Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sharfuddin Shah Wilayat - Knowledge

Source 📝

488: 302:: I know the sourcing is bit weak, but subject appears to be a notable person. The problem is, Indian media only recently has started keeping archives and related historical books are very few available online and even they having snippet view are completely useless. Here are three sources that suggest significance of subject, - 369:
your comparison to a "parish priest" fails to distinguish between a priest and a founder of a religious sect - in Amroha, the guy is revered much like saints are in Christianity. The question is whether there is enough sources to keep the person in a separate article, or merge him to the article on
393:
goes, that article is a similarly specious wallow in "highly respected" OR puffery that should be nuked right along with this one. (Nom could bundle that into this AfD at his leisure...and follow the blue links in both articles to more of the iceberg under the
409:
please? So that we know what you are talking about. I have personally "nuked" a few Islam-related promos, but I am surprised anyone would suggest to delete Amroha Naqvis. Unless, of course, the traditions of South Asia are not something you are best at.
426: 395: 364: 344: 168: 503:. It's not that I insist, but it would be weird if that person, even if notable only locally in India, could not be found somewhere on Knowledge. Whether he warrants a separate article, that's another question. Regards, 162: 121: 425:
I said the Sadaat Amroha article was specious, not suspicious. (It's written in the typical puffery-laden OR style of all of these Sufi AfDs, including this one.)
279: 259: 219: 361:. Agreed that this is of little relevance to the western reader, but the guy is the founder of a fairly recognisable religious community in Northern India. 239: 94: 89: 98: 389:
If you stipulate to there being a question as to whether RS exist and that the article is as ugly as sin, then suggesting 'keep' is improper. As far as
128: 370:
his community. However, seeing that the article is fairly well linked to, I am inclined to keep it. Agreed that it needs some serious editing work.
81: 495: 303: 468:
There does not currently seem to be evidence of notability for the subject. Claiming notability isn't enough, in and of itself, to satisfy even
306: 494:
Google returns less than I thought but still a few hits to consider. There is a lengthy article about the person on an Indian news TV website
183: 150: 570: 498: 17: 144: 85: 579: 542: 513: 481: 460: 431: 420: 400: 380: 349: 323: 291: 271: 251: 231: 211: 200: 63: 140: 522: 598: 40: 190: 343:
Typically of these, this article is OR puffery without any RS concerning some long-dead political appointee.
77: 69: 574: 594: 532: 36: 566: 477: 156: 456: 318: 207: 176: 510: 417: 377: 287: 267: 247: 227: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
593:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
501: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
553:- Per Kashmiri, subject has received well amount of coverage in numerous reliable sources. 554: 500:, and, importantly, there is an annual Urs festival organised for the saint at his shrine 487: 473: 452: 312: 203: 505: 469: 448: 412: 406: 390: 372: 358: 51: 283: 263: 243: 223: 115: 309: 56: 525:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
199:
There was some suggestion that this problem plagued article be deleted at
587:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
341:
Sufi publication. It'd be like every parish priest getting one."
451:, per discussion above. Article now has one inline citation.-- 333:"There's an apparent project afoot to create an article on 111: 107: 103: 175: 531:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 202:so I'm throwing it up for discussion as suggested. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 601:). No further edits should be made to this page. 311:. I'm attempting to find more in the meanwhile. 331:(do not merge). My comment at the other AfD: 189: 8: 278:Note: This debate has been included in the 258:Note: This debate has been included in the 238:Note: This debate has been included in the 218:Note: This debate has been included in the 280:list of People-related deletion discussions 497:, a school in Pakistan is named after him 405:Can you quote a single suspicious link in 277: 260:list of Islam-related deletion discussions 257: 237: 220:list of India-related deletion discussions 217: 240:list of Iraq-related deletion discussions 7: 504: 411: 371: 24: 486: 472:which is sort of a first step. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 580:06:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 543:04:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC) 514:09:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC) 482:03:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC) 432:04:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC) 64:05:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 461:14:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 421:23:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC) 401:23:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC) 381:14:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC) 350:10:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 324:04:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 292:02:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 272:02:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 252:02:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 232:02:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 212:19:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC) 618: 590:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 78:Sharfuddin Shah Wilayat 70:Sharfuddin Shah Wilayat 365:Раціональне анархіст 337:name mentioned in 48:The result was 578: 545: 294: 274: 254: 234: 609: 592: 564: 561: 558: 540: 536: 530: 528: 526: 512: 508: 490: 419: 415: 379: 375: 368: 321: 315: 194: 193: 179: 131: 119: 101: 61: 34: 617: 616: 612: 611: 610: 608: 607: 606: 605: 599:deletion review 588: 559: 556: 546: 538: 534: 521: 519: 506: 413: 373: 362: 319: 313: 136: 127: 92: 76: 73: 57: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 615: 613: 604: 603: 583: 582: 529: 518: 517: 516: 484: 463: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 384: 383: 352: 326: 296: 295: 275: 255: 235: 197: 196: 133: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 614: 602: 600: 596: 591: 585: 584: 581: 576: 572: 571:Contributions 568: 563: 562: 552: 548: 547: 544: 541: 527: 524: 515: 511: 509: 502: 499: 496: 493: 489: 485: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 464: 462: 458: 454: 450: 449:Sadaat Amroha 446: 443: 442: 433: 430: 429: 424: 423: 422: 418: 416: 408: 407:Sadaat Amroha 404: 403: 402: 399: 398: 392: 391:Sadaat Amroha 388: 387: 386: 385: 382: 378: 376: 366: 360: 359:Sadaat Amroha 356: 353: 351: 348: 347: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 325: 322: 316: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 276: 273: 269: 265: 261: 256: 253: 249: 245: 241: 236: 233: 229: 225: 221: 216: 215: 214: 213: 209: 205: 201: 192: 188: 185: 182: 178: 174: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 142: 139: 138:Find sources: 134: 130: 126: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 60: 54: 53: 52:Sadaat Amroha 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 589: 586: 555: 550: 520: 491: 465: 447:or merge to 444: 427: 396: 357:or merge to 354: 345: 340: 336: 332: 328: 299: 198: 186: 180: 172: 165: 159: 153: 147: 137: 124: 58: 49: 47: 31: 28: 320:Let's talk! 163:free images 474:MezzoMezzo 595:talk page 551:Weak Keep 453:DThomsen8 394:surface.) 314:Anupmehra 300:Weak Keep 284:• Gene93k 264:• Gene93k 244:• Gene93k 224:• Gene93k 204:Legacypac 50:merge to 37:talk page 597:or in a 523:Relisted 507:kashmiri 492:Comment: 414:kashmiri 374:kashmiri 122:View log 39:or in a 169:WP refs 157:scholar 95:protect 90:history 557:Occult 539:MERICA 470:WP:GNG 466:Delete 329:Delete 141:Google 99:delete 339:every 335:every 184:JSTOR 145:books 129:Stats 116:views 108:watch 104:links 59:Nakon 16:< 567:Talk 560:Zone 535:ORTH 478:talk 457:talk 445:Keep 355:Keep 288:talk 268:talk 248:talk 228:talk 208:talk 177:FENS 151:news 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 575:Log 428:Pax 397:Pax 346:Pax 191:TWL 120:– ( 573:• 569:• 480:) 459:) 308:, 305:, 290:) 282:. 270:) 262:. 250:) 242:. 230:) 222:. 210:) 171:) 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 55:. 577:) 565:( 549:' 537:A 533:N 476:( 455:( 367:: 363:@ 317:- 286:( 266:( 246:( 226:( 206:( 195:) 187:· 181:· 173:· 166:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 143:( 135:( 132:) 125:· 118:) 80:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sadaat Amroha
Nakon
05:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Sharfuddin Shah Wilayat
Sharfuddin Shah Wilayat
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Legacypac

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.