536:: These additions are (1) a brief entry in "The Encyclopedia of Pennsylvania Biography" for her father which mentions her name as one of his daughters; (2) a reference to a book by Roger Moss but no page citation because the quote apparently does not come from the book and is only meant to identify Ross as a notable person (based on the fact that the book does not come up as a result on Google Books when her name is searched with and without middle name but does come once, in a book by Frank Welsh, probably in the dedication - also, as would seem obvious, she is not one of the persons profiled in the book: see
579:
reliability of the piece. I did consider whether the entry could be reduced down to solely its verifiable claims, but the article would then consist of a list of her family members, one quote from one customer, and her gravesite. That is not even close to the "significant coverage" GNG requires. ETA: I'm seeing
Montanabw's comment about the four hits on newspapers.com but since we don't even have headlines or know what the sources even are, let alone whether the coverage in them was at all substantive, I think it doesn't change my view.
473:: Knowledge (XXG) is not a memorial site. The argument that she would have been notable except for the sexist time in which she lived (all the way to 1987, by the way) is grasping at straws. Sally Ride, Judith Resnik and others had flown in space, Martha Stewart was an accomplished author and Oprah Winfrey's show was on national TV by the time this lady died - hardly shows she lived her whole life in a sexist era, FWIW. More importantly, this argument does not cure the lack of sourcing and lack of demonstrated notability.
469:. There may be a wealth of sources on the internet but I could not find even one about this person using searches with and without a full middle name and as related to the monogramming. The only references in the article are non-verifiable genealogy sites which are not necessarily reliable references due to lack of sources and are not viewable. Likely only shows family descent and relationships. This appears to be original research. Also,
250:
change in society since then. Contemplating deleting inforamation on a woman who accomplished so much in her life with business, art and family, aside from the medical issues, because it was not notable to the sexist society in which she lived is nothing less that continuing that sexist attitude and ignoring the great strides women have made in society and in business in our lifetime.
684:@Donner60 the book you are referring to in the second part of your comment above is already cited as a proof of the quote held there within. Do you think the book is not reliable or what? Or that the full text of book cannot found online. We can certainly not go by your assumption that there may be something only in the dedication. Please explain. Thanks
55:
Part of the problem may be that this person lived before the days of ubiquitous internet coverage. This is a problem which is sadly being manifested in our inexorable slide towards becoming ModernSocietyAndPopCulturePedia. If somebody is able to find some usable sources, ping me and I'd be happy to
644:
Using search parameters with and without middle name for
Suzanne Welsh: Nothing on Project Muse, nothing on Questia, nothing on Google Books except for mention in a book by Frank Welsh for which there is no preview. Considering the Knowledge (XXG) article on Frank Welsh which indicates that Suzanne
662:
The second quote that was in the article, one editor keeps deleting it's unsourced, is found in the book below about the Hagy Family. It is the source notation with pages 411 to 413 I think but under the sources. I got the book just to prove and show a citation for it . I am on travel with only a
561:
But there is a need for more sources, I got four hits on newspapers.com but can't access them because I don't have an account. I'm not getting much at all on Google newspapers, Suzanne
Sagendorph Welsh or Suzanne Welsh (adding in other terms such as "Pennsylvania" etc...). Looks like a lot of OR
249:
In the 1940', 1950's, and 1960's men dominated business. Women were not to be seen. If
Suzanne Sagendorph Welsh had done today what she did in those decades, she would have been featured in numerous papers magazines and websites, etc. That was a very sexist time and we have witnessed a great
578:
This is a nice essay I hope finds a home somewhere on the web. (Tumblr?) The issue is simply that since the vast majority of the material is unsourced, and no as-yet unmined sources have been identified, Knowledge (XXG) cannot be that home. It would be a misrepresentation to readers about the
52:. I'm calling this a delete with sadness in my heart, because it seems like the kind of topic we should be covering. However, the debate here is pretty clearly a consensus for deletion, especially since those arguing to keep have failed to provide any useful sources.
663:
mobile so I cannot reinsert the removed part with the quote. Once that is done I do intend to move that caution up to an inline citation in article body its self. Anyone could move it back, or we may until I return to my offices.
168:
343:. One of the clearest deletes I've ever seen at AfD. This is quite a large promotional piece of original research with essentially no independent sources. No evidence whatsoever of notability. It might be good to look at
596:
instead as examining this article still found nothing close to the convincing information and simply the article itself overall is questionable enough to delete, as there's certainly not going to be any new information.
719:
should be kept in mind. Unless I see actual evidence of some sources, I think this should be deleted. The AfD is a good place to show this evidence and if this cannot be found, simply delete this article
515:. Although she was obviously not one of the most noted people of her day, the research and additions to the article since it was tagged are sufficient to establish the notability of Welsh.--
229:
320:
162:
300:
540:) and (3) a find-a-grave page which lists her year of birth, date of death and place of burial. The genealogy references, for what they are worth, were already in the article.
121:
280:
94:
89:
128:
98:
81:
711:
Where are the sources to prove that is passes GNG? This is one of the clearest deletes ever. I do not see any independent coverage to pass GNG.
645:
Sagendorph Welsh was his mother, I think we would be correct to assume that Frank Welsh's (world history) book was dedicated to his mother.
470:
364:
This article needs to be kept and fixed not deleted. There are a wealth of sources available about on the internet now. The article passes
537:
183:
150:
17:
623:. I'd like to see better sourcing. Are there any books or magazine articles about her that are not on the shallow end of the web?
266:
144:
434:
729:
697:
676:
654:
632:
615:
588:
570:
549:
524:
506:
482:
451:
425:
397:
377:
356:
332:
312:
292:
270:
241:
221:
63:
748:
40:
352:
237:
140:
85:
190:
610:
77:
69:
254:
725:
693:
672:
584:
373:
348:
233:
744:
421:
36:
413:
156:
538:
http://www.oakknoll.com/pages/books/120345/roger-w-moss/athenaeum-profiles-a-not-for-profit-education
502:
393:
258:
598:
568:
262:
214:
176:
650:
545:
478:
60:
462:
200:
721:
689:
668:
628:
580:
520:
369:
328:
308:
288:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
743:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
712:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
417:
491:
466:
365:
204:
498:
389:
664:
563:
344:
208:
685:
646:
541:
474:
57:
624:
516:
445:
324:
304:
284:
115:
737:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
412:-- there appears to be nothing on this subject in Google books:
490:. Reads like a memorial. Just not enough material to satisfy
437:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
667:
what would be the best way to handle that? I am not sure.
494:. I note that there has been canvassing for this article.
495:
111:
107:
103:
175:
443:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
230:
189:
368:and the subject lady has established notability.
321:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
751:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
56:restore this as a draft for you to work on. --
8:
319:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:Note: This debate has been included in the
279:Note: This debate has been included in the
228:Note: This debate has been included in the
471:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
281:list of People-related deletion discussions
318:
298:
278:
227:
717:Notability requires verifiable evidence
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
497:There are more worthy targets.
562:here, and we can't use that.
1:
768:
388:Speedy? What's the hurry?
730:16:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
698:16:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
677:15:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
655:04:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
633:00:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
616:04:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
589:20:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
571:05:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
550:05:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
525:15:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
507:10:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
483:01:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
452:01:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
426:23:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
398:11:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
64:22:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
740:Please do not modify it.
378:23:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
357:19:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
333:19:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
313:19:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
293:19:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
271:03:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
242:10:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
222:16:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
78:Suzanne Sagendorph Welsh
70:Suzanne Sagendorph Welsh
32:Please do not modify it.
199:Not notable person per
642:Comment: Response.
454:
349:HappyValleyEditor
335:
315:
295:
274:
257:comment added by
244:
234:Shawn in Montreal
759:
742:
613:
608:
566:
448:
442:
440:
438:
273:
251:
220:
217:
211:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
34:
767:
766:
762:
761:
760:
758:
757:
756:
755:
749:deletion review
738:
611:
599:
564:
455:
446:
433:
431:
252:
215:
209:
207:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
765:
763:
754:
753:
733:
732:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
679:
636:
635:
618:
591:
573:
555:
554:
553:
552:
528:
527:
510:
485:
441:
430:
429:
428:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
381:
380:
359:
345:Frank S. Welsh
337:
336:
316:
296:
248:
246:
245:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
764:
752:
750:
746:
741:
735:
734:
731:
727:
723:
718:
715:, which says
714:
710:
707:
706:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
680:
678:
674:
670:
666:
661:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
643:
640:
639:
638:
637:
634:
630:
626:
622:
619:
617:
614:
609:
606:
602:
595:
592:
590:
586:
582:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
560:
557:
556:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
531:
530:
529:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
489:
486:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
456:
453:
450:
449:
439:
436:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
277:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
243:
239:
235:
231:
226:
225:
224:
223:
218:
212:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
53:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
739:
736:
722:Lemongirl942
716:
708:
690:Zpeopleheart
681:
669:Zpeopleheart
659:
641:
620:
604:
600:
593:
581:Innisfree987
575:
558:
533:
512:
487:
458:
444:
432:
409:
370:Zpeopleheart
361:
340:
253:— Preceding
247:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
418:K.e.coffman
362:Speedy Keep
163:free images
499:Xxanthippe
390:Xxanthippe
745:talk page
665:Montanabw
565:Montanabw
559:Weak Keep
259:Bkbeltgal
210:Kharkiv07
37:talk page
747:or in a
686:Donner60
647:Donner60
542:Donner60
475:Donner60
463:WP:BASIC
461:. Fails
435:Relisted
347:as well.
267:contribs
255:unsigned
201:WP:BASIC
122:View log
58:RoySmith
39:or in a
713:WP:NRVE
682:comment
660:comment
625:Bearian
621:Comment
534:Comment
517:Ipigott
447:MBisanz
414:preview
325:Uanfala
305:Uanfala
285:Uanfala
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
709:Delete
607:wister
603:wister
594:Delete
576:Delete
492:WP:GNG
488:Delete
467:WP:GNG
459:Delete
410:Delete
366:WP:GNG
341:Delete
205:WP:GNG
141:Google
99:delete
61:(talk)
50:delete
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
726:talk
694:talk
673:talk
651:talk
629:talk
612:talk
585:talk
546:talk
521:talk
513:Keep
503:talk
479:talk
465:and
422:talk
394:talk
374:talk
353:talk
329:talk
309:talk
289:talk
263:talk
238:talk
203:and
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
688:,
191:TWL
120:– (
728:)
720:--
696:)
675:)
653:)
631:)
587:)
548:)
523:)
505:)
481:)
424:)
416:.
396:)
376:)
355:)
331:)
323:.
311:)
303:.
291:)
283:.
269:)
265:•
240:)
232:.
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
724:(
692:(
671:(
649:(
627:(
605:T
601:S
583:(
544:(
519:(
509:.
501:(
477:(
420:(
400:.
392:(
372:(
351:(
327:(
307:(
287:(
261:(
236:(
219:)
216:T
213:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.