Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Stoozing - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

347:
An article is only unverifiable if you don't find any, having looked. Moreover, having multiple editors doing so is the safeguard that is intended to be incorporated into the AFD process. You don't help to improve the encyclopaedia by not doing the research at AFD and instead simply parroting the
366:: My bad. I admit that i didn't bother looking for sources, because the whole outset looked like a blatant neologism - a silly-sounding nickname from a community website that became an investment strategy. However, the sources that you offered look convincing enough to me. -- 115: 288:
Multiple people independent of its inventor have documented this activity in depth, as a mere 1 minute's looking at the results of a Google search reveals. (
232: 174:. The complete lack of references (even from the purported birthplace forums) is a good indication of non-notability, and it reads like an essay. 401:
per RMHED, and Uncle G. I've worked on the article and can confirm the term is more widely used... but I don't have any statistics, so...
266:
But, equally, a "per nom" argument that has clearly had zero effort put into it to double check it independently, which is what you are
17: 415:
eep. Clearly a fairly new phenomenon for which no other non-neologistic term exists. Well documented usage in the public domain.
258: 220: 332: 291: 336: 88: 83: 440: 328: 36: 92: 320:'s argument is based upon not looking for actual sources that document the subject, so it seems are the arguments of 75: 439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
303: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
385: 380:
Would that they had been added to the article in lieu of being presented here in the form of a lecture.
231:
article may be unsourced but stoozing is certainly a widely recognized term, it gets over 238,000 ghits
180: 425: 407: 389: 375: 357: 279: 261: 255: 243: 223: 217: 205: 184: 164: 160: 142: 57: 420: 403: 341:
Unverifiability means that no sources exist, not that no sources are cited. You are supposed to
53: 371: 353: 275: 195: 138: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
381: 176: 152: 126: 122: 239: 252: 214: 156: 130: 416: 308: 79: 49: 367: 349: 271: 134: 109: 317: 235: 296: 71: 63: 433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
348:
nominator. Neither are you being of any help at all to AFD.
105: 101: 97: 292:"How 'stoozing' could bring down the global economy" 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 251:google hits don't equal notability. --Malevious 443:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 333:Knowledge (XXG):Guide to deletion#Nomination 312:. Telegraph Media Group Limited. 2004-09-11. 304:""You can avoid paying interest altogether"" 151:, non-notable neologism as described in 48:per sources identified in this debate. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 327:I encourage all editors to read 329:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy 322:all of the other editors above 1: 426:21:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 408:18:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 390:14:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 376:12:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 358:02:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 337:User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage 280:02:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 270:, does not have any weight. 262:02:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 244:00:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 224:16:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 206:15:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 185:13:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 165:10:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 143:09:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 343:look for sources yourselves 58:11:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 460: 290:John Stepek (2006-02-27). 436:Please do not modify it. 314:) The PNC is satisfied. 32:Please do not modify it. 213:per nom. --Malevious 268:supposed to be doing 364:Nominator's comment 300:. Digital Look Ltd. 423: 123:Original research 451: 438: 421: 406: 382:Chris Cunningham 313: 301: 202: 199: 177:Chris Cunningham 113: 95: 34: 459: 458: 454: 453: 452: 450: 449: 448: 447: 441:deletion review 434: 402: 368:Amir E. Aharoni 302: 289: 200: 197: 175: 135:Amir E. Aharoni 86: 70: 67: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 457: 455: 446: 445: 429: 428: 410: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 226: 208: 194:as per nom. — 189: 188: 187: 170: 120: 119: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 456: 444: 442: 437: 431: 430: 427: 424: 418: 414: 411: 409: 405: 400: 397: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 377: 373: 369: 365: 362: 361: 360: 359: 355: 351: 346: 344: 338: 334: 330: 325: 323: 319: 311: 310: 309:The Telegraph 305: 299: 298: 293: 287: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264: 263: 260: 259:Contributions 257: 254: 250: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 233: 230: 227: 225: 222: 221:Contributions 219: 216: 212: 209: 207: 204: 203: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 173: 169: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 147: 146: 145: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 435: 432: 412: 398: 363: 342: 340: 326: 321: 315: 307: 295: 267: 248: 228: 210: 196: 191: 171: 148: 131:unreferenced 121: 45: 43: 31: 28: 256:•Talk Page• 218:•Talk Page• 324:, as well. 316:Although 297:MoneyWeek 157:Lankiveil 127:neologism 253:Userpage 215:Userpage 116:View log 72:Stoozing 64:Stoozing 50:Davewild 350:Uncle G 272:Uncle G 249:Comment 201:Annyong 89:protect 84:history 335:, and 211:Delete 192:Delete 172:Delete 153:WP:NEO 149:Delete 93:delete 318:RMHED 236:RMHED 198:Hello 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 422:T@lk 404:-xC- 399:Keep 386:talk 372:talk 354:talk 276:talk 240:talk 229:Keep 181:talk 161:talk 139:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 46:Keep 417:JFW 339:. 155:. 114:– ( 419:| 388:) 374:) 356:) 331:, 306:. 294:. 278:) 242:) 234:. 183:) 167:. 163:) 141:) 133:. 129:, 125:, 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 413:K 384:( 370:( 352:( 345:. 274:( 238:( 179:( 159:( 137:( 118:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Davewild
talk
11:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Stoozing
Stoozing
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Original research
neologism
unreferenced
Amir E. Aharoni
talk
09:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
WP:NEO
Lankiveil
talk
10:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Chris Cunningham
talk
13:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.