313:: Agreement with poster and Odie5533. The article certainly shouldn't be marked for speedy delete since it meets the A7 requirement of "existence, not notability", but to keep the article we do still need referenced sources to back that up. Ironically, one of the links listed on the page is "Wiki" and leading to quite literally an off-site Wiki-style information database for the game. I have no idea what category or tag you would give something like that, but simple reasoning would make one wonder why something would need a Knowledge (XXG) article if one of its external links is "Wiki". Alternate dimensions? Though the article is informational and doesn't give a self-promotional vibe, that link is highly suspicious as
471:: GameStar should be a valid source. The linked article, although in Polish is obviously not a press release since it mentioned that the server were offline on launch day). Having an MORGP developed by and on the official webpage of a large city is notably on its own. It is used in a Ph.D. research project, which unfortunately is not completed and therefor not published, yet. --
523:
Whilst I'm not convinced about the significance of coverage from GameStar and Gazeta
Wyborcza (the former being quite short, and the latter being pay-per-view and possibly just coverage of a press release), it's enough to show that there are at least reliable sources, at least enough to have the game
343:
newsletter (but i am not sure if that is more worthy than random blogs and game review sites). And it got some attention because it is used as the base for "Krakow Online" by the city of Krakow to present the city to tourists in an online world. There was some coverage about that in Polish i cannot
410:
The project is hosted on SF.net, except for the Wiki (!), main game server, and irc channel. SF.net is hosting a huge number of open source projects so getting mentioned in their newsletter is not something that happens easily. Anyway the other sources, "Gazeta
Wyborcza" newspaper and GameStar are
357:
twice, deleted the last time therefor a couple of month ago. It was only recently restored because I asked for the wiki text in order to extends the article on
Libregamewiki. In difference to the version that was deleted (which only lists the very high activity rating), there are the two new
358:
references (Krakow and the SF Newsletter). I don't know if that is sufficient to keep it in
Knowledge (XXG) as I try to stay away from AfD. -- I am a contributor to both Stendhal and Knowledge (XXG) (using my real name for this article and discussion to make that obvious) --
494:
of the launch event of the Polish variant "Krakow Online Game" on 15., 16. and 18. December 2006. The electronic version of those articles is pay per view. But I guess the headings are a valid prove that it was mentioned on three succeeding days in that newspaper:
503:
321:
is what I see the list of concerns adding up to be. Even past that, the resources and link are self-promotional or irrelevant. Normally, articles that have existed this long don't reach AfD discussions, but it has apparently been hiding under the radar.
507:
505:
274:
The Wiki-link you critized was only added one and a half year after the article was created. I think it was NPOV when it was created and it is NPOV now mostly. In between there were some announcement style edits that have been removed by now.
149:
180:
As far as I can tell, this game has not received any coverage from reliable publications, so is unlikely to be notable enough for inclusion. In fact, independent verification is an issue too.
143:
377:
The only things in
Knowledge (XXG) directing to this article are a few user pages talking about this very discussion, or the AfD lists. That would help show a lack of further impact.
110:
254:
as a concern since the article reads as though it were self-published by an involved party and needs a neutral point of view written when the other concerns are addressed.
200:
83:
78:
87:
392:
Edited for a chance to clarify; I admit I could have looked rude and I certainly didn't read over my comment very well before saving. I'm sticking with a
221:: This game is regularly updated and the Knowledge (XXG) page links are all active and relevant to the game. There is no reason to remove this article.
70:
509:) -- I am a contributor to both Stendhal and Knowledge (XXG) (using my real name account for this article and discussion to make that obvious) --
164:
374:
Suspicious. Probably a lot easier to get featured on a a website you regularly contribute content to. Sorry, but it's a blatant COI to me.
131:
17:
125:
224:
Well, I gave two reasons to delete it, but I didn't provide links for those not familiar with
Knowledge (XXG). They are the
514:
416:
396:
though... searches for content and news were blank and nothing that could be used as a 'rescue resource' stuck out to me.
363:
121:
553:
533:
518:
480:
451:
420:
405:
387:
367:
331:
305:
284:
263:
241:
212:
189:
52:
568:
36:
171:
74:
229:
567:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
510:
412:
359:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
66:
58:
461:(at this point an online article of GameStar and the newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza have been added as sources)
225:
137:
251:
529:
317:; This article would be little more than a portal to suggest people go to the "real Wiki" for the game.
237:
208:
185:
476:
280:
447:
401:
383:
327:
259:
157:
318:
247:
549:
301:
49:
524:
included on some List articles. I'd like to hear what other people thing about these sources.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
354:
525:
233:
204:
181:
48:. The arguments for deletion seem to prevail over the arguments for retention in this case.
314:
491:
443:
397:
379:
323:
255:
500:
498:
496:
439:
545:
297:
372:"Featured"? Sourceforge is the host of the now-defuct Self-Promoting "Wiki" link.
104:
340:
472:
276:
544:
I don't think there are enough reliable sources to warrant an article. --
561:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
296:: Non-notable, couldn't find any reliable sources out there. --
100:
96:
92:
156:
170:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
571:). No further edits should be made to this page.
201:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
339:: Stendhal was repeatably featured in the
246:Other things I've mentioned refer to how
199:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
248:Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory
24:
353:The article was appointed for
1:
490:: There was some coverage in
344:find as I don't speak Polish.
554:02:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
534:10:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
519:07:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
481:15:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
452:21:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
421:00:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
406:22:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
388:22:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
368:22:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
332:20:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
306:12:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
285:15:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
264:23:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
242:22:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
213:11:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
190:11:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
53:15:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
588:
564:Please do not modify it.
411:more reliable anyway. --
67:Stendhal (computer game)
59:Stendhal (computer game)
32:Please do not modify it.
442:for this video game.
440:significant coverage
511:Hendrik Brummermann
502:(Google Translate:
413:Hendrik Brummermann
360:Hendrik Brummermann
228:guidelines and the
44:The result was
215:
579:
566:
230:WP:Verifiability
195:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
575:
569:deletion review
562:
492:Gazeta Wyborcza
438:: I can't find
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
585:
583:
574:
573:
558:
557:
556:
539:
538:
537:
536:
484:
483:
464:
459:
457:
455:
454:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
348:
347:
346:
345:
308:
290:
289:
288:
287:
269:
268:
267:
266:
244:
216:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
572:
570:
565:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
542:
541:
540:
535:
531:
527:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
506:
504:
501:
499:
497:
493:
489:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
466:
465:
462:
458:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
433:
422:
418:
414:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
378:
375:
371:
370:
369:
365:
361:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
342:
338:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
320:
316:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
291:
286:
282:
278:
273:
272:
271:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:WP:Notability
223:
222:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
563:
560:
487:
468:
463:
460:
456:
435:
393:
376:
373:
336:
310:
293:
252:WP:PROMOTION
218:
196:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
526:Marasmusine
341:SourceForge
234:Marasmusine
205:Marasmusine
182:Marasmusine
144:free images
444:Joe Chill
398:Datheisen
380:Datheisen
324:Datheisen
319:WP:NOTDIR
256:Datheisen
546:Odie5533
298:Odie5533
232:policy.
111:View log
50:MuZemike
488:Comment
355:WP:PROD
337:Comment
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
436:Delete
394:Delete
315:WP:COI
311:Delete
294:Delete
250:, and
122:Google
88:delete
46:delete
473:Gamfa
277:Gamfa
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
550:talk
530:talk
515:talk
477:talk
469:Keep
448:talk
417:talk
402:talk
384:talk
364:talk
328:talk
302:talk
281:talk
260:talk
238:talk
219:Keep
209:talk
197:Note
186:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
172:TWL
109:– (
552:)
532:)
517:)
479:)
450:)
419:)
404:)
386:)
366:)
330:)
304:)
283:)
275:--
262:)
240:)
211:)
203:.
188:)
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
548:(
528:(
513:(
475:(
446:(
415:(
400:(
382:(
362:(
326:(
300:(
279:(
258:(
236:(
207:(
184:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.