Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sudbury Community Foundation - Knowledge

Source 📝

216:
of bank account that a community foundation needs to possess before it can qualify for an article, so the fact that it has a smaller endowment than the Vancouver Foundation is irrelevant. The issue, as always, is
329:
If this is a matter of having better sources, I will make changes to the page using secondary sources. This is not a problem. I will attempt to do so in the next couple of days.
120: 87: 82: 91: 191: 74: 306:
requesting better sourcing for a while but as it's come here already, I'll go along with the delete suggestion unless significant sources are found.
339: 17: 347: 324: 278: 258: 234: 206: 181: 144: 56: 78: 131:; yes, they're similar, except that the Vancouver Foundation has $ 800M loonies and Sudbury's has $ 1.5M. Notifying 70: 62: 363: 274: 36: 362:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
343: 127:
Tagged for speedy deletion as spam; I'm taking it to AfD because the creator mentioned the similarity to
254: 335: 319: 270: 225:
for the moment, but I will be revising that to a keep if suitable sources can be found before close.
177: 128: 303: 230: 169: 165: 154: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
250: 202: 140: 132: 307: 173: 172:
also in the search, but they only mention it in passing (so not usable for notability).--
295: 299: 287: 330: 226: 157: 50: 108: 291: 198: 161: 136: 290:, which suggests it is less likely to have enough reliable sources to create a 244:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
356:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
212:
For what it's worth, there's absolutely no rule about the
115: 104: 100: 96: 221:, not how many loonies the organization controls. I'm 160:
article about it, which could be enough to establish
249:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 302:article. For such a recent creation, I would have 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 366:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 286:. On the face of it, it appears to not meet 192:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions 186: 190:: This debate has been included in the 269:Does not meet notability guidelines. 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 71:Sudbury Community Foundation 63:Sudbury Community Foundation 383: 348:18:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 325:05:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 279:18:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 259:00:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 235:01:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 207:19:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 182:18:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 145:18:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 57:23:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 359:Please do not modify it. 304:tagged it for notability 32:Please do not modify it. 129:Vancouver Foundation 44:The result was 338:comment added by 323: 261: 209: 195: 374: 361: 350: 317: 315: 312: 248: 246: 196: 118: 112: 94: 53: 34: 382: 381: 377: 376: 375: 373: 372: 371: 370: 364:deletion review 357: 333: 313: 308: 271:ChildofMidnight 242: 114: 85: 69: 66: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 380: 378: 369: 368: 352: 351: 327: 281: 263: 262: 247: 239: 238: 237: 210: 184: 164:. There were 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 379: 367: 365: 360: 354: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 332: 328: 326: 321: 316: 311: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 282: 280: 276: 272: 268: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 245: 241: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 215: 211: 208: 204: 200: 193: 189: 185: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 152: 149: 148: 147: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 358: 355: 340:70.54.184.64 309: 283: 266: 243: 222: 218: 213: 203:push to talk 187: 158:Sudbury Star 150: 141:push to talk 126: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 334:—Preceding 284:Weak delete 251:Ron Ritzman 174:kelapstick 162:notability 197:-- - Dan 133:WP:Canada 336:unsigned 153:I found 135:. - Dan 121:View log 331:ChrisKN 296:WP:NPOV 227:Bearcat 223:neutral 219:sources 151:comment 88:protect 83:history 52:MBisanz 310:Double 300:WP:NOR 288:WP:ORG 267:Delete 199:Dank55 137:Dank55 116:delete 92:delete 46:delete 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 344:talk 320:talk 314:Blue 292:WP:V 275:talk 255:talk 231:talk 214:size 188:Note 178:talk 170:this 168:and 166:this 155:this 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 346:) 298:, 294:, 277:) 257:) 233:) 205:) 194:. 180:) 143:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 342:( 322:) 318:( 273:( 253:( 229:( 201:( 176:( 139:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
MBisanz
23:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Sudbury Community Foundation
Sudbury Community Foundation
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Vancouver Foundation
WP:Canada
Dank55
push to talk
18:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
this
Sudbury Star
notability
this
this
kelapstick
talk
18:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.