618:, 3 of which all deal with the same event. The CNBC article is a very good citation. The other two articles are nice, but very brief and not in-depth. But going through the rest of the citations on News, those were the only 6 good citations on News, the rest were either trivial mentions or press releases. I'm not keen on either of Graeme Bartlett's cites, the second is merely the posting of a lawsuit. Newspapers had nada. Books had only trivial mentions or recaps of the lawsuit versus the Air Force. However, the number of places where the lawsuit is talked about seems to indicate significance. In addition, there's
518:
614:- Doesn't really matter if I'm pinged or not. I would have looked at this article on Saturday. I usually look at still open discussions on the final day and either close (if they have reached a keep consensus - I'm not an admin so I can't close deletes), comment if warranted, or relist if I think more discussion would be a good thing. Having said all that, on to the article. The article currently has 6 citations, provided by
546:
Read that first paragraph and that's my intention, "notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus". I simply want a better consensus than five and now four
228:(Books particularly found at page 2, fourth from the top "leading provider of rotating apparatus and electrical power system testing, commissioning, repair, maintenance and training" making it likely one of the best links there),
189:
712:
547:
votes (removed the one below). Rather than criticizing my AfDs, AfD could use more useful votes (it's worth noting I've been one of the hardest working AfDers so I doing almost all the work myself).
332:
failure to improve is not a reason to delete. It does appear to be a significant company. It has acquired some other companies too. There are some non-press release info out there such as
142:
183:
285:
664:
263:
706:
429:
as failing GNG. references for local bizjournals are no better than PR. A video on cbslocal, ditto. A notice of a minor court case involving it, irrelevant.
307:
220:
Questionably notable and especially unacceptable current state with not much changing since starting (by a "SBellPR") in June 2009. The best my searches was
149:
115:
110:
221:
119:
102:
225:
204:
171:
17:
76:
727:
229:
337:
694:
165:
642:
449:
383:
756:
344:
40:
673:
655:
633:
602:
588:
558:
534:
511:
491:
467:
440:
421:
398:
374:
348:
321:
299:
277:
255:
84:
583:
553:
506:
486:
333:
316:
294:
272:
250:
161:
106:
572:
211:
688:
752:
669:
598:
394:
98:
90:
36:
532:
417:
372:
365:
340:
241:
684:
720:
578:
548:
525:
501:
481:
311:
289:
267:
245:
197:
476:
I'm hoping for a balanced consensus and I'm not sure if others are going to comment so would you,
568:
177:
734:
368:
mentions though, and there are more out there for those who want to flesh this out further. --
233:
463:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
751:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
615:
543:
529:
517:
413:
369:
361:
55:
700:
623:
497:
477:
436:
409:
357:
237:
652:
459:
62:
338:
http://openjurist.org/613/f2d/1314/shermco-industries-inc-v-secretary-of-air-force
136:
619:
334:
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/video/11166263-eye-on-technology-shermco-industries/
431:
745:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
645:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
452:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
386:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
596:
The content struck above was posted by a confirmed sock.
577:
See user's page to see they are not an authentic user.
132:
128:
124:
719:
196:
622:, and what appears to be several more nice articles.
567:*delete - reads like an advertisement. non-notable.
500:
again in case he missed or never got the other ping.
52:. There is no consensus for deleting this article.
651:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
458:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
392:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
759:). No further edits should be made to this page.
286:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
665:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
733:
364:. I have added some 5-6 cites, none of those
264:list of Business-related deletion discussions
210:
8:
663:Note: This debate has been included in the
306:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:Note: This debate has been included in the
662:
308:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
305:
283:
261:
575:) 06:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)</: -->
7:
24:
528:is not obviously appropriate. --
516:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
674:20:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
656:22:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
634:02:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
603:03:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
589:01:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
559:01:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
535:01:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
512:23:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
492:05:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
468:05:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
441:04:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
422:03:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
399:00:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
375:14:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
85:09:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
349:21:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
322:06:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
300:06:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
278:06:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
256:06:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
776:
748:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
360:and possibly also
99:Shermco Industries
91:Shermco Industries
676:
658:
470:
401:
324:
302:
280:
59:
56:non-admin closure
767:
750:
738:
737:
723:
672:
650:
648:
646:
630:
627:
601:
586:
581:
556:
551:
520:
509:
504:
489:
484:
457:
455:
453:
397:
391:
389:
387:
319:
314:
297:
292:
275:
270:
253:
248:
215:
214:
200:
152:
140:
122:
82:
79:
73:
66:
53:
34:
775:
774:
770:
769:
768:
766:
765:
764:
763:
757:deletion review
746:
680:
668:
659:
641:
639:
628:
625:
597:
584:
579:
554:
549:
507:
502:
487:
482:
471:
448:
446:
402:
393:
382:
380:
366:Graeme Bartlett
341:Graeme Bartlett
317:
312:
295:
290:
273:
268:
251:
246:
242:Graeme Bartlett
157:
148:
113:
97:
94:
77:
71:
67:
64:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
773:
771:
762:
761:
741:
740:
677:
649:
638:
637:
636:
608:
607:
606:
605:
580:SwisterTwister
564:
563:
562:
561:
550:SwisterTwister
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
503:SwisterTwister
483:SwisterTwister
456:
445:
444:
443:
424:
390:
379:
378:
377:
351:
326:
325:
313:SwisterTwister
303:
291:SwisterTwister
281:
269:SwisterTwister
247:SwisterTwister
218:
217:
154:
93:
88:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
772:
760:
758:
754:
749:
743:
742:
736:
732:
729:
726:
722:
718:
714:
711:
708:
705:
702:
699:
696:
693:
690:
686:
683:
682:Find sources:
678:
675:
671:
670:North America
666:
661:
660:
657:
654:
647:
644:
635:
632:
631:
621:
617:
613:
610:
609:
604:
600:
599:North America
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
587:
582:
576:
574:
570:
569:DangerDogWest
560:
557:
552:
545:
542:
536:
533:
531:
527:
524:That kind of
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
510:
505:
499:
495:
494:
493:
490:
485:
479:
475:
474:
473:
472:
469:
465:
461:
454:
451:
442:
438:
434:
433:
428:
425:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
403:
400:
396:
395:North America
388:
385:
376:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
346:
342:
339:
335:
331:
328:
327:
323:
320:
315:
309:
304:
301:
298:
293:
287:
282:
279:
276:
271:
265:
260:
259:
258:
257:
254:
249:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
151:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
92:
89:
87:
86:
83:
80:
74:
68:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
747:
744:
730:
724:
716:
709:
703:
697:
691:
681:
640:
624:
611:
566:
565:
521:
447:
430:
426:
405:
381:
353:
329:
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
145:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
707:free images
408:as meeting
184:free images
616:Sam Sailor
544:Sam Sailor
530:Sam Sailor
414:VMS Mosaic
370:Sam Sailor
236:. Pinging
753:talk page
612:Weak Keep
37:talk page
755:or in a
643:Relisted
498:Onel5969
496:Pinging
478:Onel5969
450:Relisted
384:Relisted
356:, meets
238:Excirial
143:View log
39:or in a
713:WP refs
701:scholar
653:Spartaz
526:pinging
522:Remark:
460:Jenks24
427:Delete.
362:WP:CORP
190:WP refs
178:scholar
116:protect
111:history
65:Supdiop
685:Google
410:WP:GNG
358:WP:GNG
162:Google
120:delete
728:JSTOR
689:books
437:talk
205:JSTOR
166:books
150:Stats
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
721:FENS
695:news
629:5969
626:Onel
620:this
585:talk
573:talk
555:talk
508:talk
488:talk
464:talk
418:talk
406:Keep
354:Keep
345:talk
336:and
330:Keep
318:talk
296:talk
274:talk
252:talk
240:and
234:this
232:and
230:this
226:this
222:this
198:FENS
172:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
50:keep
735:TWL
432:DGG
212:TWL
141:– (
715:)
667:.
480:?
466:)
439:)
420:)
412:.
347:)
310:.
288:.
266:.
244:.
224:,
192:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
75:🔹
739:)
731:·
725:·
717:·
710:·
704:·
698:·
692:·
687:(
679:(
571:(
462:(
435:(
416:(
343:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
146:·
139:)
101:(
81:)
78:C
72:T
69:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.