231:
accounts of what may or may not be the blimp. Even the SR-91 page has some technical detail to devolve to readers, and that info is for a plane that has never seen the light of day insofar as the government is concerned. Try harder to find technical info and we will in good faith reconsider our positions.
339:
I understand what you are saying but this particular wiki entry has really been the "tentpole" of
Stealth Blimp info on the internet. A google search for "Stealth Blimp" has this wiki entry at #1. Once its deleted, this information gets relegated back to "fringe" status and conspiracy theory sites.
245:
You guys could certainly help in the search for technical info. With it being a black program and all the pickings will be mighty slim. Additionally I feel the sightings show a statistically relevant pattern that points to the existence of this platform. When many people including pilots and police
127:
Last week I filed an AFD for the article Atlas Carver, one of two articles I deemed suspicious during a routine pass through our black project pages. This is the other article I deemed suspicious; it seems to be composed almost entirely of eye witness citing, with no real background or development
230:
We permit pages on black project, and we do understand that the pages - do to subject matter - will have less than admirable sourcing. That was not my contention in proposing this deletion though; my contention is that one line discusses the stealth blimp and the rest of the article is eyewitness
215:
There really isn't another neutral source for "stealth blimp" information on the web. Google it and take a look. You are basically saying that there can be no wiki pages on "black projects" because they are classified. Its a catch-22 gentleman. If there is something specific you feel the article
246:
officers describe the same huge object repeatedly, it is not just a coincidence. These sightings are much more relevant than any other black program sightings. There have literally been hundreds more, but only the most publicized are referenced here.
324:
information. As Tom points out, there is barely a sentence on the supposed blimp in this article. The rest are perfectly summed up by
Eyeserene. This doesn't meet any of our core content policies and I don't think it can in the foreseeable future.
199:
per above comments; the entire article seems to be speculative OR built around linking some reports of uncertain provenance to a single source that may or may not be connected.
120:
128:
information present for an NPOV take on project. I am of the mind that this whole article may be in open violation of WP:CRYSTAL, hence the afd nom.
17:
87:
82:
91:
74:
391:
36:
314:
Additionally I feel the sightings show a statistically relevant pattern that points to the existence of this platform.
367:
problems with this article. Until reliable sources can be found for anything related to the topic, it needs to go.
182:
isn't met by the current collection of sources, most of which don't appear to actually be about 'stealth blimps'
167:
162:
I only skimmed it, but the article seemed to discuss flying wings. I wanted to learn more about stealth blimps.
390:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
345:
251:
221:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
376:
349:
334:
304:
279:
255:
240:
225:
205:
191:
171:
154:
137:
56:
341:
247:
217:
78:
163:
372:
236:
150:
133:
70:
62:
300:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
187:
364:
264:
330:
360:
317:
268:
320:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a place to draw statistical conclusions, it is a place to list
368:
292:
272:
232:
200:
146:
129:
321:
179:
296:
49:
108:
271:. There are sites and blogs for investigative journalism, but this is not one.
183:
326:
384:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
216:
needs, then work with me on it and I'll get it up to spec.
267:
Our policies and guidelines prohibit articles that lack
115:
104:
100:
96:
265:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a publisher of first instance.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
394:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
269:reliable, third-party, published sources
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
291:agree with the assessment above by
263:I understand your frustration, but
24:
340:This is a real shame gentlemen.
1:
411:
377:12:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
350:03:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
335:22:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
305:22:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
280:23:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
256:18:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
241:17:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
226:16:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
206:09:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
192:07:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
172:06:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
155:03:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
138:03:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
57:00:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
387:Please do not modify it.
316:That is pure and simple
312:Quoting Hyper formance:
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
363:and specifically
318:original research
402:
389:
276:
203:
118:
112:
94:
54:
34:
410:
409:
405:
404:
403:
401:
400:
399:
398:
392:deletion review
385:
274:
201:
164:ChildofMidnight
114:
85:
69:
66:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
408:
406:
397:
396:
380:
379:
354:
353:
352:
342:Hyper formance
307:
293:User:EyeSerene
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
248:Hyper formance
243:
218:Hyper formance
209:
208:
194:
174:
157:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
407:
395:
393:
388:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
281:
278:
277:
270:
266:
262:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
244:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
214:
211:
210:
207:
204:
198:
195:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
156:
152:
148:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:Stealth Blimp
68:
67:
64:
63:Stealth Blimp
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
386:
383:
356:
313:
309:
288:
273:
260:
213:DON'T Delete
212:
196:
176:
159:
143:
126:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
359:- obvious
322:verifiable
275:RGTraynor
369:Parsecboy
233:TomStar81
202:EyeSerene
147:TomStar81
130:TomStar81
121:View log
297:Krelnik
261:Delete:
88:protect
83:history
52:JForget
365:WP:SYN
357:Delete
310:Delete
289:Delete
197:Delete
184:Nick-D
177:Delete
160:Delete
144:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
361:WP:OR
327:Woody
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
373:talk
346:talk
331:talk
301:talk
252:talk
237:Talk
222:talk
188:talk
180:WP:V
168:talk
151:Talk
134:Talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
375:)
348:)
333:)
303:)
295:--
254:)
239:)
224:)
190:)
170:)
153:)
136:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
371:(
344:(
329:(
299:(
250:(
235:(
220:(
186:(
166:(
149:(
132:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.