243:. Both parties fight each with a huge determination and its supporters almost hate each other. Kaczynski did say that indeed, which resulted in some media coverage in Poland at the time but now it is insignificant. Politicians say many different things. Now days however, this incident is used by people who do not support Kaczynski to discredit him in the eyes of others. This is exactly what is happening here. Polish internal political fights are brought into English Knowledge and this is not a place for it.--
445:. Are we going to create articles about all remarks of politicians? This is a silly article, about an unsignificant utterance, made during an informal conversation. It has been blown out of proportions by some Kaczynski bashers, and to keep Knowledge neutral, there is no space for such crap. Or perhaps we should write an article about Polish prime minister Donald Tusk chewing a gum during a meeting with Angela Merkel.
31:
176:
pending the addition of reliable sources. Based on the see also section, it seems there is some precedent for articles like this, although it does need to be references, flirting with BLP-related stuff as it does. Unfortunately, as I don't speak Polish, I'm probably not the best person to go looking
519:- this was news in Poland for like two days way back when (can't even remember when, more than a year+), it was a "catch phrase" for maybe a week ... it's like making a Wiki page based on some joke that Jay Leno/Conan O'Brian told. Nothing notable. And of course, no sources.
260:. Article is barely sourced. If this can be sourced and has any significance besides being an insulting comment spoken by a politician seven years ago, it can be merged into the article about the speaker,
227:
This "famous" saying of
Kaczynski is not as famous as the creator of the article claims. For the background information, in Poland right now the political scene in dominated by two parties,
287:. It is a significant phrase (if it were American there would probably be an article on it), but the information can probably best be presented within the article on LK.--
202:
If more sources are added and I don't come back to change my comment, please consider this a neutral. Currently the only "source" is the original polish conversation.
152:
364:
308:
336:
40:
119:
114:
123:
106:
561:
17:
469:
507:
543:
65:
46:
542:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
528:
511:
486:
454:
434:
409:
379:
351:
323:
296:
271:
268:
252:
215:
190:
167:
88:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
110:
503:
397:
427:
418:
392:. The instant title is very unlikely as a search term for readers of the English Knowledge, which
375:
347:
319:
288:
265:
292:
240:
524:
479:
280:
248:
102:
94:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
405:
450:
422:
236:
499:
465:
389:
371:
343:
315:
261:
228:
83:
555:
203:
178:
520:
475:
393:
244:
164:
140:
401:
232:
160:
446:
163:. It is un-encyclopedic and contains little content other than "he said it".
78:
502:) - as this has gone on to a whole life of its own as a catch-phrase.
536:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
421:
and all the above. Topic does not merit its own article. --
400:
isn't particularly helpful as an article title either. -
147:
136:
132:
128:
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
546:). No further edits should be made to this page.
365:list of Language-related deletion discussions
309:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
77:. Without sources it can't even be merged. +
337:list of Poland-related deletion discussions
359:
331:
303:
363:: This debate has been included in the
335:: This debate has been included in the
307:: This debate has been included in the
45:For an explanation of the process, see
476:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
159:Unreferenced POV article that fails
24:
41:deletion review on 2010 August 19
29:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
470:Polish Knowledge AfD from 2007
396:. In the absence of context,
1:
468:per Ihcoyc. For the record:
578:
529:22:37, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
512:12:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
487:15:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
455:22:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
435:15:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
410:15:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
380:11:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
352:11:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
324:11:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
297:11:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
272:06:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
253:06:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
216:03:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
191:03:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
168:03:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
47:Knowledge:Deletion review
562:Pages at deletion review
539:Please do not modify it.
89:16:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
61:Please do not modify it.
394:ought to be in English
398:Piss off, old man!
241:Jaroslaw Kaczynski
177:for sources here.
432:
382:
368:
354:
340:
326:
312:
103:Spieprzaj dziadu!
95:Spieprzaj dziadu!
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
569:
541:
504:PasswordUsername
484:
482:
431:
428:
369:
341:
313:
150:
144:
126:
73:The result was
63:
33:
32:
26:
577:
576:
572:
571:
570:
568:
567:
566:
552:
551:
550:
544:deletion review
537:
485:
480:
474:
429:
402:Smerdis of Tlön
237:Law and Justice
146:
117:
101:
98:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
575:
573:
565:
564:
554:
553:
549:
548:
532:
531:
514:
500:Lech Kaczynski
489:
473:
466:Lech Kaczynski
458:
457:
438:
437:
412:
390:Lech Kaczynski
383:
357:
355:
329:
327:
300:
299:
281:Lech Kaczyński
274:
266:Metropolitan90
262:Lech Kaczynski
255:
229:Civic Platform
221:
220:
219:
218:
211:
208:
194:
193:
186:
183:
157:
156:
97:
92:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
574:
563:
560:
559:
557:
547:
545:
540:
534:
533:
530:
526:
522:
518:
515:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
488:
483:
477:
471:
467:
463:
460:
459:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
436:
433:
426:
425:
420:
419:WP:NOTABILITY
416:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
381:
377:
373:
366:
362:
358:
356:
353:
349:
345:
338:
334:
330:
328:
325:
321:
317:
310:
306:
302:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
273:
270:
267:
263:
259:
256:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
222:
217:
214:
213:
212:
209:
206:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
192:
189:
188:
187:
184:
181:
175:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
162:
154:
149:
142:
138:
134:
130:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
96:
93:
91:
90:
87:
86:
82:
81:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
538:
535:
516:
495:
491:
461:
442:
423:
414:
385:
360:
332:
304:
284:
276:
257:
224:
205:
204:
199:
180:
179:
173:
158:
84:
79:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
233:Donald Tusk
424:Poeticbent
200:To closer:
372:Thryduulf
344:Thryduulf
316:Thryduulf
556:Category
441:Obvious
289:Kotniski
153:View log
245:Jacurek
120:protect
115:history
517:Delete
443:delete
417:, per
415:Delete
269:(talk)
258:Delete
225:Delete
174:Delete
148:delete
124:delete
75:delete
521:radek
496:merge
481:talk
462:Merge
447:Tymek
386:Merge
283:, or
279:with
277:Merge
165:Ostap
151:) – (
141:views
133:watch
129:links
16:<
525:talk
508:talk
498:(to
492:Keep
451:talk
430:talk
406:talk
376:talk
361:Note
348:talk
333:Note
320:talk
305:Note
293:talk
285:keep
264:. --
249:talk
235:and
210:fold
207:Hers
185:fold
182:Hers
161:WP:N
137:logs
111:talk
107:edit
494:or
472:.--
464:to
388:to
239:of
231:of
558::
527:)
510:)
453:)
408:)
378:)
367:.
350:)
339:.
322:)
311:.
295:)
251:)
139:|
135:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
85:gr
80:An
43:.
523:(
506:(
478:|
449:(
404:(
374:(
370:—
346:(
342:—
318:(
314:—
291:(
247:(
155:)
145:(
143:)
105:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.