Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/SuperAntiSpyware - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

402:. As is, and in any version constructed by Emperordarius, the article crosses the line into spam and I recommend its deletion, at least until someone can rebuild it from a purely objective perspective. I do think the article can be rescued but one might as well delete the present version and start again from scratch. 319:. The nomination in fact suggests that a better version exists in the history of the current article. My understanding is that this is one of the better known free anti-spyware programs; I have used it myself, so it meets the "heard of it before seeing the article" test. 189:
as a clear example of an advertisement. I was preparing to send this to AfD myself, as a PROD tag has already been removed. The author does not appear to be amenable to allowing the article to be more neutral. Besides, its notability itself is in question.
300:
I almost deleted it right away (in fact, I did until I saw that someone else than the obvious program's author was trying a bit to work on the article). I fear, though, that the article is not salvageable. Delete with prejudice. --
143:
Article originally created and speedily deleted as spam, the author recreated it in a more neutral manner but has since been editing it such that as of now just about every sentence but the first is promotional in some way.
136: 515: 233:
The article is not written as an advertisement. It just shows the function of the program, the differences between editions(as many other programs show, such as
103: 98: 481: 450: 433: 385: 358: 256: 107: 90: 269:
it's SPAM although perhaps unintentional. Non-notable and non-verifiable in accordance with the policies and guidelines as well.
177: 17: 496:, current version is certainly acceptable. The deletion nomination wasn't wrong, though, based on the article at the time. 66: 549: 36: 343:
the comparison table between the free and commercial version. What do you think now? Note: I'm not a developer.
548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
533: 505: 485: 460: 437: 411: 389: 362: 332: 307: 295: 278: 260: 226: 204: 181: 157: 72: 501: 477: 446: 429: 407: 381: 354: 252: 94: 528: 209: 86: 78: 469: 456: 421: 373: 346: 274: 244: 241:), and the critical reception. The article is NOT written as an advertisement, and has clear facts. 221: 199: 171: 473: 425: 403: 377: 350: 291: 248: 153: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
522: 328: 60: 270: 214: 192: 167: 49: 399: 302: 287: 238: 149: 124: 497: 324: 54: 234: 370:
UPDATE: Removed parts, added more review links, added more features
320: 542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
398:
Emperordarius, I think it's pretty clear by now that you're
400:
editing this article with a flagrant conflict of interest
131: 120: 116: 112: 418:
I seriously don't understand WHAT you consider spam.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 552:). No further edits should be made to this page. 516:list of Software-related deletion discussions 8: 514:: This debate has been included in the 323:review suggests adequate notability. - 445:Added System requirements and history ( 7: 52:! No assertion of major notability. 24: 466:Complete Redesign of the page 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 73:16:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 534:22:25, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 506:12:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 486:20:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 461:19:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 438:19:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 412:19:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 390:18:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 363:14:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 333:13:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 308:13:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 296:12:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 286:. It reads like advertising. 279:10:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 261:06:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 227:07:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 205:06:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 182:06:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 158:06:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 569: 212:that should head to AfD. 545:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 459:comment was added at 166:as advertisement. 44:The result was 536: 519: 488: 472:comment added by 463: 440: 424:comment added by 392: 376:comment added by 365: 349:comment added by 284:Speedy delete G11 263: 247:comment added by 71: 560: 547: 531: 525: 520: 510: 467: 454: 419: 371: 344: 305: 242: 217: 195: 134: 128: 110: 87:SuperAntiSpyware 79:SuperAntiSpyware 69: 63: 57: 53: 34: 568: 567: 563: 562: 561: 559: 558: 557: 556: 550:deletion review 543: 529: 523: 325:Smerdis of Tlön 303: 215: 193: 130: 101: 85: 82: 67: 61: 55: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 566: 564: 555: 554: 538: 537: 508: 490: 489: 464: 442: 441: 415: 414: 393: 367: 366: 336: 335: 310: 298: 281: 264: 231: 230: 229: 184: 141: 140: 81: 76: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 565: 553: 551: 546: 540: 539: 535: 532: 526: 517: 513: 509: 507: 503: 499: 495: 492: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 474:Emperordarius 471: 465: 462: 458: 452: 448: 444: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 426:Emperordarius 423: 417: 416: 413: 409: 405: 404:Pascal.Tesson 401: 397: 394: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378:Emperordarius 375: 369: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351:Emperordarius 348: 342: 338: 337: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 311: 309: 306: 299: 297: 293: 289: 285: 282: 280: 276: 272: 268: 265: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249:Emperordarius 246: 240: 239:Visual Studio 236: 232: 228: 225: 224: 223: 219: 218: 211: 208: 207: 206: 203: 202: 201: 197: 196: 188: 185: 183: 179: 176: 173: 169: 165: 162: 161: 160: 159: 155: 151: 147: 138: 133: 126: 122: 118: 114: 109: 105: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 83: 80: 77: 75: 74: 70: 64: 58: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 544: 541: 511: 493: 395: 340: 316: 312: 283: 266: 222: 220: 213: 200: 198: 191: 186: 174: 163: 145: 142: 45: 43: 31: 28: 524:Fabrictramp 468:—Preceding 455:—Preceding 420:—Preceding 372:—Preceding 345:—Preceding 243:—Preceding 210:Another one 530:talk to me 271:Jasynnash2 50:Spamtastic 168:Byeitical 148:as spam. 482:contribs 470:unsigned 451:contribs 434:contribs 422:unsigned 386:contribs 374:unsigned 359:contribs 347:unsigned 304:lucasbfr 288:McWomble 257:contribs 245:unsigned 235:Ad-Aware 178:contribs 137:View log 68:contribs 457:undated 341:removed 150:Ros0709 104:protect 99:history 498:Stifle 396:Delete 321:PC Mag 313:Revert 267:Delete 216:Enigma 194:Enigma 187:Delete 164:Delete 146:Delete 132:delete 108:delete 56:seicer 46:delete 135:) – ( 125:views 117:watch 113:links 16:< 512:Note 502:talk 494:Keep 478:talk 447:talk 430:talk 408:talk 382:talk 355:talk 329:talk 317:keep 315:and 292:talk 275:talk 253:talk 172:talk 154:talk 121:logs 95:talk 91:edit 62:talk 521:-- 518:. 453:) 237:or 527:| 504:) 484:) 480:• 449:• 436:) 432:• 410:) 388:) 384:• 361:) 357:• 339:I 331:) 294:) 277:) 259:) 255:• 180:) 156:) 123:| 119:| 115:| 111:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 65:| 59:| 48:. 500:( 476:( 428:( 406:( 380:( 353:( 327:( 290:( 273:( 251:( 175:· 170:( 152:( 139:) 129:( 127:) 89:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Spamtastic
seicer
talk
contribs
16:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
SuperAntiSpyware
SuperAntiSpyware
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Ros0709
talk
06:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Byeitical
talk
contribs
06:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Enigma

06:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑