416:
go back over 75 years of history). It should not matter if
Aeroflot is noted for its service quality or not, but a list of awards should be appropriate if it is for SIA. The mere fact that you bring up this point is evidence that there is a high POV in that article, or at the very least, behind the article, for if you were of the belief that such a list is required for SIA, then you should also be of the belief it is required for every other airline out there which has received some award, no matter how obscure that award may be. It also seems a tad strange that it is necessary to have a huge list of received awards which have been ripped directly from the SIA website, then at the bottom of the article is a link to the complete list on the SIA website. Why not write a brief synopsis within the main
399:, outright deletion of the entire article is not the only solution to resolve a small factual error. If you are going to attempt a list of all awards won by Aeroflot, please consider if Aeroflot itself is a notable airline in terms of service quality, and a trendsetter in the global aviation industry. Listing all awards won by Aeroflot is perhaps of little encyclopedic value, but when Singapore Airlines claims to be the most awarded airline in the world, there is a far higher likelihood for users to question the validity of this statement, and to consider the range of awards won. Avoid assuming that just because XXX Airline has an awards page, all other airlines must have one too. Ultimately, notability is still key.--
378:. Allowing the article as it is to stand will only cause confusion amongst users who are using this site for it's encyclopaedic content, as they will only be met with nothing more than an advertisement. And where does it stop? I could easily make a list of hundreds of awards which Aeroflot has had bestowed on it going back to 1932. Does such a list honestly make much different to encyclopaedic value, particularly when a brief summary can be placed in the main article, along with a
395:
consideration for the topic's notability seems a tad insulting to mature contributors, myself included. I agree that the two awards you mention are probably insignificant in the global arena, but a quick look at the list, and in comprison to the official site, shows that the list actually includes all awards received. The opening sentence which once appeared in the main article for a partial list was not updated when it was moved to the expanded list in a new page. As in
449:. Please inform if any of those statements with regards to SIA are not supported by third-party publications. Please advise if there are third-party publications stating that Aeroflot blazes the trail in terms of service quality for the global aviation scene, and is well-respected the world over as a company. If so, you are most welcome to add these info to the
453:
page. I find it curious to observe that you appear to be demanding that sourced, verified, positive comments about certain airlines be removed by flagging them as "POV", just so that they all read and sound similar to airlines which are far less accredited for their service quality standards. If this
415:
is also quite insulting. But I do think that you have proven my point with what you have written above. Particularly your comment about whether
Aeroflot (used for this argument) is 'notable' for service quality, or a trendsetter in the global aviation industry (which it is if you get rid of POV and
228:
If the idea to keep the main article succint by moving content to secondary pages ends up with the later getting deleted, then we are back to square one. I appears to me that you arent too familiar with the overall setup of some aviation-related articles, and the history behind some of their
308:
as it is conter-productive to delete it as it has been made to serve a purpose and will cause more problems in the future. But it should be changed a bit, maybe a blurb summarizing it's service and quality at the start and then a list of only the 'notable' awards given in the last few years
394:
There is perhaps a rather blurred distinction between "fanboy" topics and topics which commands singificant interest amongst professionals, academics, and the general public, thus fueling extensive writeups about them. But to trivalise efforts of wikipedians as merely "fanboy" without due
454:
is your hidden agenda, then I would think the deletion of this article is itself setting a bad precedent amongst users attempting to use wikipedia's NPOV policy as an excuse to censor out positive (and potentially negative) opinions, depite these opinions being verified and sourced.--
288:. Note also that it is common for a major topic to be covered by several articles with notability inherited from the main article. This avoids unnecessary cycle of splitting and merging. This is generally acceptable as long as the sub-topic is non-trivial, e.g.
444:
only three months prior?) Now if it was due to POV over whether
Aeroflot is more notable than SIA in terms of service quality to the point of actually considering my statements to be POV, then I am simply going to fall back on a fundamental police:
366:, the room would be scratching their heads wondering just who this organisation is, and what makes their award so significant. I know I would be, and I can guarantee so would the CEO of SQ. The list as given is a verbatim copy from this
476:, main article is lengthy enough. A longer paragraph should be written, maybe summarising some of the major awards. Listing the notable awards as what Tom said would be better and this will not be mistaken as a directory.
433:
396:
321:
This is indeed a very workable idea. There is scope for some content to be added to a simple listing of awards. This should help set the context for otherwise clueless users who think this is merely a standalone
263:
as an alternative but what happens if that information is removed from the site? Maybe we need a discussion somewhere about lists of awards for corporations and how much of this type of information is needed.
441:
87:
82:
91:
74:
432:
So what is your primary motivation here: Pushing for deletion because you were personally insulted, or because of POV issues, or both? (and speaking of that, kindly inform if
114:
289:
362:
are listed in this article, which in the opening states these are significant awards. If you were to go to a travel industry quiz night and a question related to the
285:
497:
177:, where it was first added as part of the "service quality" section to demonstrate its reputation in the industry and to the travelling public.--
370:. Expanding the article to try and put some context in it is pointless, as any information which could be included in the article should, or
281:
531:
503:
493:
480:
458:
424:
403:
386:
326:
313:
296:
268:
251:
233:
218:
181:
165:
149:
128:
56:
354:, SQ does have a sizeable fanboy following. I posted on the main article talk page the fact that two awards which are mentioned , namely
17:
78:
214:
70:
62:
546:
36:
527:
495:
437:
420:
article, and provide the link to the SIA website as a reference point. To keep would be setting a bad precedent. --
379:
367:
196:
545:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
516:
is already too long to be merged back in. This article could do with a cleanup of references and so forth. --
202:
521:
162:
280:
is recognized as top in its field, its list of awards is itself notable. Similar articles include
513:
417:
375:
277:
210:
192:
174:
158:
142:
122:
49:
517:
351:
121:
Awards which a company receives are not notable. A summary awards should be incorporated into
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
265:
138:
347:
446:
489:
421:
383:
310:
260:
206:
146:
125:
53:
500:
477:
455:
400:
323:
305:
230:
178:
499:
in the past few hours, all based on nothing but self-perceived "non-notability".--
108:
293:
397:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Singapore
Airlines Cargo destinations
246:
450:
259:. The main article already has too much information. I might agree with
343:
195:
article with a summarisation of awards, and a link provided to their
539:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
191:
This article should really be incorporated in the main
104:
100:
96:
436:
is not a result of cluelessness of the existance of
290:
Template:Lists of US Presidents and Vice
Presidents
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
48:. If you have any questions, please contact me at
492:has nominated another three SIA-related articles
549:). No further edits should be made to this page.
276:as part of series covering a major topic. As
8:
286:List of awards and achievements for Madonna
145:summarizing awards should be sufficient. --
382:(from which came all the info anyway)? --
245:The above logic by Huaiwei is correct.
71:Singapore Airlines awards and accolades
63:Singapore Airlines awards and accolades
364:Scottish Passenger Agents Association
356:Scottish Passenger Agents Association
282:Career achievements of Michael Jordan
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
199:for a full rundown of their awards.
173:. This article was split off from
24:
342:of articles, they come across as
304:We should follow the comments by
1:
157:per above and copy the EL to
566:
532:11:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
504:07:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
481:17:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
459:06:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
425:02:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
404:06:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
387:06:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
327:06:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
314:06:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
297:02:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
269:00:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
252:23:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
234:22:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
219:18:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
182:17:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
166:14:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
150:13:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
129:10:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
57:13:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
542:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
374:already, be covered at
334:Having a look at the
205:comment was added by
438:all similar articles
411:And to call people
338:Singapore Airlines
376:Singapore Airlines
278:Singapore Airlines
175:Singapore Airlines
159:Singapore Airlines
143:Singapore Airlines
123:Singapore Airlines
526:
512:per Huaiwei, the
360:Korea Herald, The
352:Malaysia Airlines
222:
557:
544:
524:
413:"clueless users"
249:
200:
112:
94:
34:
565:
564:
560:
559:
558:
556:
555:
554:
553:
547:deletion review
540:
440:, as well as a
434:this nomination
247:
201:—The preceding
141:. A section in
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
563:
561:
552:
551:
535:
534:
484:
483:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
348:Cathay Pacific
322:"directory".--
299:
271:
254:
239:
238:
237:
236:
185:
184:
168:
152:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
562:
550:
548:
543:
537:
536:
533:
529:
523:
519:
515:
511:
508:
507:
506:
505:
502:
498:
496:
494:
491:
488:
482:
479:
475:
472:
460:
457:
452:
448:
443:
439:
435:
431:
428:
427:
426:
423:
419:
414:
410:
407:
406:
405:
402:
398:
393:
390:
389:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:. Along with
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
329:
328:
325:
320:
317:
316:
315:
312:
307:
303:
300:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
267:
262:
258:
255:
253:
250:
244:
241:
240:
235:
232:
227:
224:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
198:
194:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
169:
167:
164:
160:
156:
153:
151:
148:
144:
140:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
127:
124:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
541:
538:
514:main article
509:
486:
485:
473:
442:previous AFD
429:
412:
408:
391:
371:
363:
359:
355:
339:
335:
331:
318:
301:
273:
256:
242:
229:existance.--
225:
188:
170:
154:
139:WP:NOT#IINFO
134:
120:
50:my talk page
45:
43:
31:
28:
510:Strong Keep
302:Strong Keep
266:Vegaswikian
243:Strong Keep
163:YechielMan
344:fanboyish
137:per nom;
54:Ian Manka
528:contribs
490:Russavia
451:Aeroflot
422:Russavia
384:Russavia
261:Russavia
215:contribs
207:Russavia
203:unsigned
147:Muchness
126:Russavia
115:View log
501:Huaiwei
487:Comment
478:Terence
456:Huaiwei
430:Comment
409:Comment
401:Huaiwei
392:Comment
332:Comment
324:Huaiwei
319:Comment
306:Huaiwei
231:Huaiwei
226:Comment
197:website
189:Comment
179:Huaiwei
88:protect
83:history
340:series
336:entire
155:Delete
135:Delete
92:delete
518:Arnzy
372:would
294:Vsion
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
522:talk
474:Keep
447:WP:V
380:link
368:link
358:and
350:and
292:. --
274:Keep
257:Keep
248:VK35
211:talk
171:Keep
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
418:SIA
311:Tom
113:– (
530:)
284:,
217:)
213:•
193:SQ
161:.
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
52:.
525:•
520:(
221:.
209:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.