407:
source is not enough. Open to re-evaluating should someone come up with better sources off-line someday - the album was released in the mid-90s, before online sources were prevalent, and judging by some the type of coverage he receives in later albums, they may exist out there somewhere. (Though,
177:
314:, that is news to me, and it's somewhat surprising given Blabbermouth's lack of editorial oversight and their tendency to (re)publish everything they run into, including press releases. There is a claim of reliability in their article, sourced to the
103:
98:
107:
90:
245:
Blabbermouth is a reliable source for reviews but not for news so in this case as it is a news item it is unreliable but not in every case. Reserving judgement on notability incase offline or non google sources are
171:
208:
totally non-notable album that does not meet the requirements of NALBUM: there are no professional reviews, nor is there any discussion of the album in reliable sources. the best of the internet is this link,
352:
deemed reliable in a general sense. I've used the website heavily these last 5-7 years in writing articles and saving articles at AFD, and I don't recall ever running into any opposition over it.
264:
137:
344:
In this particular situation, I do agree with you - that
Blabbermouth source is rather short - not exactly siginificant coverage about the article subject. But in a general sense,
130:
376:
192:
223:'s revert is not very useful either: he clearly didn't see that there is no proper sourcing for the article, which is simply not notable by Knowledge (XXG) standards.
159:
512:
488:
455:
423:
388:
363:
339:
301:
276:
255:
232:
72:
153:
326:. So I don't believe that Blabbermouth is that reliable, but more importantly I don't believe that it's that important. One review on Blabbermouth, one
149:
412:, so who knows.) Very little can be sourced now, so its best to redirect for now, and spinout if/when sourcing is provided and prose is written.
242:
199:
94:
66:
165:
86:
78:
219:, who said he added references--but that's to Roth's own website and to Blabbermouth, which is just a zine and not a reliable source.
17:
497:
464:
531:
40:
287:
272:
61:
241:
If a bold redirect is reverted it should go to AFD or at least be discussed on the talk page. According to
481:
418:
358:
296:
527:
508:
251:
36:
409:
335:
228:
436:
268:
185:
56:
53:
476:
413:
384:
353:
311:
291:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
526:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
404:
247:
220:
400:
212:, and that is just another webzine. I had redirected the article but it was restored here,
431:- just what Sergecross said. It's 1996, sorta pre-internet era. I can dig out mid-90s old
331:
323:
224:
330:
review on a website that seems to lack editorial oversight, isn't enough for notability.
283:
451:
443:
380:
286:. It's usable for news too, the consensus is just to be cautious on BLP stuff. See
124:
447:
216:
210:
439:
442:
at the time did not cover much of
European hard rock scene but I'm sure
432:
435:
myself. He is at least interviewed and covered in Feb 1996 issue
410:
even
Allmusic doesn't cover this release, despite covering others
520:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
500:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
467:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
322:
in 2009, but that supposed article is nowhere to be found--
319:
213:
120:
116:
112:
399:- I couldn't find enough reliable sources to meet the
184:
265:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
506:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
473:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
198:
87:Sky of Avalon – Prologue to the Symphonic Legends
79:Sky of Avalon – Prologue to the Symphonic Legends
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
534:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
377:list of Germany-related deletion discussions
375:Note: This debate has been included in the
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
446:probably did record review of some sort. --
374:
262:
243:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Albums/Sources
282:Blabbermouth is generally considered an
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
551:
523:Please do not modify it.
513:02:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
489:21:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
456:04:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
348:be rather shocked if it
73:04:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
424:15:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
389:00:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
364:22:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
340:20:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
302:15:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
277:15:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
256:15:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
233:15:18, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
515:
491:
391:
316:London Free Press
312:User:Sergecross73
279:
542:
525:
511:
505:
503:
501:
486:
484:
479:
472:
470:
468:
421:
416:
405:Blabbermouth.net
361:
356:
299:
294:
288:WP:MUSIC/SOURCES
221:User:Atlantic306
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
550:
549:
545:
544:
543:
541:
540:
539:
538:
532:deletion review
521:
516:
507:
496:
494:
492:
482:
477:
475:
463:
461:
419:
414:
403:- a very short
359:
354:
297:
292:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
548:
546:
537:
536:
504:
493:
471:
460:
459:
458:
433:Burrn magazine
426:
393:
392:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
328:user-submitted
305:
304:
269:NewYorkActuary
259:
258:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
547:
535:
533:
529:
524:
518:
517:
514:
510:
509:North America
502:
499:
490:
487:
485:
480:
469:
466:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
430:
427:
425:
422:
417:
411:
406:
402:
398:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
373:
365:
362:
357:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
300:
295:
289:
285:
281:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
244:
240:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
522:
519:
495:
478:CAPTAIN RAJU
474:
462:
444:Metal Hammer
428:
415:Sergecross73
408:then again,
396:
355:Sergecross73
349:
345:
327:
315:
293:Sergecross73
238:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
248:Atlantic306
172:free images
332:Mindy Dirt
320:introduced
225:Mindy Dirt
528:talk page
381:• Gene93k
318:--it was
217:User:Yk49
37:talk page
530:or in a
498:Relisted
465:Relisted
440:Kerrang!
397:Redirect
131:View log
39:or in a
239:Comment
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
420:msg me
401:WP:GNG
360:msg me
350:wasn't
298:msg me
246:found.
150:Google
108:delete
284:WP:RS
215:, by
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
452:talk
448:Yk49
429:Keep
385:talk
336:talk
324:look
273:talk
252:talk
229:talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
483:(✉)
346:I'd
200:TWL
129:– (
52:.
454:)
438:.
387:)
379:.
338:)
290:.
275:)
267:.
254:)
231:)
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
450:(
383:(
334:(
310:(
271:(
250:(
227:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.