Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Stephen M. Smith - Knowledge

Source 📝

306:. From the entry, we know Mr. Smith's nickname, profession, employer, education, place of residence, teaching style, major ailment, and the name of the non-profit fund concerning said ailment he started, none of which are notable enough to warrant inclusion in this project. Also, as mentioned, the alleged 'significant press coverage' has not been demonstrated. 174:: per notability rationale on article's talk page. Smith was recognized by significant press coverage. Also recognized as innovative and unique by the Muscular Dystrophy Association. Smith created a significant project, a non-profit as a proposed fundraising model for other ALS patients. The article is cited, verifiable, and written in good faith. 229: 252:, it doesn't even say that he has any kind of specialty, let alone that he's known as any kind of expert in it. So I think for notability we have to rely on the more general criteria in 117: 248:. One article in the local newspaper is not "significant press coverage", and I agree with previous commenters that notability has not been shown. In terms of 128:: Non-notable professor and fund raiser. This was originally speedied by me but was reposted in a slightly improved form. There are claims made at 90: 85: 94: 77: 144:
which are all red links. I received a note about this article being involved in some wider dispute but I know nothing of that. —
17: 325: 36: 324:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
310: 298: 286: 274: 260: 238: 217: 194: 178: 153: 59: 129: 81: 132:
including significant press coverage but I do not see that coverage. The mda.org reference also mentions
307: 191: 268:
if notability as an activist can be further demonstrated. No claims were made for academic notability.
73: 65: 137: 53: 257: 149: 141: 133: 190:
How's this guy even close to being notable? And this from someone who invokes BLP elesewhere?
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
50: 283: 249: 235: 145: 295: 253: 162: 175: 111: 204: 161:: per nom. This professor has no notability. --18:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 270: 318:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
294:
per David Eppstein. Insufficient assertion of notability.
107: 103: 99: 202:- The article doesn't state why this guy's notable-- 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 230:list of Academics and educators-related deletions 328:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 228:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 256:but there the case is weak too. — 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 345: 311:17:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 299:04:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 287:23:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 275:04:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 261:01:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 60:07:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 239:23:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 218:20:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 195:19:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 179:19:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 154:18:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 321:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 282:, per David Eppstein. 130:Talk:Stephen M. Smith 44:The result was to 233: 48:this article. -- 336: 323: 224: 216: 214: 209: 115: 97: 74:Stephen M. Smith 66:Stephen M. Smith 58: 34: 344: 343: 339: 338: 337: 335: 334: 333: 332: 326:deletion review 319: 210: 205: 203: 138:Raymon Villegas 88: 72: 69: 49: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 342: 340: 331: 330: 314: 313: 308:130.156.29.134 301: 289: 277: 263: 258:David Eppstein 242: 241: 221: 220: 197: 192:151.151.21.105 184: 183: 182: 181: 176:Yakuman (数え役満) 166: 165: 156: 122: 121: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 341: 329: 327: 322: 316: 315: 312: 309: 305: 302: 300: 297: 293: 290: 288: 285: 281: 278: 276: 273: 272: 267: 264: 262: 259: 255: 251: 247: 244: 243: 240: 237: 231: 227: 223: 222: 219: 215: 213: 208: 201: 198: 196: 193: 189: 186: 185: 180: 177: 173: 170: 169: 168: 167: 164: 160: 157: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 124: 123: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 56: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 320: 317: 303: 291: 279: 269: 265: 245: 225: 211: 206: 199: 187: 171: 158: 125: 54: 45: 43: 31: 28: 142:Mark Reiman 134:Mike Buche 284:Guettarda 266:Week keep 236:Pete.Hurd 146:Wknight94 296:Resolute 163:Ksy92003 118:View log 51:Denelson 250:WP:PROF 188:Delete. 91:protect 86:history 304:Delete 292:Delete 280:Delete 254:WP:BIO 246:Delete 200:Delete 159:Delete 140:, and 126:Delete 95:delete 46:delete 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 226:Note 172:Keep 150:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 271:DGG 234:-- 232:. 207:$ U 116:– ( 212:IT 152:) 136:, 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 55:83 148:( 120:) 114:) 76:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Denelson
83
07:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Stephen M. Smith
Stephen M. Smith
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Talk:Stephen M. Smith
Mike Buche
Raymon Villegas
Mark Reiman
Wknight94
talk
18:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Ksy92003
Yakuman (数え役満)
19:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
151.151.21.105
19:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
$ UIT

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑