415:
Just to be clear, the fact that the election writ hasn't been dropped yet doesn't mean the parties aren't already selecting their candidates, and one of the primary sources here plainly verifies that she's been selected as a candidate. I was merely responding to the notion that her "popularity" as a
375:
pass in and of itself for a candidate who wasn't already notable for other reasons — but its lack of existence as of today isn't evidence of a candidate's popularity or lack thereof, because the campaign kickoff is still a couple of months away.
335:
the election, not just run in it, to become notable as politicians. Obviously the article can be recreated on or after election day if she wins, but nothing stated or sourced here entitles her to already have an article today.
166:
249:
266:
397:
being a candidate is not grounds for notability. If what
Bearcat says is true "the election campaign hasn't started yet", it is not even clear she will actually be a candidate.
119:
323:. As usual, people do not get Knowledge (XXG) articles just for being candidates in elections they haven't won yet: if you cannot demonstrate and properly source that they
160:
283:
300:
371:
The election campaign hasn't started yet. Coverage of candidates will obviously start occurring once the writ gets dropped, and still won't constitute a
126:
227:. Her other positions are not notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. If she wins her election then we can revisit the issue, but for now
92:
87:
96:
208:
79:
17:
416:
candidate was relevant to whether this should be kept or deleted — being a candidate is not in and of itself grounds for an article
181:
148:
420:
of "popularity" or lack thereof, but it's not a question of her status as a candidate being an unverifiable assumption.
450:
40:
142:
402:
429:
406:
385:
362:
345:
312:
292:
275:
258:
240:
214:
61:
138:
308:
83:
224:
202:
188:
446:
358:
36:
75:
67:
398:
228:
287:
270:
253:
174:
304:
236:
154:
425:
381:
341:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
445:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
354:
57:
372:
232:
421:
377:
337:
113:
53:
353:. Zero mentions at Google News. Must be an unpopular candidate. --
439:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
223:
As of yet the article subject is a candidate, and thus fails
109:
105:
101:
173:
327:
cleared a notability standard for some other reason
250:
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
453:). No further edits should be made to this page.
299:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
267:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
265:Note: This discussion has been included in the
248:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
284:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
301:list of Women-related deletion discussions
298:
281:
264:
247:
331:they were candidates, then they have to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
197:A non-notable political candidate.
24:
1:
470:
430:18:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
407:02:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
386:20:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
363:20:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
346:18:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
313:12:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
293:14:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
276:14:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
259:14:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
241:03:13, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
215:03:10, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
62:07:29, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
442:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
399:John Pack Lambert
315:
295:
278:
261:
76:Stephanie Maghnam
68:Stephanie Maghnam
461:
444:
290:
273:
256:
211:
205:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
469:
468:
464:
463:
462:
460:
459:
458:
457:
451:deletion review
440:
288:
271:
254:
209:
203:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
467:
465:
456:
455:
435:
434:
433:
432:
410:
409:
391:
390:
389:
388:
366:
365:
348:
317:
316:
296:
279:
262:
244:
243:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
466:
454:
452:
448:
443:
437:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
387:
383:
379:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
347:
343:
339:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:Coolabahapple
302:
297:
294:
291:
285:
280:
277:
274:
268:
263:
260:
257:
251:
246:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:WP:POLITICIAN
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
206:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
441:
438:
417:
394:
350:
332:
328:
324:
320:
220:
199:power~enwiki
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
355:Bbarmadillo
161:free images
418:regardless
229:WP:TOOSOON
447:talk page
37:talk page
449:or in a
289:MT Train
272:MT Train
255:MT Train
233:SamHolt6
231:holds.--
120:View log
39:or in a
422:Bearcat
378:Bearcat
338:Bearcat
325:already
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
395:Delete
373:WP:GNG
351:Delete
329:before
321:Delete
221:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
54:Michig
50:Delete
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
426:talk
403:talk
382:talk
359:talk
342:talk
309:talk
237:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
333:win
189:TWL
118:– (
428:)
405:)
384:)
361:)
344:)
311:)
303:.
286:.
269:.
252:.
239:)
213:)
207:,
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
424:(
401:(
380:(
357:(
340:(
307:(
235:(
210:ν
204:π
201:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.