198:
range are not by default notable enough for an article, and there is absolutely nothing whatever to suggest that this is in any way an exceptional school. I put a PROD on this article back in 2011, and never went back to the article again until today, when I found that DGG, who tends to be rather towards the inclusionist end of the spectrum, had removed the PROD with edit summary "merge to locality, as usually for such aschools ". However, that is missing the point: schools run by what in the USA is called a "school district" are commonly merged to an article about that school district. Schools in a country such as the UK, where there is no such thing as a school district, are sometimes merged to an article about the local council or the area which the local council governs (though this is much less satisfactory, as it tends to give undue weight to a school, which is a much smaller proportion of the whole council's concern than it would be of a body that just runs schools). However, the school in this case is a privately owned business, and does not have a suitable public body to be merged to.
197:
This does not satisfy any of the notability guidelines. This is a
British preparatory school. For any non-British person who doesn't know, that means a private school which takes pupils up to either age 11 or 13 - in this case the range is 4 to 13. Consensus has long been that schools for this age
303:
about the school in unsourced. I also see no reason to think this fairly small (400 pupils) private lower school is in any way remarkable, and it is not clear why it should be considered notable enough to warrant a section in that article.
166:
299:
in earlier versions of the school article. However, I may have missed the particular edit where content was merged, so I will be grateful if anyone can provide a diff. The section of
119:
160:
235:
215:
295:, and I can't see that the content added to the latter came from the former: it looks to me quite independent. Nor have I managed to find any source of content of
126:
92:
87:
96:
79:
17:
181:
148:
332:
52:
I am still unconvinced that this school is notable enough to justify inclusion at all, but a redirect will do no harm.
40:
142:
313:
278:
247:
227:
207:
61:
138:
83:
188:
309:
203:
57:
328:
274:
36:
266:
288:
75:
67:
174:
154:
305:
243:
223:
199:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
327:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
270:
239:
219:
113:
300:
296:
292:
257:
321:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
265:
included prior to this discussion and a redirect plainly meets
109:
105:
101:
173:
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
335:). No further edits should be made to this page.
269:. This can be speedily disposed of, I suggest.
8:
236:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
234:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:list of England-related deletion discussions
214:Note: This debate has been included in the
287:I have compared the content of the article
233:
213:
50:Nomination withdrawn, article redirected.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
261:. The key content had already been
24:
1:
314:17:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
279:20:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
258:Spratton#Spratton Hall School
248:00:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
228:00:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
208:21:03, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
62:07:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
352:
324:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
291:with recent edits to
289:Spratton Hall School
76:Spratton Hall School
68:Spratton Hall School
250:
230:
343:
326:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
48:The result was
34:
351:
350:
346:
345:
344:
342:
341:
340:
339:
333:deletion review
322:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
349:
347:
338:
337:
318:
317:
316:
282:
281:
252:
251:
231:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
348:
336:
334:
330:
325:
319:
315:
311:
307:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
323:
320:
306:JamesBWatson
262:
256:Redirect to
255:
200:JamesBWatson
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
54:JamesBWatson
49:
47:
31:
28:
271:TerriersFan
267:WP:Redirect
161:free images
329:talk page
240:• Gene93k
220:• Gene93k
37:talk page
331:or in a
301:Spratton
297:Spratton
293:Spratton
120:View log
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
263:merged
139:Google
97:delete
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
310:talk
275:talk
244:talk
224:talk
204:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
189:TWL
118:– (
312:)
277:)
246:)
238:.
226:)
218:.
206:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
308:(
273:(
242:(
222:(
202:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.