229:; the article isn't even about Sideshow Cinema, rather it's an article showcasing amateur (unpaid) actors who don't qualify for articles on the own. Many have been deleted only to be recreated here. This is much like having an article on a random Restaurant in the form of mini-bios on the entire staff. In addition, the assertion that anything having to do with this is "award-winning" is a bit misleading. We're talking B-movie awards of very limited notability here, not the Oscars. If any of the "actors" listed do warrant articles of their own that's a different issue. Most do not. -
171:
The
Sideshow Cinema entry contains a list of Michael Legge's stable of actors. This list includes award winning actors and actors who have appeared in award winning films. They are notable in the independent movie making world of which I am a fan. The article gives a good thumbnail bio on the actors.
187:
If individual actors are notable then by all mean they should have their own articles. If
Sideshow Cinema is notable then it should have a real article that demonstrates it's notability. The Allegan Community players article should probably be deleted to and in any case the presence of worse
305:
whether or not an encyclopaedic article on this subject can be written is a matter for debate, but this is not it, and this contains little if anything that would contribute towards that. It seems at present to be largely comprised of actor bios for people who completely fail
202:
but the article needs to be expanded to be more than just a list of actors. This is a notable group, and a number of the individuals listed (such as Debbie Rochon) are notable enough to warrant their own articles, which would serve to shorten the actor list section a bit.
265:. Keep the article, but delete everything except the introduction and the sources. Note some of the most prominent members of the "stable of actors" in one sentence. In fact, I will do so right now; please revert me if my change goes too far. --
288:
stands regardless of whether the actor-specific information is retained or removed. If that information is to be kept (to which I'm not necessarily opposed), I think the main issue is to improve the manner in which it is presented. --
274:
I have performed the edit. The sourced information of the previous version is still present in the edit history and, if this AFD closes as 'no consensus' or 'keep', I intend to merge some of it into relevant biographical articles. --
214:
The problem is this article has been sitting for a year without anyone adding any source. Instead of just saying it is notable some one should put up some references and I can withdraw the nomination.
250:
The problem is not that this article is not sourced but that the sources have little reference to the actual subject of the article. The sources are generally about the actors in the list. --
121:
176:
which gives no background information on any of the actors and is just a list of names of actors who played in community theater. This article is much better.
310:, and in some cases at least is being used as an end-run around deletion policy by including content which has been deleted when added as separate articles.
94:
89:
98:
323:
293:
279:
269:
254:
233:
219:
207:
192:
180:
159:
150:
135:
63:
81:
17:
131:
Seeing as this went up for deletion a year ago (no consensus) and hasn't improved much I figured I would nominate it again. --
338:
36:
337:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
173:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
155:
Since this is compromise is not acceptable to some editors. I guess I will have to withdraw my withdrawal. --
251:
216:
189:
156:
147:
132:
85:
177:
290:
276:
266:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
77:
69:
242:
318:
312:
307:
230:
204:
50:
115:
331:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
146:
Without the long list of actors we have a reasonable article. --
241:
as this is not a suitable subject for an encyclopedia.
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
129:Appears to be a list of mostly non notable actors.
341:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
284:Just to clarify, my recommendation to
7:
188:articles is not a reason to keep. --
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
172:I will point out this entry
358:
324:10:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
294:00:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
280:21:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
270:20:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
255:15:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
234:18:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
220:15:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
208:15:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
193:14:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
181:13:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
160:00:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
151:21:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
136:06:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
64:16:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
174:Allegan Community Players
334:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
143:Nomination withdrawn.
322:
252:Daniel J. Leivick
217:Daniel J. Leivick
190:Daniel J. Leivick
157:Daniel J. Leivick
148:Daniel J. Leivick
133:Daniel J. Leivick
349:
336:
316:
119:
101:
60:
53:
34:
357:
356:
352:
351:
350:
348:
347:
346:
345:
339:deletion review
332:
262:with suggestion
92:
78:Sideshow Cinema
76:
73:
70:Sideshow Cinema
62:
58:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
355:
353:
344:
343:
327:
326:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
257:
245:
236:
223:
222:
211:
210:
196:
195:
184:
183:
165:
164:
163:
162:
126:
125:
72:
67:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
354:
342:
340:
335:
329:
328:
325:
320:
315:
314:
309:
304:
301:
295:
292:
287:
283:
282:
281:
278:
273:
272:
271:
268:
264:
263:
258:
256:
253:
249:
246:
244:
240:
237:
235:
232:
228:
225:
224:
221:
218:
213:
212:
209:
206:
201:
198:
197:
194:
191:
186:
185:
182:
179:
175:
170:
167:
166:
161:
158:
154:
153:
152:
149:
145:
144:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
130:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
333:
330:
311:
302:
291:Black Falcon
285:
277:Black Falcon
267:Black Falcon
261:
259:
247:
238:
226:
199:
168:
142:
141:
128:
127:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
243:Mr. Berry
231:R. fiend
205:23skidoo
122:View log
59:(o rly?)
248:Comment
95:protect
90:history
52:Majorly
308:WP:BIO
303:Delete
239:Delete
227:Delete
99:delete
319:Help!
260:Keep
178:Plank
169:Keep:
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
286:keep
200:Keep
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
313:Guy
120:– (
215:--
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
321:)
317:(
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.