651:, so the former is hardly a shining example of a reason to keep the latter. The reason that the former article wasn't tagged (or AfD'd) was that neither I nor anybody else was particularly aware of it. That is hardly a reason to allow either article to "remain" and clutter up WP with poorly sourced fringe tripe.
220:
Non-notable biography of a NLP practitioner that has significant elements of quackery. Sources are largely self-published and/or hosted on subject's own website, with the exception of one citation of his work in a book on
Adlerian Psychology and a review of Gilligan's book (but for crying out loud if
642:
Well, with respect that's a curious perspective. There are a lot of articles on
Knowledge (XXG) that "remain" for the simple reason that nobody besides the article author has read them, cares about the topic or taken the time and effort to tag the content as dubious or non-notable. Tags are useful
221:
that's the level of notability required, then I deserve a
Knowledge (XXG) entry because I've been cited hundreds of times in books and scientific journals). Other sources, such as NLP Academy are advocate organisations for NLP practitioners and not reliable sources.
627:
What you say might be true, although I have for very many years come to see that tagging is an indictment of
Knowledge (XXG) rather than the article in question. I note you have now added more tags...that article remains...therefore so should this article.
643:
because they point out specific problems to be solved in order to improve WP. If those tags remain, then that's a good indication that the article's problems are not being solved, or are perhaps not soluble. There are even more problems with
383:, so technically it is a second nomination. The previous nomination was thrown out mainly because of over-enthusiasm and my optimistic hope that we could remove several totally rubbish articles on NLP in one fell swoop.
189:
88:
309:
583:, a concept (it would seem) that is sufficiently notable to have its own wikipage. All this sort of stuff should be expunged first....if this cannot be done the implication is that he is notable.
518:
704:
I can't see the evidence in Google
Scholar for mass citation or notable influence. If the individual is notable, especially in this field, then there should be third party references --
376:
344:
82:
604:, seems to be as much a vanity project as the article proposed for deletion. It has been tagged since 2015 for not having sufficient citations beyond Gilligan's two books.
183:
278:
142:
547:
247:
149:
421:
362:
327:
296:
265:
115:
110:
119:
17:
714:
694:
669:
637:
622:
592:
568:
539:
509:
478:
449:
426:
401:
367:
332:
301:
270:
239:
102:
65:
666:
619:
565:
536:
446:
398:
236:
204:
171:
487:
633:
588:
733:
40:
644:
601:
580:
165:
161:
680:
629:
584:
380:
106:
463:- searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage of this particular person by this name to show they meet
729:
211:
36:
648:
98:
71:
657:
610:
556:
527:
437:
389:
227:
197:
579:
His name is spattered throughout
Knowledge (XXG). For instance he is the originator of the term
690:
177:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
343:
Why is this a second nomination when the first one doesn't exist and in fact never existed?
464:
503:
59:
406:
For the sake of convenience, I will create the page but redirect it to that discussion.
652:
605:
551:
522:
432:
384:
222:
468:
705:
686:
136:
498:
54:
347:
has never been started and no log entry is displayed to show it was deleted.
375:
The article was nominated alongside a slew of other NLP articles
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
490:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
310:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
685:
Are there any sources to indicate this person is notable?
519:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
379:, and that AFD discussion is linked to on the article's
132:
128:
124:
89:
Articles for deletion/Stephen
Gilligan (2nd nomination)
345:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Stephen
Gilligan
196:
496:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
210:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:). No further edits should be made to this page.
279:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
548:list of Science-related deletion discussions
546:Note: This debate has been included in the
517:Note: This debate has been included in the
308:Note: This debate has been included in the
277:Note: This debate has been included in the
248:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
246:Note: This debate has been included in the
545:
516:
307:
276:
245:
79:
83:Articles for deletion/Stephen Gilligan
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
78:
24:
1:
645:self-relations psychotherapy
602:self-relations psychotherapy
581:Self-relations psychotherapy
753:
715:05:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
695:13:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
670:12:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
638:12:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
623:12:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
593:08:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
569:07:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
540:07:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
450:11:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
427:10:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
402:10:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
368:08:28, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
333:08:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
302:08:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
271:08:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
240:08:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
66:07:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
725:Please do not modify it.
510:09:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
479:01:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
647:than there are with
681:Bosley John Bosley
630:Bosley John Bosley
585:Bosley John Bosley
713:
571:
542:
512:
431:Awesome, thanks!
425:
422:(Follow my trail)
366:
363:(Follow my trail)
335:
331:
328:(Follow my trail)
304:
300:
297:(Follow my trail)
273:
269:
266:(Follow my trail)
744:
727:
712:
710:
684:
664:
655:
649:Stephen Gilligan
617:
608:
563:
554:
534:
525:
506:
501:
495:
493:
491:
475:
472:
444:
435:
419:
417:
411:
396:
387:
360:
358:
352:
325:
323:
317:
294:
292:
286:
263:
261:
255:
234:
225:
215:
214:
200:
152:
140:
122:
99:Stephen Gilligan
72:Stephen Gilligan
62:
57:
34:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:deletion review
723:
706:
678:
662:
658:
653:
615:
611:
606:
600:The article on
577:Procedural Keep
561:
557:
552:
532:
528:
523:
513:
504:
499:
486:
484:
473:
470:
442:
438:
433:
424:
415:
407:
394:
390:
385:
365:
356:
348:
330:
321:
313:
299:
290:
282:
268:
259:
251:
232:
228:
223:
157:
148:
113:
97:
94:
85:
75:
60:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
750:
748:
739:
738:
718:
717:
699:
698:
697:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
660:
613:
573:
572:
559:
543:
530:
494:
483:
482:
481:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
440:
420:
392:
361:
337:
336:
326:
305:
295:
274:
264:
230:
218:
217:
154:
93:
92:
91:
86:
81:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
737:
735:
731:
726:
720:
719:
716:
711:
709:
703:
700:
696:
692:
688:
682:
677:
671:
668:
665:
663:
656:
650:
646:
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
626:
625:
624:
621:
618:
616:
609:
603:
599:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
575:
574:
570:
567:
564:
562:
555:
549:
544:
541:
538:
535:
533:
526:
520:
515:
514:
511:
508:
507:
502:
492:
489:
480:
477:
476:
466:
462:
459:
451:
448:
445:
443:
436:
430:
429:
428:
423:
418:
410:
405:
404:
403:
400:
397:
395:
388:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
369:
364:
359:
351:
346:
342:
339:
338:
334:
329:
324:
316:
311:
306:
303:
298:
293:
285:
280:
275:
272:
267:
262:
254:
249:
244:
243:
242:
241:
238:
235:
233:
226:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
151:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
90:
87:
84:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
63:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
721:
707:
701:
659:
612:
597:
576:
558:
529:
497:
485:
469:
460:
439:
413:
408:
391:
372:
354:
349:
340:
319:
314:
288:
283:
257:
252:
229:
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
145:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
184:free images
730:talk page
416:Horrorist
381:talk page
357:Horrorist
322:Horrorist
291:Horrorist
260:Horrorist
37:talk page
732:or in a
488:Relisted
143:View log
39:or in a
708:Snowded
687:Alexbrn
598:Comment
341:Comment
190:WP refs
178:scholar
116:protect
111:history
702:Delete
654:Famous
607:Famous
553:Famous
524:Famous
465:WP:GNG
461:Delete
434:Famous
412:, the
386:Famous
353:, the
318:, the
287:, the
256:, the
224:Famous
162:Google
120:delete
50:delete
373:Reply
205:JSTOR
166:books
150:Stats
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
691:talk
634:talk
589:talk
474:5969
471:Onel
414:Mad
409:Zeke
377:here
355:Mad
350:Zeke
320:Mad
315:Zeke
289:Mad
284:Zeke
258:Mad
253:Zeke
198:FENS
172:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
667:(c)
661:dog
620:(c)
614:dog
566:(c)
560:dog
537:(c)
531:dog
505:Why
447:(c)
441:dog
399:(c)
393:dog
237:(c)
231:dog
212:TWL
141:– (
61:Why
52:.
693:)
636:)
591:)
550:.
521:.
500:So
467:.
312:.
281:.
250:.
192:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
56:So
689:(
683::
679:@
632:(
587:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
146:·
139:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.