309:- clear NFOOTY fail, and the coverage noted above is very much along the lines of routine, "this guy could be great in a few years" gossip. What has this player actually done? Answer: nothing, he is just a hot prospect potentially, he hasn't even crashed and burned and generated coverage because of that.
419:. I see no independent non-trivial coverage at all: "young lad does well at little club, goes to big club and might play for them sometime" is no basis for appearance in an encyclopedia. It's decent background material for when
261:(how many 14 year olds get this level of coverage for signing a contract with a club, even a Liverpool/Chelsea size club?). Absolutely no question that he fails NFOOTY, but I *think* he meets GNG based on these sources.
163:
392:
116:
372:
352:
253:
157:
123:
250:
17:
223:
89:
84:
247:
178:
93:
451:
40:
145:
76:
259:
139:
298:
416:
331:
287:
201:
447:
273:
231:
211:
36:
135:
314:
56:
432:
404:
384:
364:
343:
318:
301:
278:
235:
215:
58:
339:
262:
171:
428:
185:
400:
380:
360:
295:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
446:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
227:
207:
327:
291:
197:
310:
53:
335:
294:. Not convinced by the coverage, it's all too "OMG a young prospect!!!" for my liking.
151:
80:
424:
396:
376:
356:
256:
110:
72:
64:
423:
he actually does something worth noting, but that's all. cheers,
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
252:(goes a little beyond just a routine quick interview),
106:
102:
98:
170:
206:
PROD was contested without a reason being provided.
226:'s list of association football-related deletions.
184:
393:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
454:). No further edits should be made to this page.
373:list of Football-related deletion discussions
194:Contested PROD. Concern was that the article
8:
391:Note: This debate has been included in the
371:Note: This debate has been included in the
353:list of England-related deletion discussions
351:Note: This debate has been included in the
222:Note: This discussion has been included in
390:
370:
350:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
326:- Not convinced the article meets
24:
1:
59:00:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
433:10:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
405:23:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
385:23:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
365:23:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
344:23:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
319:10:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
302:20:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
279:20:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
236:20:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
216:20:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
471:
443:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
290:, and seems to fail
275:(tell Luke off here)
224:WikiProject Football
286:- certainly fails
48:The result was
407:
387:
367:
330:. Clearly fails
238:
462:
445:
415:. Clearly fails
271:
268:
265:
221:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
458:
452:deletion review
441:
269:
266:
263:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
468:
466:
457:
456:
436:
435:
409:
408:
388:
368:
347:
346:
321:
304:
281:
240:
239:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
455:
453:
449:
444:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
389:
386:
382:
378:
374:
369:
366:
362:
358:
354:
349:
348:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
303:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
277:
276:
272:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
203:
199:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
442:
439:
420:
417:WP:NFOOTBALL
412:
332:WP:NFOOTBALL
323:
306:
288:WP:NFOOTBALL
283:
274:
243:
202:WP:NFOOTBALL
195:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
246:- based on
228:Sir Sputnik
208:Sir Sputnik
158:free images
311:Fenix down
54:j⚛e decker
448:talk page
397:• Gene93k
377:• Gene93k
357:• Gene93k
244:Weak Keep
73:Sheyi Ojo
65:Sheyi Ojo
37:talk page
450:or in a
425:Struway2
117:View log
39:or in a
336:Michael
299:Snowman
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
421:and if
413:Delete
328:WP:GNG
324:Delete
307:Delete
292:WP:GNG
284:Delete
198:WP:GNG
196:Fails
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
296:Giant
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
429:talk
401:talk
381:talk
361:talk
340:talk
334:. –
315:talk
264:Luke
232:talk
212:talk
200:and
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
186:TWL
115:– (
431:)
403:)
395:.
383:)
375:.
363:)
355:.
342:)
317:)
270:94
267:no
249:,
234:)
214:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
427:(
399:(
379:(
359:(
338:(
313:(
258:/
255:/
230:(
210:(
204:.
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.