138:
Don't you need to at least pretend to cite a reason for removing a prod notice, not "tweaking definition"? I believe that the prod could've been restored as it was removed out of process. But as that is neither here nore there any longer, I support deletion for the reason cited in the prod
128:. My additional concern about this term is that of the 7 Google hits on this spelling, none appear to easily conform to "Philadelphia usage". As such, I believe the term is either non-notable or unverifiable, or perhaps this a hoax article.
117:
150:
Given the speed with which the notice was removed, and the fact that it wasn't accompanied by obvious vandalism, I chose to follow the spirit of
17:
239:
90:
85:
94:
262:
36:
77:
261:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
244:
222:
202:
181:
158:
145:
132:
81:
59:
177:
54:
124:
The article was proposed for deletion on the grounds that it was a neologism, per section 2 of
73:
65:
218:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
151:
211:
190:
169:
125:
173:
50:
231:
155:
129:
214:
194:
141:
111:
154:
and assume the removal was for a reason, albeit not yet stated. --
255:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
265:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
193:does not meet notability requirements. -
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
230:Non notable, unsourced, neologism --
168:Non-notable, unsourced violation of
24:
152:Knowledge (XXG):PROD#Conflicts
1:
245:10:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
223:08:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
203:04:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
182:01:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
159:08:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
146:00:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
133:23:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
60:01:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
282:
258:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
210:as nn neologism per
273:
260:
115:
97:
58:
34:
281:
280:
276:
275:
274:
272:
271:
270:
269:
263:deletion review
256:
242:
88:
72:
69:
49:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
279:
277:
268:
267:
250:
248:
247:
238:
225:
205:
184:
163:
162:
161:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
278:
266:
264:
259:
253:
252:
251:
246:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
224:
220:
216:
213:
209:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
160:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
144:
143:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
56:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
257:
254:
249:
235:
227:
207:
186:
165:
140:
139:nomination.
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
174:Earthdirt
74:Ski-Whoop
66:Ski-Whoop
51:Nishkid64
232:Nate1481
118:View log
215:Mayalld
195:Headwes
189:. This
142:seresin
91:protect
86:history
228:Delete
212:WP:NEO
208:Delete
191:WP:NEO
187:Delete
170:WP:NEO
166:Delete
126:WP:NEO
95:delete
46:delete
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
219:talk
199:talk
178:talk
156:Kife
130:Kife
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
55:talk
116:– (
243:)
221:)
201:)
180:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
48:.
240:c
236:/
234:(
217:(
197:(
176:(
172:.
120:)
114:)
76:(
57:)
53:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.