701:
features significant involvement (ie. one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career," which is a consideration when giving thought to the involvement of the many Indian notables. I find it hard to believe that such films "never" received attention in the
Kannada language. So since it had not yet been done, I've asked for assistance in sourcing from
700:
As for national archives and awards, the jury is still out. I am still looking to verify if "the film was selected for preservation in a national archive" or received "a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking"... but that OEN list contains more considerations. There is also "The film
503:
before nominating this article for deletion, I was not able to find any, the AfD process gives extra time to find valid sources, unfortunatelly, the citations added are just a one and a half line review and an article about the death of comedian
Vadiraj (claimed in the article to be director of the
574:
is no reason to toss away possibly improvable stubs over difficulties in finding non-English sources for non-English pre-internet films. I loked at the author's talk page, and wonder if he has been chased away yet, or not. I hope he remains and adds the required souring.
508:
shows ways that notability can be established for older films, but in my opinion, it is clear that this film does not meet those guidelines. If reliable sources in any language are found to meet the guidelines for inclusion I will be very happy to change my
603:
I have much less experience than you and I am learning every day, so I sincerely thank you for the information you sent me. Let me try to explain to you in more detail why I nominated the films and try to show you that it was not just a frivolous
555:, specially considering the difficulties inherent in sourcing pre-1990s Indian film articles within a seven-day period. I appreciate your concern with the author giving us only basic information, but such may lead to more with the right eyes.
628:, I can understand the difficulty on finding reliable sources, and if there would have been an unsourced claim of notability in the articles, I would have tag them instead of nominating them, but in my opinion there is no such claim.
806:. We have a couple of sources, and the film stars and was directed by notable people - it needs expanding rather than deleting. I'd say tag it to say it needs better sourcing and give it a bit more time - there's no rush.
170:
277:
403:
340:
831:. The article is not a policy violation and it serves the project and its readers to have it remain and be improved over time and through regular editing as Kannada editors are able.
686:
If I made a mistake in the interpretation of this policies I do apologize, my intention is to help, not hinder the project, so I will thankfully accept any guidance you can give me.--
123:
734:
Good idea, if it is notable they should be able to show it, and if it so happens that any of those criteria you mention are met then I fully agree with you that it should be kept.--
164:
664:
The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.
271:
397:
334:
437:
222:
620:. The guidelines and recommendations you cited all seem to assume that the content is or is claimed to be notable (even if it is not properly sourced).
130:
96:
91:
100:
83:
562:, and a very reasonable expectation that these films did receive some non-English coverage not available online. As the film is at least
596:
and I do hope that if the films are indeed notable they remain and get improved. I will copy below my answer to the other AfD to satisfy
567:
17:
185:
484:
tells us that pre-1990s Indian films are difficult to source online. Not being sourcable online is not automatically non-notable.
292:
152:
527:, but your lack of success is not automatically that of others, and unless you are a Kannada-reading Wikipedian who understands
259:
789:. Title is subtle, but if it was produced and played at theatres there is no reason to contest the existence of the movie.
53:
535:. I would hope this gets re-listed several times, as seven days is not always best for the project. I urge you to consider
566:, we do not have a policy violation... just an issue that requires Kannada eyes. Tagging for issues and perhaps notifying
418:
763:
355:
739:
702:
691:
514:
385:
210:
862:
322:
40:
146:
253:
843:
815:
798:
777:
743:
725:
695:
587:
518:
452:
236:
214:
65:
609:
840:
722:
667:
The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release.
584:
449:
142:
87:
794:
249:
379:
735:
687:
510:
316:
206:
192:
617:
552:
504:
film) the article makes no mention of the film. Neither one establish the needed notability for inclusion.
480:
should be able to provide non-english sources, even if only scans of hardcopy sources unavailable online.
299:
231:
858:
774:
632:
473:
375:
36:
661:
Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.
472:, not deletion. This film article is not unsourcable. As this film is one of those of Kannada notable
312:
655:
it is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.
833:
715:
681:
The film is "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.
577:
493:
442:
79:
71:
548:
202:
790:
670:
The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.
624:
stresses in point 4 that the subject must be notable, and that it should be sourced, after reading
425:
411:
348:
285:
178:
625:
528:
524:
481:
465:
362:
158:
652:
The articles do not make any of the included notability claims, I could see no indication that:
647:
612:
is not an issue here, especially after the new sources you found which clearly establish it. My
505:
265:
631:
My assumption here is that a film is not automatically notable for having a notable actor like
811:
710:
226:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
857:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
532:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
477:
643:
621:
605:
597:
571:
559:
544:
536:
558:
The involvement of major
Kannada film notables allows a consideration of notability under
500:
391:
328:
563:
807:
636:
593:
570:
for assistance might have been reasonable. Not saying you did anything wrong, but
540:
57:
117:
675:
The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
658:
The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:
706:
766:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
476:, it certainly had coverage. I would expect Indian members familiar with
539:
and use a little restraint before nominating more new stubs about
851:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
499:, As with the other two articles I nominated, I did try to find
678:
The film was selected for preservation in a national archive.
600:
for other editors as the reasons apply for the 3 articles:
828:
824:
469:
461:
113:
109:
105:
410:
347:
284:
177:
642:
Since I could not find substantial coverage to meet
773:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
424:
361:
298:
191:
464:after it being contributed. Being unsourced means
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
865:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
436:Note: This debate has been included in the
221:Note: This debate has been included in the
438:list of India-related deletion discussions
435:
220:
703:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force
523:I am sorry that you were unsuccessful in
223:list of Film-related deletion discussions
592:I do agree with you, I don´t know about
568:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Karnataka
531:, your being "clear" is a subjective
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
823:a suitable stub which has gone from
553:AFD is not intended to force cleanup
543:after such short waiting periods.
24:
201:Unsourced article does not meet
1:
844:21:23, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
816:19:54, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
799:12:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
778:19:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
744:21:19, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
726:15:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
696:09:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
588:05:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
519:23:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
453:08:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
237:20:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
215:15:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
66:01:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
635:in its cast, or for been a
608:. I do agree with you that
882:
547:instructs that immediate
854:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
460:No need to send to AFD
537:suggested alternatives
711:WikiProject Karnataka
80:Seethe Alla Savithri
72:Seethe Alla Savithri
707:Cinema of Karnataka
736:Crystallizedcarbon
688:Crystallizedcarbon
511:Crystallizedcarbon
207:Crystallizedcarbon
48:The result was
780:
551:is not required.
455:
307:writer/director:(
239:
54:non-admin closure
873:
856:
836:
772:
768:
718:
616:concern is with
610:WP:Verifiability
580:
496:
478:Kannada language
445:
429:
428:
414:
366:
365:
351:
303:
302:
288:
234:
229:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
881:
880:
876:
875:
874:
872:
871:
870:
869:
863:deletion review
852:
834:
761:
716:
578:
494:
443:
371:
308:
245:
232:
227:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
879:
877:
868:
867:
847:
846:
818:
801:
791:VegasCasinoKid
783:
782:
781:
770:
769:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
729:
728:
684:
683:
682:
679:
676:
673:
672:
671:
668:
665:
662:
656:
650:
640:
629:
601:
556:
486:
485:
470:encourage work
457:
456:
432:
431:
370:alt director:(
368:
305:
241:
240:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
878:
866:
864:
860:
855:
849:
848:
845:
842:
841:
838:
837:
830:
826:
822:
819:
817:
813:
809:
805:
802:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
784:
779:
776:
771:
767:
765:
760:
759:
745:
741:
737:
733:
732:
731:
730:
727:
724:
723:
720:
719:
712:
708:
704:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
680:
677:
674:
669:
666:
663:
660:
659:
657:
654:
653:
651:
649:
645:
641:
638:
634:
633:Vishnuvardhan
630:
627:
623:
619:
618:WP:Notability
615:
611:
607:
602:
599:
595:
594:Kannada films
591:
590:
589:
586:
585:
582:
581:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
554:
550:
546:
542:
541:Kannada films
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
507:
502:
498:
497:
490:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:Vishnuvardhan
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
454:
451:
450:
447:
446:
439:
434:
433:
427:
423:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
377:
374:
373:Find sources:
369:
364:
360:
357:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
314:
311:
310:Find sources:
306:
301:
297:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
251:
248:
247:Find sources:
243:
242:
238:
235:
230:
224:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
853:
850:
839:
832:
820:
803:
786:
775:NorthAmerica
762:
721:
714:
646:I looked at
637:Kannada film
613:
583:
576:
492:
448:
441:
421:
415:
407:
400:
394:
388:
382:
372:
358:
352:
344:
337:
331:
325:
319:
309:
295:
289:
281:
274:
268:
262:
256:
246:
228:Everymorning
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
398:free images
335:free images
272:free images
205:guidelines
165:free images
564:verifiable
549:perfection
244:alt name:(
233:talk to me
203:WP:NOTFILM
859:talk page
835:Schmidt,
787:Weak keep
717:Schmidt,
626:WP:INDAFD
579:Schmidt,
529:WP:INDAFD
525:WP:BEFORE
482:WP:INDAFD
466:WP:BEFORE
462:ten hours
444:Schmidt,
37:talk page
861:or in a
764:Relisted
648:WP:MOVIE
506:WP:MOVIE
124:View log
39:or in a
808:Squinge
533:opinion
509:vote.--
495:Schmidt
404:WP refs
392:scholar
341:WP refs
329:scholar
278:WP refs
266:scholar
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
58:Natg 19
644:WP:GNG
622:WP:YFA
606:WP:JNN
598:WP:JNN
572:WP:JNN
560:WP:OEN
545:WP:WIP
491:Hello
376:Google
313:Google
250:Google
143:Google
101:delete
501:WP:RS
419:JSTOR
380:books
356:JSTOR
317:books
293:JSTOR
254:books
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
829:THIS
825:this
821:Keep
812:talk
804:Keep
795:talk
740:talk
709:and
692:talk
614:only
515:talk
412:FENS
386:news
349:FENS
323:news
286:FENS
260:news
211:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
50:keep
827:to
468:to
426:TWL
363:TWL
300:TWL
193:TWL
122:– (
52:. (
814:)
797:)
742:)
713:.
705:,
694:)
517:)
440:.
406:)
343:)
280:)
225:.
213:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:)
810:(
793:(
738:(
690:(
639:.
513:(
430:)
422:·
416:·
408:·
401:·
395:·
389:·
383:·
378:(
367:)
359:·
353:·
345:·
338:·
332:·
326:·
320:·
315:(
304:)
296:·
290:·
282:·
275:·
269:·
263:·
257:·
252:(
209:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.