335:, but some references might exist somewhere to strengthn her claim to notability. Did she publish more than the one book? Did she have a major influence in her field? Did she win awards for her research and teaching? Did she have notable students who were positively affected by her teaching? Does she serve on panels and boards in her discipline and edit journals?
352:
412:. She is the author of Kargil War: Separating Facts from Fiction (1999), and I think that is enough to prove notability. So, a message saying that the article needs to be improved should be enough. Other than that, she is the director of ISSI, which I believe is the only civilian
230:
the article is an apparent copyvio from the references given. But she might be notable--If the article is rewritten in a proper way, it would help to have a list of her publications. This is not included in the references provided:
375:
136:
110:
299:. Again, absent significant sources to the contrary, this person really just doesn't yet seem notable enough for a dedicated encyclopedic entry.
83:
78:
354:, and those include a bunch of solid, serious news hits. (Although I must admit her interview on Larry Flynt's website is one I skipped).
87:
234:
says it is "available on demand" It is difficult to evaluate academic people who do not have a current list of their publications online.
70:
17:
398:
it's hard to establish notability, but my fellow
Wikipedians do bring up a good point of in Pakistan she may be much more notable.
371:
435:
36:
434:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
420:
402:
390:
362:
339:
323:
303:
291:
275:
252:
240:
219:
192:
173:
145:
125:
52:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
122:
317:
161:
74:
300:
261:
386:
249:
288:
213:
272:
312:
66:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
332:
185:
382:
355:
284:
208:
189:
169:
142:
49:
417:
104:
399:
336:
201:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
378:
413:
268:
165:
236:
265:
232:
428:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
188:, and I see no evidence of any notable impact beyond academia.
260:
Notably, she is cited as a highly respected expert in
100:
96:
92:
331:
The sources furnished do not show that she satisfies
206:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
137:list of Academics and educators-related deletions
438:). No further edits should be made to this page.
381:portrays Mazari's importance and notability. --
8:
155:. Notability established. Sources given.
135:: This debate has been included in the
117:No sources, notability not established.
374:, gets some good hits on news search
283:Notable expert that has been cited.--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
372:Institute of Strategic Studies
267:) is a sister publication of
1:
248:doesn't seem to be notable.--
347:She has 1400 G-hits on the
455:
421:04:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
403:19:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
391:16:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
363:14:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
340:14:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
324:08:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
304:07:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
292:05:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
276:05:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
253:05:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
241:02:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
220:00:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
193:21:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
184:I don't think this passes
174:14:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
146:19:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
126:18:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
53:17:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
431:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
262:this Frontline article
311:per outside sourcing
370:Director General of
162:User:221.132.113.214
160:--Comment added by
123:Jefferson Anderson
320:
222:
176:
172:
140:
67:Shireen M. Mazari
59:Shireen M. Mazari
46:No consensus keep
446:
433:
359:
321:
319:
218:
205:
202:
168:
158:
131:
108:
90:
34:
454:
453:
449:
448:
447:
445:
444:
443:
442:
436:deletion review
429:
377:. Reports like
357:
318:
264:. Frontline (
258:Tentative Keep.
207:
200:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
452:
450:
441:
440:
424:
423:
406:
405:
393:
365:
342:
326:
306:
294:
278:
255:
243:
224:
223:
204:
196:
195:
179:
178:
177:
149:
148:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
451:
439:
437:
432:
426:
425:
422:
419:
416:in Pakistan.
415:
411:
408:
407:
404:
401:
397:
394:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
369:
366:
364:
361:
360:
353:
350:
346:
343:
341:
338:
334:
330:
327:
325:
322:
316:
315:
310:
307:
305:
302:
298:
295:
293:
290:
286:
282:
279:
277:
274:
270:
266:
263:
259:
256:
254:
251:
247:
244:
242:
239:
238:
233:
229:
226:
225:
221:
217:
216:
212:
211:
203:
198:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
180:
175:
171:
167:
164:
163:
157:
156:
154:
153:DO NOT DELETE
151:
150:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
430:
427:
410:DON'T DELETE
409:
395:
367:
356:
348:
344:
328:
314:the_undertow
313:
308:
301:Lemonsawdust
296:
280:
257:
245:
235:
227:
214:
209:
199:
181:
159:
152:
132:
118:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
329:Weak delete
414:think tank
358:RGTraynor
383:Dwaipayan
349:Pakistani
309:weak keep
269:The Hindu
250:Sefringle
190:Pete.Hurd
143:Pete.Hurd
111:View log
50:Marskell
418:Razzsic
396:Neutral
351:Google
333:WP:PROF
273:Stammer
186:WP:PROF
84:protect
79:history
400:Jmlk17
337:Edison
297:Delete
246:delete
228:Delete
215:scribe
182:delete
119:Delete
88:delete
345:Keep:
285:Kirby
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
387:talk
379:this
368:Keep
289:time
281:keep
170:Talk
166:ST47
133:Note
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
237:DGG
210:WjB
141:--
139:.
109:– (
389:)
271:.
121:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
385:(
287:♥
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.