660:. These source most just indicated that the films exists and should be covered in WP but not enough signification coverage for their own article. Deseret News article has 171 out of 1356 words (only 12.6%) about the three TV series based films and is not the original sources (Sources: io9.com's "The Secret History of Spider-Man Movies," spidermanfilms.wikia.com, comicbookmovie.com, weminoredinfilm.com's "6 Spider-Man Movies That Almost But Thankfully Didn't Get Made," wikipedia.com). Using WP, WP based sites, WP sourced articles or other wiki powered site (wikia.com) as a source is not allowed. Nor is 12.6% of an article signification coverage. The IO9 has even less about (166 words) the three TV films. And none of the books give signification coverage as the books are not about the three movies, not just about Spider-Man and have brief entries.
714:
option. There were a number of book and a few media sources covering the various movies, but they did not contain much information beyond a plot summary, the connection to the television series and a few interesting tidbits about the production. All in all, I think that these films are extremely relevant to the history of Spider-Man, but that the coverage is just not substantial enough to write a fleshed out article. (Most of the articles do not have many citations to reliable sources, which is why I am proposing a selective merge of the limited cited content).
478:, "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material" - Therefore, some of the list articles do count toward reliable sourcing and discussion of the subject. There are some critical reviews if you scroll past the first page of results, but the content is still pretty light. Hence, my !vote to redirect.
713:
I listed a few potential sources late last night because I was concerned that the deletion nomination would be closed before a proper examination of all possible sources could be performed. I went through Google Books, JSTOR and a few other places, and I am now of the opinion that a merge is the best
455:
The notable coverage you indicate are mostly list articles, blogs or other non-reliable websites thus do not significantly cover any of the three films. (WP:N - "those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time") The reviews link brings up just
606:
Definitely not notable. Article is all plot and the "sources" are from Amazon; I'm not sure what the three "keep" voters above are thinking. Even trying to gather out-of-universe content to improve the article would be next to impossible since a whopping two pages on Google make barely a mention of
759:. Seems to be a legit, made for TV movie (though low budget). Authorised Spider Man Marvel movie, so can't see any reason not to keep it, when others of it's nature are notable for Knowledge (XXG). Article does need more sources. It has its own IMDB page.
434:, but the current article has only two sources, and they're both Amazon. The articles is essentially cast and plot, both of which are at the proposed target. I have no objection to the articles being split out after the sourced content is expanded.
635:
639:. I would strongly reccomend going through JSTOr and Google Books some more before closing this. These are some of the earliest Spider-Man films, and there is some indication that sources are covering these films in that context.
177:
637:
557:
365:
460:"Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, 'capsule reviews', ..."). Reliable notable sources do not current exist.
284:
279:
288:
171:
271:
345:
130:
325:
137:
103:
98:
238:
233:
107:
812:
section of Film notability indicates like the IMDB, "capsule reviews" which are reviews up to 300 words. The Time Out is clearly less than 300 words. --
242:
275:
90:
225:
66:
267:
216:
is not a reason to delete an article. I am also nominating the following related pages because they have the same notability problem:
423:
209:
192:
17:
159:
492:
To the overall length of the list articles generally they have had trival mentions, not more than a few lines just to be complete.
633:
699:
732:
680:
579:
153:
742:
522:
94:
840:
821:
798:
777:
749:
723:
703:
669:
648:
624:
596:
569:
548:
526:
501:
487:
469:
443:
414:
397:
377:
357:
337:
318:
72:
40:
373:
353:
333:
229:
149:
427:
719:
644:
794:
544:
483:
439:
199:
61:
431:
518:
86:
78:
410:
369:
349:
329:
221:
809:
457:
836:
36:
715:
640:
165:
790:
540:
479:
456:
space for reviews or short reviews (not over 300 words) not there for not significant reviews (per
435:
393:
185:
56:
53:
620:
787:
773:
695:
565:
406:
212:
and can be covered in that article. I redirected it but it was reversed by an editor claiming
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
835:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
208:
This supposed film has no reliable sources and is just a strung together set of episodes of
475:
817:
665:
497:
465:
314:
389:
213:
608:
52:. The "keep" !votes are weak but there is clearly no consensus for any other action.
769:
690:
607:
this picture, mainly by non-viable niche sites like comicreview and rateyourmusic.
590:
561:
305:
259:
124:
813:
661:
493:
461:
310:
539:
without any further comment. Surely one of you can explain what's notable...
517:. Notable. Though I do agree the article does need more sources.--
829:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
735:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
683:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
582:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
558:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
788:
https://www.timeout.com/london/film/spider-man-strikes-back
366:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
301:
297:
293:
255:
251:
247:
120:
116:
112:
184:
689:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
741:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
588:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
198:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
843:). No further edits should be made to this page.
346:list of Television-related deletion discussions
786:I've added a review from British Mag Time Out
632:I found three more sources for the 1977 film:
8:
556:Note: This debate has been included in the
364:Note: This debate has been included in the
344:Note: This debate has been included in the
324:Note: This debate has been included in the
555:
363:
343:
323:
326:list of Film-related deletion discussions
768:IMDB is not an indicator of notability.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
424:The Amazing Spider-Man (TV series)
268:Spider-Man: The Dragon's Challenge
210:The Amazing Spider-Man (TV series)
24:
426:. It has received some notable
1:
860:
570:23:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
549:19:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
527:18:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
502:00:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
488:19:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
470:19:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
444:15:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
415:13:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
398:08:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
378:22:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
358:22:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
338:22:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
319:22:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
832:Please do not modify it.
822:12:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
799:12:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
778:12:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
750:05:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
724:17:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
704:13:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
670:13:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
649:06:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
535:Three editors have said
73:04:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
625:00:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
597:01:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
405:. Clearly notable. --
388:. Clearly notable. --
87:Spider-Man Strikes Back
79:Spider-Man Strikes Back
222:Spider-Man (1977 film)
519:Total-Truth-Teller-24
752:
706:
702:
622:
599:
572:
380:
370:Shawn in Montreal
360:
350:Shawn in Montreal
340:
330:Shawn in Montreal
851:
834:
761:
760:
747:
740:
738:
736:
698:
688:
686:
684:
621:
618:
613:
593:
587:
585:
583:
309:
291:
263:
245:
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
859:
858:
854:
853:
852:
850:
849:
848:
847:
841:deletion review
830:
753:
743:
731:
729:
716:Spirit of Eagle
711:Selective Merge
707:
679:
677:
641:Spirit of Eagle
614:
609:
600:
591:
578:
576:
282:
266:
236:
220:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
857:
855:
846:
845:
825:
824:
802:
801:
791:Deathlibrarian
783:
782:
781:
780:
763:
762:
739:
728:
727:
726:
687:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
652:
651:
627:
586:
575:
574:
573:
553:
552:
551:
541:Argento Surfer
530:
529:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
480:Argento Surfer
447:
446:
436:Argento Surfer
417:
400:
382:
381:
361:
341:
321:
264:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
856:
844:
842:
838:
833:
827:
826:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
804:
803:
800:
796:
792:
789:
785:
784:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
765:
764:
758:
755:
754:
751:
748:
746:
745:Winged Blades
737:
734:
725:
721:
717:
712:
709:
708:
705:
701:
697:
694:
693:
685:
682:
671:
667:
663:
659:
656:
655:
654:
653:
650:
646:
642:
638:
636:
634:
631:
628:
626:
623:
619:
617:
612:
605:
602:
601:
598:
595:
594:
584:
581:
571:
567:
563:
559:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
512:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:
471:
467:
463:
459:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
418:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
322:
320:
316:
312:
307:
303:
299:
295:
290:
286:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
244:
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
831:
828:
810:WP:NFSOURCES
805:
756:
744:
730:
710:
691:
678:
657:
629:
615:
610:
603:
589:
577:
536:
514:
458:WP:NFSOURCES
452:
419:
407:Impending IP
402:
385:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
172:free images
808:. Per the
390:Rob Sinden
214:Notability
837:talk page
562:• Gene93k
37:talk page
839:or in a
770:★Trekker
733:Relisted
700:contribs
681:Relisted
580:Relisted
453:Comment:
428:coverage
420:Redirect
131:View log
39:or in a
806:Comment
692:MRD2014
658:Comment
630:Comment
592:MBisanz
432:reviews
285:protect
280:history
239:protect
234:history
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
604:Delete
476:WP:GNG
289:delete
243:delete
150:Google
108:delete
814:Spshu
662:Spshu
611:sixty
494:Spshu
462:Spshu
311:Spshu
306:views
298:watch
294:links
260:views
252:watch
248:links
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
818:talk
795:talk
774:talk
757:Keep
720:talk
666:talk
645:talk
616:nine
566:talk
545:talk
537:Keep
523:talk
515:Keep
498:talk
484:talk
474:Per
466:talk
440:talk
430:and
411:talk
403:Keep
394:talk
386:Keep
374:talk
354:talk
334:talk
315:talk
302:logs
276:talk
272:edit
256:logs
230:talk
226:edit
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
422:to
200:TWL
129:– (
820:)
797:)
776:)
722:)
696:📞
668:)
647:)
568:)
560:.
547:)
525:)
500:)
486:)
468:)
442:)
413:)
396:)
376:)
368:.
356:)
348:.
336:)
328:.
317:)
304:|
300:|
296:|
292:|
287:|
283:|
278:|
274:|
258:|
254:|
250:|
246:|
241:|
237:|
232:|
228:|
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
816:(
793:(
772:(
718:(
664:(
643:(
564:(
543:(
521:(
496:(
482:(
464:(
438:(
409:(
392:(
372:(
352:(
332:(
313:(
308:)
270:(
262:)
224:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.