGahelrasoul
1211:
1209:
1198:AhmedGahelrasoul
1190:
1181:
1159:
1037:
1034:
1031:
913:Syrian Civil War
730:
677:
655:
589:
587:
580:
508:
417:
306:
294:
278:
262:
243:
213:, but instead a
204:
197:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1669:deletion review
1658:
1516:
1491:and says, that
1395:
1356:
1353:
1350:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1259:
1256:
1253:
1191:
1160:
1035:
1032:
1029:
656:
612:Darkness Shines
601:209,000 results
599:Seems notable?
583:
576:
574:
319:Darkness Shines
296:
284:
268:
252:
239:sign your posts
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1685:
1683:
1674:
1673:
1653:
1652:
1635:
1618:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1571:
1554:
1553:
1539:
1538:
1512:
1511:
1473:Jihad Al-Nikah
1462:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1414:
1413:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1342:
1341:
1324:
1323:
1298:
1297:
1272:
1271:
1231:
1230:
1183:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1135:Jason from nyc
1092:
1091:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1048:
1047:
1017:
1016:
996:
995:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
928:
927:
917:Jason from nyc
889:
888:
862:
861:
844:
830:Bengali people
821:articles. This
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
794:Jason from nyc
777:
776:
750:
749:
716:Jihad al Nikah
709:
679:
645:
625:
624:
623:
622:
605:76,900 results
594:
593:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
535:
534:
513:
491:
490:
470:
449:
448:
427:
408:
398:Jason from nyc
391:
372:
371:
370:
369:
348:
347:
310:
309:
205:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1684:
1672:
1670:
1666:
1661:
1655:
1654:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1604:Comfort women
1601:
1597:
1594:
1593:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1570:
1564:
1563:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1548:
1544:
1541:
1540:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1524:
1514:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1445:
1440:
1434:
1433:
1428:
1424:
1422:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1391:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1367:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1334:
1333:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1296:
1290:
1289:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1242:
1241:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1187:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1127:point of view
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
998:
997:
994:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
976:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
944:
943:
939:
935:
930:
929:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
897:
893:
892:
891:
890:
887:
883:
879:
875:
872:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
860:
856:
852:
848:
845:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
820:
816:
813:
812:
803:
799:
795:
791:
788:
785:
781:
780:
779:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
746:
742:
738:
734:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
710:
708:
704:
700:
696:
691:
690:WP:GOOGLEHITS
687:
683:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
653:
649:
646:
644:
640:
636:
635:
630:
627:
626:
621:
617:
613:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
595:
592:
588:
586:
581:
579:
572:
568:
565:
564:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
512:
506:
505:
500:
496:
493:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
471:
468:
464:
460:
456:
451:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
428:
426:
421:
416:
412:
409:
407:
403:
399:
395:
392:
390:
386:
382:
377:
374:
373:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
329:
328:
324:
320:
316:
304:
300:
292:
288:
282:
276:
272:
266:
260:
256:
250:
246:
242:
240:
236:
230:
226:
225:
220:
216:
212:
211:
206:
203:
199:
198:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1659:
1656:
1637:
1620:
1595:
1574:
1560:
1542:
1522:
1492:
1489:sexual jihad
1488:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1447:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1402:24.90.57.129
1396:— Preceding
1384:
1361:
1330:
1316:
1286:
1278:
1264:
1238:
1192:— Preceding
1185:
1161:— Preceding
1155:
1076:
1040:
1020:
1001:
979:
978:
895:
846:
814:
715:
711:
682:Fence sitter
681:
657:— Preceding
647:
632:
628:
584:
577:
573:, though. --
571:Sexual jihad
566:
524:BengaliHindu
515:
502:
499:Sex drive-in
494:
429:
410:
393:
375:
354:
332:
313:
302:
290:
281:sockpuppetry
274:
263:; suspected
258:
244:
232:
228:
222:
214:
208:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
1224:) has made
1113:Mohammedbas
1081:Mohammedbas
743:) has made
733:AchisDeGeth
720:AchisDeGeth
650:, this was
415:regentspark
161:free images
1575:phenomenon
1526:Markus2685
1501:Markus2685
1452:Wikifan115
934:MezzoMezzo
663:CygnusPius
381:MezzoMezzo
359:Markus2685
215:discussion
1665:talk page
1625:Chris1636
1608:Bisswajit
1547:Lankiveil
1485:Al Arabia
1427:Sex jihad
1283:Mary Toft
1167:Tareq2013
1099:IRWolfie-
1060:IRWolfie-
1025:WP:NOTNEO
1023:- a hoax
956:IRWolfie-
952:WP:DICDEF
896:Sex Jihad
789:and many
784:Sex Jihad
699:IRWolfie-
686:link bait
479:• Gene93k
459:• Gene93k
271:canvassed
265:canvassed
224:consensus
76:Sex Jihad
68:Sex Jihad
37:talk page
1667:or in a
1579:DavidK93
1562:Milowent
1534:contribs
1432:Milowent
1398:unsigned
1332:Milowent
1288:Milowent
1240:Milowent
1222:contribs
1206:contribs
1194:unsigned
1175:contribs
1163:unsigned
901:War Rape
851:DavidK93
741:contribs
695:WP:EVENT
671:contribs
659:unsigned
504:Milowent
303:username
297:{{subst:
291:username
285:{{subst:
275:username
269:{{subst:
259:username
253:{{subst:
120:View log
54:Darkwind
39:or in a
1600:Bearian
1237:keep.--
1189:rumors.
1006:Bearian
984:Bearian
878:Benfold
834:Benfold
766:Benfold
652:covered
548:Benfold
438:Nwlaw63
420:comment
267:users:
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
1638:Delete
1596:Delete
1543:Delete
1471:. The
1448:Delete
1186:Delete
1156:Delete
1077:Delete
1021:Delete
1002:Delete
948:WP:NEO
871:WP:NEO
819:NOTNEO
815:Delete
762:WP:NEO
609:WP:NEO
544:WP:NEO
520:WP:NEO
518:: Not
434:WP:NEO
430:Delete
411:Delete
376:Delete
333:Delete
315:WP:NEO
139:Google
97:delete
909:Jihad
578:Auric
245:Note:
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
1646:talk
1629:talk
1621:Keep
1612:talk
1598:per
1583:talk
1530:talk
1505:talk
1495:see
1465:Keep
1456:talk
1406:talk
1385:Keep
1351:Luke
1306:Luke
1279:must
1254:Luke
1218:talk
1202:talk
1171:talk
1139:talk
1117:talk
1103:talk
1085:talk
1064:talk
1030:Luke
1010:talk
988:talk
980:Keep
960:talk
938:talk
921:talk
882:talk
855:talk
847:Keep
838:talk
798:talk
770:talk
737:talk
724:talk
712:Keep
703:talk
667:talk
648:Keep
639:talk
634:Cirt
629:Keep
616:talk
585:talk
567:Keep
552:talk
528:talk
516:Keep
495:Keep
483:talk
463:talk
442:talk
432:per
402:talk
394:Keep
385:talk
363:talk
355:Keep
341:talk
323:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
1642:BDD
764:.--
546:.--
337:jni
299:csp
295:or
287:csm
255:spa
229:not
189:TWL
118:– (
52:. —
1648:)
1631:)
1614:)
1606:--
1585:)
1565:•
1532:•
1521:—
1507:)
1499:--
1458:)
1435:•
1408:)
1357:94
1354:no
1335:•
1312:94
1309:no
1291:•
1260:94
1257:no
1243:•
1220:•
1212:—
1204:•
1177:)
1173:•
1141:)
1119:)
1105:)
1087:)
1066:)
1036:94
1033:no
1012:)
1004:.
990:)
962:)
954:.
940:)
923:)
903:?
884:)
857:)
840:)
800:)
792:.
772:)
739:•
731:—
726:)
705:)
673:)
669:•
641:)
618:)
554:)
530:)
507:•
485:)
477:.
465:)
457:.
444:)
404:)
387:)
365:)
357:--
343:)
325:)
305:}}
293:}}
283::
277:}}
261:}}
251::
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
1644:(
1627:(
1610:(
1581:(
1552:.
1528:(
1503:(
1454:(
1419:'
1404:(
1392:)
1388:(
1216:(
1200:(
1169:(
1137:(
1115:(
1101:(
1083:(
1062:(
1008:(
986:(
958:(
950:/
936:(
919:(
880:(
853:(
836:(
796:(
768:(
735:(
722:(
701:(
665:(
637:(
614:(
550:(
526:(
481:(
461:(
440:(
422:)
418:(
400:(
383:(
361:(
339:(
321:(
307:.
301:|
289:|
273:|
257:|
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
