288:. However, notability is satisfied because there has been nontrivial coverage in multiple reliable sources, and notnews is satisfied because (to quote notnews), "news coverage goes beyond a single event". (The events in question include the Sunday Tribune's initial breakage of the story, Sean Sherlock's intervention, the apologies, the Pope's intervention, and the Commission of Inquiry, which all receive separate coverage.)
167:
Yes, but the Miami article covers events over a couple of decades. This appears to deal with the fallout from a report required by processes which were put in place and then ignored. If it had caused the processes to be put in place in the first place, I'd agree it was notable enough for an
150:
197:. The subject-matter is quite obviously notable, a major scandal involving Church and State - so notable in fact that it has prompted the involvement of the Pope (would you like to tell Benedict that he's made a mistake?)
409:
The
Augustinian cleric launched the atonement walk after what he described as "the inexcusable" Diocese of Cloyne abuse allegations. He said he found these to be "the lowest ebb" of a sad, tragic story for the
360:
Technically a series of related events comprises an episode. (The distinction between an event and an episode canbe argued endlessly, it's basically a matter of analytical convenience.) One
Episode is still
87:
82:
91:
74:
120:
414:"Hundreds of supporters of a protesting priest will cheer his arrival in the Pro-Cathedral today on the final leg of his marathon 'atonement' walk from Cork to Dublin."
336:
I suppose it's a tenable point of view that this is "one event" that spans several months, but I should think that stretches the meaning of "one event" rather too far.—
418:"Fr Michael also confirmed that he had had a number of calls from victims of abuse who were interested in what he was doing and the message he was promoting.
78:
400:
153:, where there is a keep consensus. Also, this affair is very notable in Ireland, you would know it if you read the Irish newspapers on a regular basis.
211:
On quite a few counts, yes--but not this one in particular. I don't think papal action necessarily indicates notability in this case, though.--
70:
62:
396:
458:
441:
369:
354:
309:
267:
243:
220:
206:
177:
162:
140:
56:
449:
This is now part of history as are the other articles in the parent category. Certainly notable. Needs improvment? Then improve it.
365:
for the details of that episode. It should be included only if and to the extent that the episode casts light on the broader issue.
347:
302:
17:
334:
I'd just like to note that if it's one event with several aspects, then those aspects are remarkably widely-separated in time.
427:
473:
36:
472:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
216:
173:
136:
435:
422:
387:. The article was no sooner begun than it was nominated for deletion. Lots of points missing such as
344:
299:
186:
127:
No evidence of particular notability is given here. Seems like just more piling on, and
Knowledge is
263:
212:
169:
132:
285:
231:
128:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
454:
239:
189:- you'll have to show that the subject of this article is notable enough in it's own right.
432:
337:
292:
291:
Therefore, no valid reason for deletion survives a serious examination of the subject.—
259:
202:
420:
There is certainly no shortage of sources if this were handled in the correct way. --
362:
158:
50:
108:
450:
281:
235:
392:
388:
366:
253:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
198:
154:
151:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sexual abuse scandal in Miami archdiocese
466:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
258:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
476:). No further edits should be made to this page.
319:to Wikinews (is there a procedure for this?).
8:
321:(Transwiki not possible for legal reasons.)
71:Sexual abuse scandal in Cloyne diocese
63:Sexual abuse scandal in Cloyne diocese
7:
383:, improve substantially and perhaps
24:
280:Grounds for deletion cited are
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
230:per nomination - Knowledge is
1:
493:
459:04:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
442:13:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
370:22:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
355:22:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
310:21:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
268:10:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
244:12:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
221:11:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
207:10:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
178:20:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
163:19:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
141:19:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
57:01:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
469:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
395:and doesn't the "
270:
484:
471:
440:
438:
430:
425:
352:
342:
327:
326:
307:
297:
257:
255:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
480:
474:deletion review
467:
436:
428:
423:
421:
405:sort of mention
351:
348:
338:
306:
303:
293:
251:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
490:
488:
479:
478:
462:
461:
444:
397:walking priest
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
349:
329:
328:
313:
304:
272:
271:
256:
248:
247:
246:
225:
224:
223:
192:
191:
190:
180:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
477:
475:
470:
464:
463:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
443:
439:
434:
431:
426:
419:
415:
411:
406:
404:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
378:
371:
368:
364:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
345:
343:
341:
333:
332:
331:
330:
324:
320:
318:
314:
312:
311:
308:
300:
298:
296:
289:
287:
283:
277:
274:
273:
269:
265:
261:
254:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:SarekOfVulcan
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
188:
187:WP:OTHERSTUFF
184:
181:
179:
175:
171:
170:SarekOfVulcan
166:
165:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
133:SarekOfVulcan
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
468:
465:
446:
417:
413:
408:
402:
384:
380:
339:
335:
323:Merge/rename
322:
316:
315:
294:
290:
279:
275:
252:
227:
194:
182:
146:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
363:WP:NOT#NEWS
399:" himself
340:S Marshall
295:S Marshall
282:notability
168:article.--
317:Transwiki
260:Fritzpoll
410:Church."
401:deserve
121:View log
286:NOTNEWS
232:NOTNEWS
183:Comment
129:NOTNEWS
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
451:Hmains
385:rename
236:Vidkun
228:Delete
185:: See
149:, see
116:delete
92:delete
437:wicke
367:Rd232
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
455:talk
447:keep
403:some
393:this
389:this
381:Keep
350:Cont
305:Cont
284:and
276:Keep
264:talk
240:talk
217:talk
203:talk
199:PiCo
195:Keep
174:talk
159:talk
147:Keep
137:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
429:dle
424:can
234:.--
155:ADM
457:)
416:,
412:,
407:?
391:,
266:)
242:)
219:)
205:)
176:)
161:)
139:)
131:.
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
453:(
433:•
346:/
325:(
301:/
278:.
262:(
238:(
215:(
201:(
172:(
157:(
135:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.