279:
to try and clarify which body is notable. I think is intended to apply to city wide bodies. If you take the examples listed (Toronto, Chicago, San
Francisco and London) and include councillors in the count you would have 44, 50, 11 and around 1,500 people in each city notable for being elected.
193:
Actually it states they are only like to be notable if they "(a) represent a historic first, such as the first woman, first person of colour or first LGBT person elected to a council, or (b) have received national or international press coverage" which I don't think is the case here.
130:, which specifically states local politicians and candidates for office are not automatically notable. The article fails to assert notability for anything else and reads remarkably like his own website.
222:
But he's on a
Councillor on a Borough Council. London has (I think) 32 of them, each with 60 or so members. If he wins the parliamentary seat, he becomes sufficiently notable, but for now,
307:
In light of that, I interpret these borough councils to be sub-municipal bodies. I am a strong proponent of keeping articles on municipal councillors, but this seems a little far.
119:
52:. Certainly no bias against recreation if his career advances further in a way noted by reliable sources, or if concensus on the inherent notability of his position changes.
208:"although precedent has favoured keeping councillors of major, internationally famous metropolitan cities such as Toronto, Chicago, San Francisco or London, as well as..."
17:
92:
87:
96:
243:- are these borough councils the highest municipal authority in London, or is there some kind of city-wide council as well?
79:
334:
148:
per nom and ample precedent that being a local councillor and/or a parliamentary candidate does not confer notability.
36:
316:
248:
153:
333:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
285:
266:
258:
231:
199:
135:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
312:
244:
149:
57:
320:
289:
276:
270:
252:
235:
217:
203:
188:
165:
157:
139:
61:
49:
281:
262:
227:
195:
131:
213:
184:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
83:
53:
127:
175:
likely notable enough for articles, even if councillors in most cities generally aren't.
209:
180:
113:
75:
67:
311:, although I'd be happy to reconsider if I'm misinterpreting anything.
169:
48:
per the consensus below. Brings up an interesting conversation at
168:) is that local councillors in major metropolitan cities such as
327:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
164:
For what it's worth, common practice on
Knowledge (XXG) (see
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
337:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:In light of this I've started a discussion on
8:
280:Please pop across and voice and opinion!
126:Fails to meet the notability criteria of
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
62:21:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
321:22:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
290:11:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
271:22:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
253:21:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
236:18:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
218:18:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
204:17:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
189:17:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
179:, just $ 0.02 for the pot.
158:14:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
140:13:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
354:
257:The city-wide body is the
241:Question from the ignorant
330:Please do not modify it.
259:Greater London Authority
32:Please do not modify it.
313:Sarcasticidealist
245:Sarcasticidealist
345:
332:
150:Timrollpickering
117:
99:
34:
353:
352:
348:
347:
346:
344:
343:
342:
341:
335:deletion review
328:
90:
74:
71:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
351:
349:
340:
339:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
282:BlinkingBlimey
196:BlinkingBlimey
161:
160:
132:BlinkingBlimey
124:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
350:
338:
336:
331:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
291:
287:
283:
278:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
192:
191:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
167:
163:
162:
159:
155:
151:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
129:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
329:
326:
308:
306:
240:
223:
176:
172:
145:
125:
45:
43:
31:
28:
277:WP:OUTCOMES
166:WP:OUTCOMES
76:Stuart King
68:Stuart King
54:Pastordavid
50:WP:OUTCOMES
120:View log
210:Bearcat
181:Bearcat
177:No vote
93:protect
88:history
309:Delete
224:Delete
170:London
146:Delete
128:WP:BIO
97:delete
46:Delete
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
317:talk
286:talk
267:talk
263:fchd
261:. -
249:talk
232:talk
228:fchd
214:talk
200:talk
185:talk
154:talk
136:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
173:are
118:– (
319:)
288:)
269:)
251:)
234:)
226:-
216:)
202:)
187:)
156:)
138:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
315:(
284:(
265:(
247:(
230:(
212:(
198:(
183:(
152:(
134:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.