401:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
378:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later. Also, significantly, this is an inadequately-sourced BLP in a controversial area.
432:- not notable by virtue of being a Playmate, and I can't find any significant coverage of her in reliable sources. By the way, 'delete' here means 'delete', not 'merge & redirect to a list', for the reasons given by Dekkapai above - if a person is non-notable, we shouldn't have an article on them at all. Merging to a list doesn't affect the lack of notability.
406:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
405:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
369:
This should have been done after consensus determined
Playmate-hood's non-notability. Other projects can cover this material, Knowledge (XXG) consensus has determined that Knowledge (XXG) is not that project. Should sourcing and claim of notability sufficient for Knowledge (XXG) later be found, the
188:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
261:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled.
328:. From that google news search, Dallas Morning News May 19, 1996, May 4, 1996, New York Daily News - Feb 29, 1996. BTW, I don't read a "playmatehood" exception to the GNG or BASIC. What qualifies as trivia is discussed in note 6 of
149:
231:
295:- Playmate of the Year award satisfies PORNBIO, whether it is a strategic commercial decision or not. Google news hits reveals various reliable sources that cover the subject to satisfy
397:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
325:
143:
110:
211:
208:
17:
258:
83:
78:
48:. Procedural keep because the nomination and subsequent discussion is tainted by the noms topic ban. can be immediately relisted.
87:
266:
313:
Playmate of the Year is not an award. What did you find on gnews that qualifies as non-trivial coverage about the subject? --
70:
164:
402:
131:
535:
36:
485:
262:
410:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
534:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
337:
304:
125:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
520:
493:
458:
441:
424:
387:
355:
341:
320:
308:
287:
270:
246:
223:
200:
121:
52:
478:
413:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
171:
383:
333:
300:
157:
468:
398:
513:
437:
74:
329:
296:
420:
283:
242:
219:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
407:
137:
347:
314:
194:
379:
408:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
508:
451:
433:
66:
58:
416:
279:
238:
215:
49:
104:
193:
are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria.
471:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
346:
Trivial coverage is excluded. It does not support notability. Per GNG. --
180:
Being a
Playboy playmate does not makes you notable. Being chosen
528:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
504:
Nomination was made in violation of a still active topic ban
232:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
505:
100:
96:
92:
156:
476:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
170:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
538:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
230:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:, the depth that goes beyond just trivial.
229:
207:Note: This debate has been added to the
449:meets GNG, also playmate of the year.--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
259:List of Playboy Playmates of 1995
1:
370:article can be re-started.
555:
388:19:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
342:17:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
321:14:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
309:14:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
288:14:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
271:02:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
247:01:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
224:01:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
201:00:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
531:Please do not modify it.
521:02:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
189:solely related to their
53:14:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
494:03:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
459:02:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
442:23:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
425:14:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
356:20:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
209:WikiProject Pornography
263:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
182:Playmate of the Month
186:Playmate of the Year
326:That dog don't hunt
278:as per Hullaballoo
403:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
44:The result was
518:
496:
457:
415:
352:
318:
249:
235:
212:list of deletions
198:
546:
533:
514:
511:
492:
490:
483:
475:
473:
456:
411:
353:
350:
316:
236:
226:
196:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
554:
553:
549:
548:
547:
545:
544:
543:
542:
536:deletion review
529:
517:
509:
502:Procedural Keep
486:
479:
477:
466:
395:Procedural Keep
348:
206:
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
552:
550:
541:
540:
524:
523:
515:
498:
497:
474:
463:
462:
461:
444:
427:
391:
390:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
334:Morbidthoughts
301:Morbidthoughts
290:
273:
251:
250:
227:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
551:
539:
537:
532:
526:
525:
522:
519:
512:
506:
503:
500:
499:
495:
491:
489:
484:
482:
472:
470:
465:
464:
460:
454:
453:
448:
445:
443:
439:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
409:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
375:
368:
365:
357:
354:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
322:
319:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
233:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
205:
204:
203:
202:
199:
192:
187:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:Stacy Sanches
64:
63:
60:
59:Stacy Sanches
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
530:
527:
501:
487:
480:
467:
450:
446:
429:
412:
394:
373:
371:
366:
292:
275:
254:
191:playmatehood
190:
185:
181:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
144:free images
399:WP:BEFORE
380:Dekkappai
239:• Gene93k
216:• Gene93k
481:Baseball
469:Relisted
452:Milowent
434:Robofish
376:redirect
330:WP:BASIC
297:WP:BASIC
276:Redirect
255:Redirect
111:View log
488:Watcher
417:Carrite
349:Damiens
315:Damiens
280:Hasteur
195:Damiens
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
430:Delete
367:Delete
122:Google
88:delete
510:Monty
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
447:Keep
438:talk
421:talk
384:talk
338:talk
305:talk
293:Keep
284:talk
267:talk
243:talk
220:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
516:845
374:NOT
372:Do
351:.rf
317:.rf
257:to
237:--
197:.rf
184:or
172:TWL
109:– (
507:.
455:•
440:)
423:)
386:)
340:)
332:.
307:)
286:)
269:)
245:)
234:.
222:)
214:.
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
436:(
419:(
382:(
336:(
303:(
282:(
265:(
241:(
218:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.