Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/StarCraft storyline - Knowledge

Source 📝

638:(De-indenting somewhat). Yes, it would be a substantially different article than what's present now, certainly, but I do think the article name itself is fine, and that the content from the existing articles could be used to create part of the the article I'm thinking about. It'd be one thing if they were full of nonsense, but they're not, so I'll accept that there's some potential usage there. I suppose one could start over from scratch, but I see no reason to do that. 884:- Though these should probably be transferred to another wiki, as this content should probably be somewhere on the web, just not a general encyclopedia. The only way this could be more detailed if it was a transcript. There's already a good enough summary in the main article, so I don't think a tedious merge needs to be done. 1031:. Please note that what's being proposed for deletion are not just the specific articles on each episode, but also the main StarCraft storyline article. I agree that there is too much detail, but given the notability and length of the work, one separate "storyline" article is appropriate. So, merge all into 610:
It seems you are under the impression that I'm disagreeing with that particular concern? I am not. However, I am saying something which you seem to be missing. I am saying that because the Starcraft universe has expanded beyond the video game, because there are stories that are part of a cohesive
559:
Actually, I think part of the problem is that the article isn't covering the other Starcraft works. Believe it or not, Blizzard has commissioned authors to write novels set in the Starcraft universe. Each of which has its own article written pretty closely to the Episode articles you're pointing at.
583:
So what? I already said there may need to be a lot of restyling to bring these things into a more suitable form. I am not disagreeing with you that there is some cleanup necessary. I do think, however, the subject itself could be appropriately covered. Given that there's nothing obviously wrong
549:
But that article would do nothing other than serve as plot summary of overly great detail. The scale of the articles is a bit misleading- there are only two video games being involved here, and they don't need such a microscopic level of detail. Right now, the summaries in their articles seem
125:. They basically outline the story of Starcraft on a level-by-level, mission-by-mission scope, which is wholly unnecessary. Plot summaries must be succinct and kept as small as possible to provide major relevant details- not to detail every piece of a campaign. I believe the main articles 1276:
states that "a plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic." As a side note, I haven't actively edited WP in a while (as my edit history will show) but I came to this page after reading with interest the articles in question and then noting the AFD tag above them.
1345:. -- Knowledge does not need to have restrictions on size, yes the story-line is long, but we aren't restricted by that. The plot is a very important part of the game and should have an equally important part of the starcraft series on wikipedia. 620:
What you're suggesting isn't a merge though- it's creating an entirely new article. These articles don't incorporate anything other than the missions/bonus missions (ie, they don't cover the game's universe- just the game itself).
1096:
concisely fit into the main article, that would be ideal (but is it plausible?). Still, that would require a highly selective merge rather than deletion. By the way, I love the piped link to your talk page: "conspire" ;) --
980:
than a straight deletion that sees months or years of effort blown to shit. Plotlines of any notable media are within jurisdiction of the project, and there are no apparent barriers to migrate and adapt contents there. ╫
539:
I think one page on the Starcraft Storyline overall would be appropriate, given that with the creation of additional works in the series, it could be helpful to cover the otherwise acceptable material in one location.
1301:, what you just said is a good reason to keep the page. I've also come to AfD because I originally saw an article I considered important that was tagged for deletion (well, already deleted, actually). Unfortunately, 1045:
As this will primarily consist of deleting many paragraphs in their entirety, it should not take too much time. I am willing to do the merge and subsequent trimming if the consensus is judged to be "merge". --
573:
The thing is, these articles don't cover anything except for the in-game campaigns. No novels, no board games, no comics, nothing. It's strictly a rehashing of every level and bonus mission of the video game.
1362:
games. Practically every game summarises plot information in a few paragraphs on the game page. There is no need to transcribe everything in the game onto Knowledge; that would be copyright violation. --
1106:
Starcraft has three episodes, Brood War has three episodes. Each article covers the three. The episodes aren't anything special either- it's just the name given to the Zerg/Terran/Protoss missions. --
52:
into consideration, proves too large for those articles, creation of a separate 'storyline' article may be warranted, but I don't see any consensus that the sub-articles are called for at this time.
1325:
articles. These chapter summaries almost transcribe the exact events of one game and its expansion, as well as a bonus campaign. They are so in-depth that they border on copyright infringement. --
520: 564:. I think I'd prefer something that covered the scope of the works in one article, though perhaps with a lot of restyling to try to bring things into a more suitable form. 1219:
out there that doesn't even go near the level detail these articles cover. This doesn't help people who know nothing about StarCraft and doesn't help big fans of the game.
114: 1187:, as in: Knowledge is not a textbook, faq, instruction manual, or collection of plot summaries. I'd also hope Knowledge is not a gaming manual. I'd be happy if 1088:
covers only the first three and it is already of medium length. Given how extensive the work is, I think a separate article for the StarCraft storyline to
716: 481: 476: 137:, we should not simply be regurgitating plot summaries of a popular video game. While I usually hate bundling deletions, I feel these are all necessary: 485: 251: 246: 1305:
doesn't seem to have any success as an anti-deletion argument anymore. Anyway, what's your opinion that this sort of article should instead be at a
435: 430: 389: 384: 297: 292: 255: 205: 200: 468: 439: 393: 343: 338: 301: 209: 159: 154: 87: 82: 1059:? If we need more (and I disagree that we need more), we need it with the real-world context. If that's sufficient detail, we don't need more. - 347: 238: 163: 91: 961:
How do you propose we clean up and how do we remove specific details without making it a carbon copy of the plot summaries on other pages? --
422: 376: 284: 192: 1074: 919: 757: 330: 146: 74: 951: 660:
to Wikibooks; The two respective sections on the main pages are more effective than the nine whole articles listed here. See also:
1231: 17: 977: 946: 1313: 1196: 48:. Concerns regarding sourcing were not addressed. If the amount of storyline material, after taking attribution and 593:
What's wrong with these pages is the content is an unneeded amount of detail and it is already nicely summed up in
1370: 1349: 1333: 1316: 1285: 1256: 1244: 1199: 1175: 1163: 1119: 1110: 1101: 1079: 1050: 1039: 1015: 989: 965: 956: 924: 888: 874: 854: 842: 810: 790: 764: 736: 723: 707: 682: 642: 625: 615: 605: 588: 578: 568: 554: 544: 530: 510: 56: 1387: 472: 36: 242: 1386:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1070: 915: 752: 426: 380: 288: 196: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
687:
Added Wikibooks as a possible candidate for having a rather detailed not-summary of plot (and characters, and
334: 150: 78: 1144: 941: 464: 639: 612: 585: 565: 541: 234: 1140: 418: 372: 280: 1032: 1028: 932:
The article can be salvaged, but it needs to have the ridiculously specific information removed from it.
326: 142: 70: 62: 1282: 1212: 696: 1363: 1326: 1152: 870: 799: 783: 598: 188: 130: 1237: 1060: 905: 747: 584:
about these pages, I don't see deletion is a necessary step. Editing and cleanup can fix things.
1156: 1115:
Oh. Thanks for the clarification. I have changed my recommendation accordingly (see below). --
933: 672: 561: 688: 1188: 1160: 1159:. The individual episode titles and "StarCraft storyline" are all plausible search terms. -- 1116: 1098: 1047: 1036: 828: 601:. There's no need to provide an article dedicated entirely to the missions of a video game. -- 527: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1302: 1298: 1278: 1265: 885: 1321:
The articles aren't plot summaries. Plot summaries can already be found in the respective
863: 1225: 1172: 851: 665: 1346: 1273: 1208: 1184: 807: 661: 134: 49: 611:
whole, it might be worth considering an article connecting the various materials.
1012: 986: 733: 700: 53: 1223:
if someone doesn't want to lose this prose, but this stuff isn't suitable for WP.
502: 456: 410: 364: 318: 272: 226: 180: 108: 1306: 997: 896:. This isn't a summary. This isn't an overview. This isn't a synopsis. This is a 1269: 1253: 1216: 1107: 962: 720: 704: 679: 678:, which I'm fairly convinced will never come close to the preceding guidelines. 622: 602: 575: 551: 507: 1148: 1085: 1056: 901: 774: 594: 126: 122: 1211:. The amount of detail for this game's story is ridiculous. There's longer 744:. Only a summary is really needed, this isn't like the Star Wars movies. 1084:
StarCraft has 10 or so episodes, I think. The current plot summary at
1055:
Why can't the plot of StarCraft be dealt with in an appropriate way in
1035:
and then heavily trim them, leaving only the most important parts. --
1009: 983: 703:, since it was obvious gameguide material in an earlier incarnation). 973:
Obviously, this isn't a place for articles dedicated to plotlines. A
121:
This series of article presents an extreme amount of undue weight to
778:
article. These separate articles are simply extended summaries of a
1092:
a short summary in the main article is appropriate. If everything
1380:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1143:, which seems to be just one campaign in one version, and 1171:, notable, lengthy enough to warrant separate articles. 498: 494: 490: 452: 448: 444: 406: 402: 398: 360: 356: 352: 314: 310: 306: 268: 264: 260: 222: 218: 214: 176: 172: 168: 104: 100: 96: 695:
sure what the rules are over there, but things like
521:
list of science fiction or fantasy-related deletions
732:-- they're so detailed that they verge on copyvio. 699:make me figure it's within their scope (and ignore 133:do a fine job as is summarizing the storyline- per 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 900:. A summary this detailed is not appropriate, and 822:anything remotely useful to the main article, and 1390:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 1195:of what he feels is relevant info, though. 862:. Too detailed to even count as summary. -- 1358:long. The storyline articles above cover 1252:. Not remotely notable! No refs at all. 715:Note: This debate has been added to the 519:: This debate has been included in the 1155:. Redirect "StarCraft storyline" to 7: 1272:argument isn't a bad one. Note that 24: 904:'s plot summary is sufficient. - 668:, and consider emptying much of 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 1147:. Redirect episodes 1-3 to 1003:. No transwiki is required. 1001:Wikia with similar articles 772:- Story summary already in 1407: 1350:23:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1334:14:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1317:12:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1286:11:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1257:07:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1245:04:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1200:15:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 1176:05:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1164:17:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1120:17:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1111:12:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1102:06:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1080:05:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1051:05:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1040:05:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1016:17:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 990:16:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 966:02:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 957:13:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 925:22:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 889:21:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 875:05:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 855:17:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 843:15:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 811:12:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 791:05:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 782:game and its expansion. -- 765:05:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 737:04:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 724:04:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 708:04:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 683:04:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 643:05:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 626:00:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 616:23:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 606:20:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 589:18:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 579:18:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 569:05:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 555:02:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 545:02:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 531:06:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 511:02:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 1371:05:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 57:07:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1383:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 1314:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 1221:Move to StarCraft wiki 1197:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 1145:Brood War introduction 975:transwiki to Wikibooks 465:Brood War introduction 1312:, as proposed above? 996:Apparently there's a 717:list of CVG deletions 235:StarCraft Episode III 1153:StarCraft: Brood War 1151:and episodes 4-6 to 1141:StarCraft: Enslavers 1137:Redirect 7, delete 2 850:per Bibliomaniac15. 599:Starcraft: Brood War 419:StarCraft: Enslavers 373:StarCraft Episode VI 281:StarCraft Episode IV 189:StarCraft Episode II 131:Starcraft: Brood War 1303:m:Wiki is not paper 1266:m:Wiki is not paper 1033:StarCraft storyline 1029:StarCraft storyline 978:would be more ideal 327:StarCraft Episode V 143:StarCraft Episode I 71:StarCraft storyline 63:StarCraft storyline 1157:StarCraft universe 818:to a gaming wiki, 1078: 923: 867: 533: 524: 1398: 1385: 1367: 1330: 1243: 1240: 1234: 1228: 1068: 1066: 954: 949: 944: 939: 936: 930:Keep But Cleanup 913: 911: 865: 839: 837: 835: 803: 787: 760: 755: 750: 726: 677: 671: 640:FrozenPurpleCube 613:FrozenPurpleCube 586:FrozenPurpleCube 566:FrozenPurpleCube 542:FrozenPurpleCube 525: 515: 506: 488: 460: 442: 414: 396: 368: 350: 322: 304: 276: 258: 230: 212: 184: 166: 112: 94: 34: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1388:deletion review 1381: 1366:Scottie_theNerd 1365: 1329:Scottie_theNerd 1328: 1268:, although the 1242: 1238: 1232: 1226: 1224: 1062: 1005:Delete or merge 952: 947: 942: 937: 934: 907: 833: 831: 829: 802:Scottie_theNerd 801: 786:Scottie_theNerd 785: 758: 753: 748: 714: 675: 669: 479: 463: 433: 417: 387: 371: 341: 325: 295: 279: 249: 233: 203: 187: 157: 141: 85: 69: 66: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1404: 1402: 1393: 1392: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1319: 1289: 1288: 1259: 1247: 1230: 1202: 1178: 1166: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1086:StarCraft#Plot 1021: 1020: 1019: 970: 969: 968: 927: 891: 878: 877: 857: 845: 813: 793: 767: 739: 727: 712: 711: 710: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 550:sufficient. -- 534: 513: 461: 415: 369: 323: 277: 231: 185: 119: 118: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1403: 1391: 1389: 1384: 1378: 1377: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1335: 1332: 1331: 1324: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1311: 1309: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1241: 1235: 1229: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1065: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1011: 1006: 1002: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 991: 988: 987: 985: 979: 976: 971: 967: 964: 960: 959: 958: 955: 950: 945: 940: 931: 928: 926: 921: 917: 912: 910: 903: 899: 895: 892: 890: 887: 883: 880: 879: 876: 872: 868: 861: 858: 856: 853: 849: 846: 844: 841: 840: 825: 821: 817: 814: 812: 809: 805: 804: 797: 794: 792: 789: 788: 781: 777: 776: 771: 768: 766: 763: 762: 761: 756: 751: 743: 740: 738: 735: 731: 728: 725: 722: 718: 713: 709: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 685: 684: 681: 674: 667: 663: 659: 655: 652: 644: 641: 637: 627: 624: 619: 618: 617: 614: 609: 608: 607: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 587: 582: 581: 580: 577: 572: 571: 570: 567: 563: 558: 557: 556: 553: 548: 547: 546: 543: 538: 535: 532: 529: 522: 518: 514: 512: 509: 504: 500: 496: 492: 487: 483: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 441: 437: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 395: 391: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 349: 345: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 303: 299: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 257: 253: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 211: 207: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 165: 161: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 139: 138: 136: 132: 128: 124: 116: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1382: 1379: 1364: 1359: 1355: 1342: 1327: 1322: 1307: 1294: 1261: 1249: 1220: 1204: 1192: 1189:Black Falcon 1180: 1168: 1161:Black Falcon 1136: 1117:Black Falcon 1099:Black Falcon 1093: 1089: 1063: 1048:Black Falcon 1037:Black Falcon 1024: 1023: 1008: 1004: 998: 982: 974: 972: 929: 908: 898:novelization 897: 893: 881: 859: 847: 827: 823: 819: 815: 800: 795: 784: 779: 773: 769: 749:bibliomaniac 746: 745: 741: 729: 692: 657: 653: 536: 528:Black Falcon 516: 120: 45: 43: 31: 28: 1299:Goobergunch 1279:Goobergunch 886:Wickethewok 826:the rest. — 691:). I'm not 1354:The story 1139:. Delete 1090:supplement 866:ヴィルヴェルヴィント 864:Wirbelwind 1323:StarCraft 1308:StarCraft 1297:- to me, 1227:Mitaphane 1185:WP:NOT #7 1173:Everyking 1149:StarCraft 1061:A Man In 1057:StarCraft 1027:all into 999:StarCraft 906:A Man In 902:StarCraft 852:Acalamari 816:Transwiki 775:StarCraft 673:StarCraft 658:transwiki 595:Starcraft 135:WP:NOT #7 127:Starcraft 123:Starcraft 1347:MrMacMan 1075:past ops 1071:conspire 920:past ops 916:conspire 808:Scienter 656:, maybe 562:see here 115:View log 1295:comment 1217:fiction 1191:does a 953:veritas 935:Captain 734:Novalis 689:planets 666:WP:FICT 482:protect 477:history 436:protect 431:history 390:protect 385:history 344:protect 339:history 298:protect 293:history 252:protect 247:history 206:protect 201:history 160:protect 155:history 88:protect 83:history 54:Shimeru 1274:WP:NOT 1254:NBeale 1250:Delete 1213:pieces 1209:WP:NOT 1205:Delete 1181:delete 1108:Wafulz 963:Wafulz 894:Delete 882:Delete 860:Delete 824:delete 820:smerge 796:Delete 780:single 770:Delete 730:Delete 721:Nifboy 705:Nifboy 680:Nifboy 662:WP:WAF 654:Delete 623:Wafulz 603:Wafulz 576:Wafulz 552:Wafulz 508:Wafulz 486:delete 440:delete 394:delete 348:delete 302:delete 256:delete 210:delete 164:delete 92:delete 50:WP:WAF 46:Delete 1356:isn't 1310:Wikia 1193:merge 1064:Bl♟ck 1025:Merge 938:panda 909:Bl♟ck 848:Merge 742:Merge 693:quite 537:Merge 503:views 495:watch 491:links 457:views 449:watch 445:links 411:views 403:watch 399:links 365:views 357:watch 353:links 319:views 311:watch 307:links 273:views 265:watch 261:links 227:views 219:watch 215:links 181:views 173:watch 169:links 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 1343:Keep 1270:WP:V 1262:Keep 1207:per 1169:Keep 1007:. ╫ 948:vino 871:talk 798:per 701:this 697:this 597:and 517:Note 499:logs 473:talk 469:edit 453:logs 427:talk 423:edit 407:logs 381:talk 377:edit 361:logs 335:talk 331:edit 315:logs 289:talk 285:edit 269:logs 243:talk 239:edit 223:logs 197:talk 193:edit 177:logs 151:talk 147:edit 129:and 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 1360:two 1215:of 1094:can 838:ari 836:hik 526:-- 523:. 113:– ( 1277:-- 1264:. 1183:- 1073:| 1010:25 984:25 943:In 918:| 873:) 834:•S 832:rk 830:Da 806:. 719:. 676:}} 670:{{ 664:, 621:-- 574:-- 501:| 497:| 493:| 489:| 484:| 480:| 475:| 471:| 455:| 451:| 447:| 443:| 438:| 434:| 429:| 425:| 409:| 405:| 401:| 397:| 392:| 388:| 383:| 379:| 363:| 359:| 355:| 351:| 346:| 342:| 337:| 333:| 317:| 313:| 309:| 305:| 300:| 296:| 291:| 287:| 271:| 267:| 263:| 259:| 254:| 250:| 245:| 241:| 225:| 221:| 217:| 213:| 208:| 204:| 199:| 195:| 179:| 175:| 171:| 167:| 162:| 158:| 153:| 149:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 1283:? 1281:| 1239:! 1236:| 1233:? 1077:) 1069:( 1018:╫ 992:╫ 922:) 914:( 869:( 759:5 754:1 505:) 467:( 459:) 421:( 413:) 375:( 367:) 329:( 321:) 283:( 275:) 237:( 229:) 191:( 183:) 145:( 117:) 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:WAF
Shimeru
07:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
StarCraft storyline
StarCraft storyline
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Starcraft
Starcraft
Starcraft: Brood War
WP:NOT #7
StarCraft Episode I
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.