216:, site in and of itself is not notable, but primary subjects of site are. Weak because this feels like possible over-reaction to end edit warring on pages generated by these sites. Argument could also be made as it could for most radio fan sites that they had on air mentions, constituting distribution independent of the site. But those are very difficult to find verifiable sources on, and most likely only constitute
278:
I think that source constitutes trivial coverage as it only describes that members of the board have given death threats and says nothing about the notability of the board. If death threats lent notability to a message board almost every BB would have an article on wikipedia as they are pretty common
305:
is fairly clear as to what "trivial" means--basically directory content. This article, though minimally substantial, is substantial. A source does not need to state explicitly that an entity is notable--it is the existence of the source which makes the entity notable.
322:
notable, since he received the death threats. I am also wondering what this UPI article could be a source for, outside of "somebody threatened somebody else." I'm not convinced this proves notability, but if it does, it is of little use to the article.
338:
Footnote 5 mentions that trivial coverage includes passing mentions in newspaper articles. That article is not about Stern Fan
Network, it is about death threats, therefore it does not qualify as a source. Independent coverage does not mean simply being
267:, though filters here at work won't let me view that. There are also many other references, and I'd guess that someone more vested than I in keeping the article could pick through and find the reliable ones.
120:
fansite bulletin board. No outside independent reliable sources given to prove notability. Only links are to its own forum pages. Page full of fancruft for the BB members, contributing nothing of value for an
110:
176:
Unencyclopedic, non notable, and there are no reliable sources for the article and little chance of finding them. Message board posts generally are not
83:
78:
87:
70:
17:
246:
405:
36:
327:
184:
260:
209:
404:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
390:
364:
330:
310:
296:
271:
251:
224:
187:
168:
142:
52:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
324:
205:
181:
74:
201:
319:
387:
383:
361:
293:
165:
139:
66:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
242:
302:
217:
213:
197:
49:
177:
221:
350:
307:
282:
268:
154:
128:
104:
386:, but only in passing. Not enough independent coverage to establish notability.
379:
233:
200:
in not having any citations aside from threads on the site itself. Redirect to (
263:
which mentions it, as well as many references at what I believe is
398:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
264:
318:
I am wondering if that also makes the article's subject
279:
due to the ability to remain anonymous on the internet.
100:
96:
92:
180:. Perhaps even more so for this particular forum.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
408:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
425:
391:00:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
365:00:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
331:21:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
311:01:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
297:20:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
272:19:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
252:05:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
225:05:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
188:21:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
169:16:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
143:16:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
53:21:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
210:Howard 100 and Howard 101
151:per my nomination above.
401:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
259:--there is a reliable
382:mentions the website
232:: Per above and nom.
202:The Howard Stern Show
265:the official website
206:Super Fan Roundtable
301:The definition of
343:, it means being
250:
67:Stern Fan Network
59:Stern Fan Network
416:
403:
363:
359:
356:
353:
303:trivial coverage
295:
291:
288:
285:
240:
237:
218:trivial coverage
167:
163:
160:
157:
141:
137:
134:
131:
108:
90:
34:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
414:
413:
412:
406:deletion review
399:
357:
354:
351:
348:
289:
286:
283:
280:
235:
161:
158:
155:
152:
135:
132:
129:
126:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
422:
420:
411:
410:
394:
393:
388:UnfriendlyFire
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
333:
320:Chaunce Hayden
275:
274:
254:
227:
214:WP:WEB#_note-1
190:
171:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
421:
409:
407:
402:
396:
395:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
373:
366:
362:
360:
346:
345:written about
342:
337:
334:
332:
329:
326:
321:
317:
314:
313:
312:
309:
304:
300:
299:
298:
294:
292:
277:
276:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
253:
248:
244:
239:
238:
231:
228:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
172:
170:
166:
164:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
138:
124:
119:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
400:
397:
375:
344:
340:
335:
315:
256:
234:
229:
193:
173:
148:
123:encyclopedia
122:
117:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
380:Toronto Sun
261:UPI article
118:Non-notable
50:fishhead64
341:mentioned
325:El hombre
222:Optigan13
182:El hombre
336:Response
308:Matchups
269:Matchups
247:contribs
196:- Fails
111:View log
328:de haha
316:Comment
185:de haha
84:protect
79:history
378:- The
376:Delete
236:Seicer
230:Delete
212:) per
198:WP:WEB
194:Delete
174:Delete
149:Delete
88:delete
46:delete
192:Weak
178:WP:RS
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
384:here
358:ecir
290:ecir
257:Keep
243:talk
162:ecir
136:ecir
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
355:cat
287:cat
245:) (
208:or
159:cat
133:cat
109:– (
347:.
220:-
204:,
125:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
352:O
349:—
284:O
281:—
249:)
241:(
156:O
153:—
130:O
127:—
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.