121:
225:. But I'm not sure about notability of first award and wasn't able to confirm the second listing. If someone can sort out these two cases, I'm willing to consider vote change.
156:
216:
17:
183:
302:
36:
88:
83:
92:
201:
301:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
75:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
53:
189:
253:
141:
287:
257:
233:
205:
171:
145:
57:
283:
223:
273:
227:
167:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
129:
249:
137:
219:
is through press releases. There is indication that the company has some achievements
133:
279:
197:
163:
79:
109:
49:
272:
turned up, and am skeptical about the neutrality of the two sources found by
243:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
269:
193:
71:
63:
220:
295:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
182:. If it stays, here's some coverage to make it less peacocky:
268:. I could not find evidence of notability other than the one
116:
105:
101:
97:
248:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:). No further edits should be made to this page.
157:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
155:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
288:03:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
258:00:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
234:16:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
206:19:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
172:18:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
146:03:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
58:09:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
322:
298:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
260:
217:Majority coverage
209:
192:comment added by
174:
160:
313:
300:
276:
247:
245:
230:
208:
186:
161:
151:
119:
113:
95:
34:
321:
320:
316:
315:
314:
312:
311:
310:
309:
303:deletion review
296:
274:
241:
228:
187:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
319:
317:
308:
307:
291:
290:
262:
261:
246:
238:
237:
236:
210:
176:
175:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
318:
306:
304:
299:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
271:
267:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
244:
240:
239:
235:
232:
231:
224:
221:
218:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
184:
181:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
158:
154:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
297:
294:
265:
242:
226:
212:
179:
152:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
250:Ron Ritzman
213:Weak delete
188:—Preceding
180:Weak delete
138:Vegaswikian
164:• Gene93k
280:Aymatth2
202:contribs
190:unsigned
122:View log
275:Sleaves
229:Sleaves
130:WP:CORP
89:protect
84:history
72:Stratix
64:Stratix
266:Delete
128:Fails
117:delete
93:delete
50:Stifle
46:delete
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
284:talk
254:talk
198:talk
168:talk
153:Note
142:talk
134:WP:N
132:and
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
270:THF
194:THF
162:--
159:.
286:)
278:.
256:)
222:,
215:.
204:)
200:•
170:)
144:)
136:.
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
282:(
252:(
196:(
185:.
166:(
140:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.