Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Simplex algorithm method - Knowledge

Source 📝

137:, which gives a very good general explanation on the problem, including it's mathematical formulation. Therefore it is obvious that a second article, which the original author claims that was copied from a textbook, isn't justified. Moreover, Knowledge isn't a howto manual. There are other wiki projects which are better suited for this kind of information -- 179:
So why not expand and improve the already existing article? And if the reader really wants a HowTo document, why not consult other wiki-projects like wikibooks? As I see it, two separate articles is overkill for such a simple thing, specially if one of them is a HowTo manual (which doesn't belong in
297:
approach the simplex algorithm twice. First the book explains the hands-on approach to the algorithm (to what the AfD serves as a howto) and then the book presents the algebraic approach (what is written in the article). I believe that the article would indeed benefit from having both approaches
236:, Prentice-Hall, 1959 (a fine book which unfortunately seems to be hard to obtain these days). (I could give more authoritative citations testifying to the outstanding importance of this algorithm, even specifically to the algorithm itself, but I trust that one will suffice.)--- 341:
plays a prominent role in the history of the 20th century. The fact that this is not a how-to manual does not mean that at least some of its material should be "how-to" stuff, especially with such a prominent topic as this one.
161:
explains the details of the algorithm well. It only gives an overview of the algorithm, and I think that somebody who hasn't seen it before will find it impossible to follow the explanation. --
52: 228:
undergraduate textbook on numerical methods which I have seen (and I have looked at dozens) contains a similar discussion. To name one of the most elementary such books:
114:. Don't tell me we don't have other articles that in effect step through algorithms. Can we not explain anything, for example arithmetic, defined in this way? 49: 204:
per Charles Matthews. Algorithms are frequently difficult to understand; this seems appropriate. Could use a better title, though.
216:. Maybe the article was greatly improved after the nomination? At any event, I don't see the problem. The simplex algorithm is 17: 346: 329: 306: 281: 265: 240: 208: 188: 170: 145: 118: 106: 86: 72: 64:
Violates Knowledge's 1st Pillar. Knowledge isn't a howto manual or a medium to hold indiscriminate types of information
361: 36: 220:, and has had a tremendous influence on the development of math/sci/engineering since it was introduced. It is 360:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
261: 58: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
273:
per ColourBurst. This is an encyclopedia, not a textbook. Nevertheless, the existence of this implies that
166: 326: 115: 252:. I don't see the point of having an example of using the simplex algorithm anywhere other than the 303: 294: 257: 185: 142: 69: 343: 338: 274: 253: 249: 162: 158: 134: 99: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
323: 83: 278: 299: 181: 138: 65: 130: 237: 229: 218:
without doubt one of the most important algorithms in all of applied mathematics
103: 205: 277:
could probably use an example, with explicitly subscripted coordinates.
354:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
224:
to offer a clear step by step discussion. Please note that
337:
This is not "indiscriminate information". Obviously the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 364:). No further edits should be made to this page. 102:. A solid article, but in the wrong place. -- 8: 133:. There is already an article on the 7: 293:I agree. Usually the textbooks on 24: 180:wikipedia) copied from a book. -- 78:Sounds like a good candidate for 298:listed, which merits a merge. -- 131:Knowledge is not a HowTo manual 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 234:Finite Mathematical Structures 50:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 1: 94:to Wikiversity or wikibooks, 53:00:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 347:22:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 330:22:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 307:23:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 282:20:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 266:19:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 241:18:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 209:23:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 189:11:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 171:01:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 146:17:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 119:16:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 107:15:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 87:15:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 73:10:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 381: 357:Please do not modify it. 59:Simplex algorithm method 32:Please do not modify it. 222:completely appropriate 80:transwiki to wikibooks 295:operations research 339:simplex algorithm 275:simplex algorithm 254:simplex algorithm 250:simplex algorithm 159:simplex algorithm 135:simplex algorithm 100:Simplex algorithm 372: 359: 157:. I don't think 116:Charles Matthews 34: 380: 379: 375: 374: 373: 371: 370: 369: 368: 362:deletion review 355: 279:Septentrionalis 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 378: 376: 367: 366: 350: 349: 332: 312: 311: 310: 309: 285: 284: 268: 258:Meni Rosenfeld 243: 211: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 174: 173: 149: 148: 122: 121: 109: 89: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 377: 365: 363: 358: 352: 351: 348: 345: 344:Michael Hardy 340: 336: 335:Keep or merge 333: 331: 328: 325: 321: 317: 314: 313: 308: 305: 301: 296: 292: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 280: 276: 272: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 244: 242: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 210: 207: 203: 200: 199: 190: 187: 183: 178: 177: 176: 175: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 144: 140: 136: 132: 129: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 117: 113: 110: 108: 105: 101: 97: 93: 90: 88: 85: 81: 77: 76: 75: 74: 71: 67: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 48:(or merge). 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 356: 353: 334: 319: 315: 290: 270: 256:article. -- 245: 233: 225: 221: 217: 213: 201: 163:Jitse Niesen 154: 127: 111: 95: 91: 79: 63: 45: 43: 31: 28: 324:Paul August 84:ColourBurst 300:Mecanismo 271:transwiki 182:Mecanismo 139:Mecanismo 92:Transwiki 66:Mecanismo 232:et al., 96:redirect 291:Comment 155:Comment 128:Comment 230:Kemeny 104:Wafulz 320:Merge 248:into 246:Merge 226:every 206:linas 16:< 316:Keep 304:Talk 262:talk 214:Keep 202:Keep 186:Talk 167:talk 143:Talk 112:Keep 70:Talk 46:keep 318:or 98:to 82:. 322:. 302:| 264:) 238:CH 184:| 169:) 141:| 68:| 327:☎ 260:( 165:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Can't sleep, clown will eat me
00:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Simplex algorithm method
Mecanismo
Talk
10:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
ColourBurst
15:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Simplex algorithm
Wafulz
15:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Charles Matthews
16:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Knowledge is not a HowTo manual
simplex algorithm
Mecanismo
Talk
17:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
simplex algorithm
Jitse Niesen
talk
01:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Mecanismo
Talk
11:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
linas
23:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Kemeny

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.