202:, which says "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable". This song does not pass any of this criteria. The vast majority of the sources here do not refer to the song in its own right, but are retracted from reviews of
575:, but just to point out that by comparison, "Speechless" has a wealth of information about it, particularly citation 4, which is entirely about the song. Granted, the majority of the other references provide just passing mentions (not even 1 sentence in some instances; as many as 3 sentences in a few instances). My bottom line is, as
571:, survived despite the most significant "coverage" being an About.com posting that pretty much consists solely of an image. I realize that the song charted, but charted songs are only "probably notable", not "definitely notable" enough to warrant an article, especially if there's virtually zero coverage. My point is not to violate
970:
The song has been performed on a major awards show, charted on several charts and is to be a future single. Gaga has also heavily promoted it in many interviews. Regardless of this, the article has more information than many singles articles do, which is a hard thing to do, and so it should be kept.
1019:
This article and the songs are not notable, they are notable just for Gaga's fans (above), who, in fact, created this article only cause they "love Lady Gaga". All this guys are saying that is notable enough, but, not even in Google is notable, is just notable for Gaga's people, sorry, but it has to
914:
Since the nomination of this article, the song in question has charted the BillBoard Hot 100. Would have voted a weaker keep initially even before the release of the 12 December 09 charts as a frequency mentioned single of a mainstream artist, but it's apperance that list unquestionably causes this
532:
I'm not going to go too crazy defending this article, but out of curiousity, what elements of the general notability guideline do you feel are not satisfied? The five main criteria are 1) significant coverage, 2) reliable, 3) sources, 4) independent of the subject and 5) presumed. To me, it seems
397:
mean it doesn't warrant an article. The very next sentence in WP:NSONGS after that one is, "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be
1024:, so, it doesn't matter if "If every Pink Floyd song can get an article" like someone said before, not every song has to have an article about it, no matter if some of those articles say "X released Y as their 2nd single from the album Z", we don't need any more crap. Sorry, got to be deleted.
1001:
I feel as though the wealth of knowledge surrounding this song more than makes it worthy of having its own article. Also, there are many articles for singles on this website that have absolutely no content in them, aside from "X released Y as their 2nd single from the album Z."
241:
per nominator. The song hasn't charted and most of the references are in relation to the parent article, showing no individual notability. As an observer of the Lady Gaga articles for some time, it does seem that articles appear to crop up regularly that often get deleted.
579:
states, "a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." Indeed, I would consider this article to be reasonably detailed, and so I'm in favor of keeping this. As for those songs on
398:
merged to articles about an artist or album." Obviously, in this case, there is plenty of verifiable material to warrant an entry, and the article is already reasonably detailed. WP:NSONGS also points out that the song must meet basic
672:
These article defenately passes, it have more information than most articles of number-one hits. And don't worry about the song not charting in any country, the digital sales last week guarantee that it will debut tomorrow on the
163:
258:
344:
You're the main contributor of said article. Your continual arguments are becoming distruptive and pedantic - please make your points in one !vote and refrain from continual distruption.
157:
124:
511:
per nom. All of the sources provided absolutely establish the notability of Lady Gaga and The Fame
Monster, however notability of this individual song has not been established.
454:
220:
The song has been performed a number of times. The critical notability of this song and the fact that it has received widespread media coverage is what makes it notable.
457:) are left article-less. The same can be said for MANY unreleased songs by The Beatles, The Rolling Stones and other acts who have whole books written on single albums.
450:
97:
92:
101:
84:
1070:" as well, because it never charted since it wasn't released as a single. Surliness of votes like the one above not doing nomination much help, either.
867:
828:. This obviously passes the general notability guideline, and the charts that have just been released even further make this article pass NSONGS.
475:
argument. But personally, I'd rather see those articles get made (with the appropriate reliable secondary sources) than this one get deleted. —
178:
145:
410:
of the subject. This article also meets those standards: significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. —
472:
17:
548:
490:
425:
139:
88:
1045:
states: "While these comparisons are not a conclusive test, they may form part of a cogent argument". Such is the case here.--
835:
568:
286:
52:. There's no way that consensus is going to change from keep. It has charted as of three days ago, a day after the nomination.
1102:
1079:
1054:
1033:
1011:
991:
962:
945:
927:
906:
887:
870:
838:
820:
802:
781:
758:
725:
705:
686:
662:
646:
633:
596:
557:
527:
499:
466:
434:
373:
353:
339:
323:
300:
275:
248:
231:
215:
135:
66:
449:
has recieved the same coverage (it being probably the most critically acclaimed album ever) but still The Lady in My Life (
752:
987:
61:
1117:
185:
36:
80:
72:
328:
Accompanying "Bad
Romance" performances? "Speechless" was the primary performances in AMAs and Ellen. Weird point.
407:
1029:
766:
per Hunter Kahn. Not only is there a stunning amount of sources to prove the article is verifiable and meets the
1116:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
746:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
915:
article to fall in the Keep category. Satisfies all requirements for coverage and notability, and then some.
151:
779:
53:
975:
1097:
1066:. Notability clearly established. By nominator's strict application of criteria, we would have to delete "
1042:
1021:
1007:
572:
442:
362:. I can argue and make points as long as I want. You cannot possibly stop me from making logical points.
1075:
723:
701:
660:
631:
540:
482:
462:
417:
371:
349:
337:
298:
229:
211:
206:
album, leaving the song as notable as any other song on the album and not deserving of its own article.
878:
It has charted in even multiple countries. Two is more than one. But one could probably be sufficient.—
403:
1050:
1025:
958:
860:
523:
1003:
693:
830:
171:
1088:
771:
576:
386:
199:
1067:
979:
775:
682:
644:
319:
847:
790:
607:
1092:
883:
816:
615:
584:
that don't have articles...if enough information exists, I'm all for their creation, as well.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
1071:
983:
798:
741:
Pink Floyd song can get an article, then "Speechless" deserves one too. It surely meets the
715:
697:
652:
623:
535:
477:
458:
446:
412:
363:
345:
329:
290:
244:
221:
207:
203:
1020:
be deleted. BTW, a lot of the guys here, that try to keep the article are forgetting about
767:
742:
359:
282:
1046:
954:
941:
916:
852:
512:
651:
The nom's deletion has been contested. So please explain your disapproval more detailed.
902:
270:
811:
611:
399:
678:
587:
315:
393:
notable". In other words, just because it doesn't fit any of those criteria doesn't
879:
622:. Wait for Billboard to update their website. do you need any other notability? :D
118:
794:
311:
774:
as probably notable. Taken together, there should be no doubt about keeping. -
937:
897:
266:
310:- no proof of independent notability outside of the album and accompanying
895:, eminently satisfies significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.
711:
619:
710:
In that case its a fail again as the song has already charted on the
850:
as it has received widespread media coverage throughout the world.
1110:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
694:
Knowledge (XXG) does not guess what will happen in the future
614:, the song has already charted at sixty on Billboard's
114:
110:
106:
170:
259:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
281:The song has charted now. Not to be going on about
184:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1120:). No further edits should be made to this page.
936:Charted song, perfomed on tv and good article.--
1091:: has charted, and has significant coverage.
8:
445:for a moment; surely almost every song on
253:
618:chart and entered at ninety-four on the
257:: This debate has been included in the
810:as per Hunter Kahn's rationale, passes
285:, but if this one is deleted, so would
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
567:. Another recent Lady Gaga AfD nom,
24:
569:Christmas Tree (Lady Gaga song)
287:Christmas Tree (Lady Gaga song)
1:
471:Well, as you said, that's an
1103:18:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1080:17:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1055:22:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
1034:22:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
1012:15:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
992:05:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
963:01:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
946:22:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
928:20:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
907:05:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
888:05:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
871:21:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
839:21:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
821:19:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
803:17:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
782:13:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
770:, by charting it also meets
759:13:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
743:general notability guideline
726:12:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
706:11:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
687:04:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
663:06:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
647:03:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
634:03:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
597:03:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
558:02:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
533:they are all satisfied... —
528:01:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
500:01:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
467:01:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
435:01:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
389:the nominator cites is "are
385:- The key to the portion of
374:12:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
354:11:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
340:03:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
324:00:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
301:06:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
276:23:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
249:22:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
232:03:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
216:22:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
67:18:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
81:Speechless (Lady Gaga song)
73:Speechless (Lady Gaga song)
1137:
1113:Please do not modify it.
473:WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST
32:Please do not modify it.
400:notability guidelines
453:) and Baby Be Mine (
358:Please refrain from
198:due to a failure of
748:12345abcxyz20082009
1068:Stairway to Heaven
451:1,180,000,000 hits
44:The result was
995:
978:comment added by
920:
712:Billboard Hot 100
616:Hot Digital Songs
595:
555:
526:
497:
432:
278:
262:
1128:
1115:
1100:
1095:
994:
972:
924:
918:
863:
855:
833:
755:
749:
721:
658:
629:
594:
591:
585:
551:
545:
543:
538:
522:
520:
519:
516:
493:
487:
485:
480:
447:Thriller (album)
428:
422:
420:
415:
404:reliable sources
402:and coverage in
369:
335:
296:
274:
263:
227:
204:The Fame Monster
189:
188:
174:
122:
104:
64:
60:
56:
34:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1118:deletion review
1111:
1098:
1093:
1026:Fortunato luigi
973:
917:
861:
853:
831:
753:
747:
716:
653:
624:
589:
586:
554:
549:
541:
536:
517:
514:
513:
496:
491:
483:
478:
431:
426:
418:
413:
364:
330:
291:
265:
222:
131:
95:
79:
76:
62:
58:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1134:
1132:
1123:
1122:
1106:
1105:
1082:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1037:
1036:
1014:
996:
965:
948:
931:
909:
890:
873:
841:
823:
805:
784:
761:
731:
730:
729:
728:
690:
689:
667:
666:
665:
637:
636:
600:
599:
562:
561:
560:
546:
505:
504:
503:
502:
488:
438:
437:
423:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
342:
314:performances.
305:
304:
303:
251:
236:
235:
234:
192:
191:
128:
75:
70:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1133:
1121:
1119:
1114:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1096:
1090:
1087:as it passes
1086:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1000:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
969:
966:
964:
960:
956:
952:
949:
947:
943:
939:
935:
932:
930:
929:
925:
923:
913:
910:
908:
904:
900:
899:
894:
891:
889:
885:
881:
877:
874:
872:
869:
865:
864:
857:
856:
849:
845:
842:
840:
837:
836:
834:
827:
824:
822:
819:
818:
813:
809:
806:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
783:
780:
777:
773:
769:
765:
762:
760:
756:
750:
744:
740:
736:
733:
732:
727:
724:
722:
720:
713:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
695:
692:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
671:
668:
664:
661:
659:
657:
650:
649:
648:
645:
642:
639:
638:
635:
632:
630:
628:
621:
617:
613:
610:. And as for
609:
605:
602:
601:
598:
593:
592:
583:
578:
574:
570:
566:
563:
559:
556:
552:
544:
539:
531:
530:
529:
525:
521:
510:
507:
506:
501:
498:
494:
486:
481:
474:
470:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
436:
433:
429:
421:
416:
409:
405:
401:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
375:
372:
370:
368:
361:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
341:
338:
336:
334:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
302:
299:
297:
295:
288:
284:
280:
279:
277:
272:
268:
260:
256:
252:
250:
247:
246:
240:
237:
233:
230:
228:
226:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
193:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
57:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1112:
1109:
1084:
1063:
1043:WP:OTHERCRAP
1022:WP:OTHERCRAP
1016:
998:
967:
950:
933:
926:
921:
911:
896:
892:
875:
859:
851:
843:
829:
825:
815:
807:
786:
763:
738:
734:
718:
674:
669:
655:
640:
626:
603:
588:
581:
573:WP:OTHERCRAP
564:
534:
508:
476:
455:898,000 hits
443:WP:OTHERCRAP
411:
394:
390:
382:
366:
332:
307:
293:
254:
243:
238:
224:
195:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1072:Daniel Case
1064:Strong keep
974:—Preceding
953:Per Gong.--
698:GaGaOohLaLa
643:- per nom.
606:Way passes
459:GaGaOohLaLa
441:Forgetting
408:independent
395:necessarily
346:GaGaOohLaLa
312:Bad Romance
208:GaGaOohLaLa
158:free images
1047:Epeefleche
955:Epeefleche
868:Review me!
854:Aaroncrick
1089:WP:NSONGS
1004:Benchilla
772:WP:NSONGS
677:Hot 100.
675:Billboard
590:Gongshow
577:WP:NSONGS
406:that are
387:WP:NSONGS
271:talk page
200:WP:NSONGS
988:contribs
976:unsigned
922:Bullfish
848:WP:NSONG
832:Chase wc
791:WP:NSONG
679:Frcm1988
608:WP:NSONG
582:Thriller
391:probably
316:Bravedog
125:View log
1094:talking
1017:Delete:
880:Iknow23
846:passes
789:passes
719:Legolas
656:Legolas
627:Legolas
620:Hot 100
367:Legolas
333:Legolas
294:Legolas
225:Legolas
164:WP refs
152:scholar
98:protect
93:history
63:Windows
50:WP:SNOW
980:Tikkuy
795:SveroH
768:WP:GNG
641:Delete
537:Hunter
515:Snotty
509:Delete
479:Hunter
414:Hunter
360:WP:NPA
308:Delete
283:WP:WAX
239:Delete
196:Delete
136:Google
102:delete
55:Fences
48:. Per
1099:birds
999:Keep:
968:Keep:
951:Keep.
938:Aaa16
817:Jimbo
739:every
737:. If
179:JSTOR
140:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
59:&
16:<
1085:Keep
1076:talk
1051:talk
1030:talk
1008:talk
984:talk
959:talk
942:talk
934:Keep
912:Keep
903:talk
898:Cirt
893:Keep
884:talk
876:Keep
862:talk
844:Keep
826:Keep
814:. --
812:WP:N
808:Keep
799:talk
787:Keep
764:Keep
754:talk
735:Keep
702:talk
683:talk
670:Keep
612:WP:N
604:Keep
565:Keep
542:Kahn
524:talk
518:Wong
484:Kahn
463:talk
419:Kahn
383:Keep
350:talk
320:talk
267:J04n
255:Note
245:Dale
212:talk
172:FENS
146:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
46:keep
866:)
776:Mgm
745:.--
186:TWL
123:– (
1078:)
1053:)
1032:)
1010:)
1002:--
990:)
986:•
961:)
944:)
919:DJ
905:)
886:)
801:)
793:--
757:)
717:--
714:.
704:)
696:.
685:)
654:--
625:--
465:)
365:--
352:)
331:--
322:)
292:--
289:.
261:.
223:--
214:)
166:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
1074:(
1049:(
1028:(
1006:(
982:(
957:(
940:(
901:(
882:(
858:(
797:(
778:|
751:(
700:(
681:(
553:)
550:c
547:(
495:)
492:c
489:(
461:(
430:)
427:c
424:(
348:(
318:(
273:)
269:(
264:—
210:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
121:)
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.