438:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
443:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
442:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
200:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
388:
246:. Article needs significant improvement, but I believe the subject received enough coverage over her injuries and attempts to continue to model despite paralysis to justify an independent article. Weirdly, she's also in the news this week as a peacock rancher (or whatever).
158:
314:
365:
Of course, like in others AfDs about non-notable playmates, you may chose not to provide evidence for what you state and simply expect a gullible closing admin to take your word for that. --
434:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
119:
189:
152:
291:
392:
386:
271:
268:
225:
News coverage 10 years after being centerfold, seems clearly notable. Article needs improvement with additional references, not deletion.
92:
87:
96:
17:
79:
255:
173:
140:
439:
476:
36:
390:
251:
447:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
134:
475:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
399:
349:
249:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
461:
424:
403:
374:
353:
329:
306:
283:
259:
238:
216:
130:
61:
358:
Coverage about her playmatehood is not automatically disqualified, but is usually trivial, as explained in
450:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
180:
83:
395:
345:
166:
435:
231:
359:
341:
457:
325:
302:
279:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
146:
444:
385:
No, I expect the other people to look at that google news search and easily determine that
206:
366:
344:
with her news coverage. Coverage about her playmatehood is not disqualified from the GNG.
210:
75:
67:
445:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
417:
226:
453:
321:
298:
275:
50:
113:
362:. Have you seen some non-trivial coverage about her that you would share with us?
247:
469:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
394:
plus the bizarre peacock articles are extensive coverage.
315:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
165:
205:are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the
179:
190:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
479:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
313:Note: This debate has been included in the
290:Note: This debate has been included in the
292:list of People-related deletion discussions
312:
289:
267:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
207:general notability guideline
496:
330:20:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
307:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
284:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
260:17:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
239:03:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
217:02:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
472:Please do not modify it.
340:- easily passes GNG and
201:solely related to their
32:Please do not modify it.
462:13:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
425:00:49, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
404:21:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
375:20:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
354:14:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
269:WikiProject Pornography
62:01:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
415:per Morbidthoughts.--
252:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
194:Playmate of the Month
198:Playmate of the Year
440:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
452:
423:
371:
332:
318:
309:
295:
272:list of deletions
236:
214:
487:
474:
448:
422:
372:
369:
319:
296:
286:
232:
229:
212:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
44:The result was
34:
495:
494:
490:
489:
488:
486:
485:
484:
483:
477:deletion review
470:
432:Procedural Keep
367:
266:
235:
227:
192:. Being chosen
126:
90:
76:Sharry Konopski
74:
71:
68:Sharry Konopski
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
493:
491:
482:
481:
465:
464:
428:
427:
409:
408:
407:
406:
396:Morbidthoughts
380:
379:
378:
377:
363:
346:Morbidthoughts
334:
333:
310:
287:
263:
262:
241:
233:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
492:
480:
478:
473:
467:
466:
463:
459:
455:
451:
446:
441:
437:
433:
430:
429:
426:
420:
419:
414:
411:
410:
405:
401:
397:
393:
391:
389:
387:
384:
383:
382:
381:
376:
373:
364:
361:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
316:
311:
308:
304:
300:
293:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
265:
264:
261:
257:
253:
250:
248:
245:
242:
240:
237:
230:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
208:
204:
199:
195:
191:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
58:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
471:
468:
449:
431:
416:
412:
337:
243:
222:
203:playmatehood
202:
197:
193:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
55:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
153:free images
436:WP:BEFORE
322:• Gene93k
299:• Gene93k
276:• Gene93k
418:Milowent
360:WP:BASIC
342:WP:BASIC
120:View log
454:Carrite
368:Damiens
211:Damiens
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
51:postdlf
131:Google
97:delete
228:Monty
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
458:talk
413:Keep
400:talk
350:talk
338:Keep
326:talk
303:talk
280:talk
256:talk
244:Keep
223:Keep
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
57:talk
46:KEEP
370:.rf
320:--
234:845
213:.rf
196:or
181:TWL
118:– (
48:.
460:)
421:•
402:)
352:)
328:)
317:.
305:)
294:.
282:)
274:.
258:)
209:.
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
456:(
398:(
348:(
324:(
301:(
297:—
278:(
254:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.