Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Spirit Spine - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

217:
the Tripwire ones are certainly reliable - blogs, yes, but blogs published at a reputable website. Sort of like an opinion piece in the NYT is reliable because it's published in the NYT, while it wouldn't be considered an RS on say, blogspot. I'd say fork/knife probably counts as reputable, even
249: 292: 123: 199:
All I see are blogs none which I would not consider a reliable source. I also can find no reliable sources on Google. Also checking
17: 90: 85: 94: 222:
a blogspot site - taking a look at the bands they've interviewed they must have some pull. BTR, imo, also probably passes.
185:
covered in multiple, reliable sources independent of the article topic would be me paraphrasing. See point 1 of WP:MUSIC.
77: 432: 36: 374: 431:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
130:
Non-notable musical artist. Speedy contested bye editor whose first and only edits were to remove the CSD.
260: 417: 386: 365: 348: 322: 318: 304: 282: 264: 231: 212: 194: 180: 161: 139: 59: 331: 81: 343: 300: 382: 227: 190: 157: 73: 65: 410: 278: 208: 176: 135: 395: 273:
without prejudice. Not yet notable. A few online mentions isn't enough to establish notability.
169: 149: 361: 256: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
314: 335: 296: 399: 378: 223: 203:
I see total of 68 plays over the last 6 months for this artist who has no description.
186: 153: 55: 403: 274: 204: 172: 131: 357: 111: 50: 356:. Numerous blog mentions imply notability within the indie rock community. 200: 373:
The only source I could find that *might* be considered reliable is
398:. The primary sources I find are blogs, and the only coverage in 425:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
250:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
168:
not arguing, but can you point out what exactly passes
118: 107: 103: 99: 293:list of Living people-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 435:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 402:really isn't "substantial". Per ThaddeusB. 244: 248:: This debate has been included in the 291:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 394:Doesn't meet the guidelines at 1: 452: 377:and that is not enough. -- 428:Please do not modify it. 418:22:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 387:14:55, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 366:22:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 349:17:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 323:03:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 305:00:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 283:12:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 265:12:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 232:11:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 213:11:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 195:11:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 181:11:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 162:11:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 140:09:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 60:07:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 307: 267: 253: 443: 430: 414: 407: 400:reliable sources 346: 341: 330:. Clearly fails 287: 254: 148:, easily passes 121: 115: 97: 34: 451: 450: 446: 445: 444: 442: 441: 440: 439: 433:deletion review 426: 412: 405: 344: 336: 313:. Not notable. 117: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 449: 447: 438: 437: 421: 420: 389: 368: 351: 325: 308: 285: 268: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 165: 164: 128: 127: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 448: 436: 434: 429: 423: 422: 419: 416: 415: 409: 408: 401: 397: 393: 390: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 367: 363: 359: 355: 352: 350: 347: 342: 339: 333: 329: 326: 324: 320: 316: 312: 309: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 266: 262: 258: 251: 247: 243: 242: 233: 229: 225: 221: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 197: 196: 192: 188: 184: 183: 182: 178: 174: 171: 167: 166: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 144: 143: 142: 141: 137: 133: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 427: 424: 411: 404: 391: 370: 353: 337: 327: 310: 288: 270: 257:TexasAndroid 245: 219: 145: 129: 74:Spirit Spine 66:Spirit Spine 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 332:WP:MUSICBIO 315:Niteshift36 297:Erwin85Bot 218:though it 379:ThaddeusB 224:Ironholds 187:Ironholds 154:Ironholds 396:WP:MUSIC 275:Hairhorn 205:Ridernyc 173:Ridernyc 170:WP:MUSIC 150:WP:MUSIC 132:Ridernyc 124:View log 358:Djd1219 201:last.fm 91:protect 86:history 392:Delete 371:Delete 328:Delete 311:Delete 271:Delete 119:delete 95:delete 46:delete 406:Jamie 345:vecia 122:) – ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 383:talk 375:this 362:talk 354:Keep 340:enna 319:talk 301:talk 295:. -- 289:Note 279:talk 261:talk 246:Note 228:talk 209:talk 191:talk 177:talk 158:talk 146:Keep 136:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 413:S93 255:-- 385:) 364:) 334:. 321:) 303:) 281:) 263:) 252:. 230:) 220:is 211:) 193:) 179:) 160:) 152:. 138:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 48:. 381:( 360:( 338:ل 317:( 299:( 277:( 259:( 226:( 207:( 189:( 175:( 156:( 134:( 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
07:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Spirit Spine
Spirit Spine
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Ridernyc
talk
09:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
WP:MUSIC
Ironholds
talk
11:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
WP:MUSIC
Ridernyc
talk
11:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Ironholds

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.