525:(C.S.T.Entertainment) which has been in operation since 2009. Just spending a little time looking around on the site, if it's just a fan site it is one of the absolute best ones I've ever seen. It seems to be a cross between ANN and Crunchyroll, since they do news, social media, and streaming. I would say it's acceptable as a reliable source. Natalie is definitely acceptable, too. ···
480:
I did try to write a reply earlier but the site was playing up. Natalie is a reliable source, I've seen it cited by Yahoo Japan, and ANN often use it. However the links provided are literally announces about the start and end of the series - nothing we can't source elsewhere. The other site might be
416:
232:
226:
274:
The article was created the week the series debuted and was tagged for notability right after. That was in 2009 and google searches have only discovered user blogs, wiki mirrors/other databases and illegal hosting sites.
169:
441:, since I usually just translate scientific en articles to ja. Cinii is a search engine for formal articles like "Google Scholar" or "Web of Science", and not good for searching reviews on manga, I think.--
408:
247:
214:
617:
state "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." - All we need is the
208:
292:
204:
254:
434:
Some
Japanese web pages mentioned this manga, "Super Dog Rilienthal", in Japanese "賢い犬リリエンタール", although I'm not sure if these pages are regarded as reliable source in enwp/jawp
163:
462:
If you don't mind, please find who publishes otakuma.net and natalie.mu. Do these websites have professional publications with editorial staff and processes? (for example
122:
220:
271:
which is notable, but this doesn't seem to be anywhere near as notable. I would redirect to the author page in a case like this but the author doesn't have a page.
375:
Should I check on the
Japanese Knowledge (XXG)? Since the sources are in Japanese there has to be some "review of manga" magazine or something giving reviews...
129:
639:
Are these just passing mentions or announcements though? To establish notability you have to show notability not just say "refer to the sources". -
95:
90:
503:, which seems to be a very small company and doesn't have own writers. I couldn't find whether these companies have editorial staff or processes.--
99:
82:
417:
ja:プロジェクト‐ノート:漫画#Reliable_sources_for_the_manga_.E8.B3.A2.E3.81.84.E7.8A.AC.E3.83.AA.E3.83.AA.E3.82.A8.E3.83.B3.E3.82.BF.E3.83.BC.E3.83.AB
393:
As is usually the case, the Ja.wiki article has no sources of consequence.This is true of better known works, thats just how ja.wiki is.
17:
184:
481:
usable but it's going to need to be translated the old fashioned if it is usable as RS. The keywords that stick out need context.
151:
330:
533:
586:
345:
671:
40:
145:
648:
630:
601:
577:
550:
512:
490:
475:
450:
427:
402:
384:
365:
336:
304:
284:
64:
141:
644:
573:
86:
486:
398:
300:
280:
191:
409:
ja:Knowledge (XXG):Help_for_Non-Japanese_Speakers#Reliable_sources_for_the_manga_.22Super_Dog_Rilienthal.22
78:
70:
667:
626:
597:
471:
423:
380:
36:
264:
508:
446:
640:
569:
324:
240:
177:
157:
539:
482:
463:
394:
296:
276:
358:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
666:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
622:
522:
467:
419:
376:
614:
565:
504:
457:
442:
621:
and if that exists, even if it may not necessarily be used in the article, it's notable.
543:
318:
55:
526:
435:
268:
355:
267:
but I can't see anything that suggests it's notable by itself. It's author created
116:
316:
499:, which is size of 77 employees and has own writers. Otakuma is published by
496:
439:
437:
412:
660:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
500:
589:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
415:
with the
Japanese title but nothing turns up. Also posted at
348:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
521:
Otakuma seems to be an anime/manga/fandom website run by a
112:
108:
104:
239:
176:
568:? Where would the content for the sources be used? -
564:
The sources are reliable but are they enough to pass
466:
has editor-vetted articles written by staff members)
263:
Manga series that ran for approx 8 months. It ran in
293:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
595:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
253:
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
674:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
291:Note: This debate has been included in the
290:
407:Sadly that's true. Therefore I posted at
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
315:It is listed in MADB for 4 volumes.
24:
52:. Nobody is for "Keep", so...
1:
691:
649:13:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
631:22:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
337:22:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
305:15:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
285:15:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
65:15:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
663:Please do not modify it.
602:00:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
578:00:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
551:05:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
513:12:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
501:C.S.T.Entertainment,Inc.
495:Natalie is published by
491:00:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
476:15:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
451:11:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
428:10:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
403:10:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
385:09:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
366:02:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
619:significant coverage
79:Super Dog Rilienthal
71:Super Dog Rilienthal
615:Knowledge (XXG):GNG
613:: The criteria at
464:Anime News Network
321:
265:Weekly Shōnen Jump
604:
549:
368:
319:
307:
63:
682:
665:
600:
594:
592:
590:
546:
540:Talk to Nihonjoe
536:
532:
529:
523:kabushiki kaisha
461:
363:
353:
351:
349:
333:
327:
258:
257:
243:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
690:
689:
685:
684:
683:
681:
680:
679:
678:
672:deletion review
661:
605:
596:
585:
583:
544:
534:
527:
455:
369:
359:
344:
342:
331:
325:
200:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
688:
686:
677:
676:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
641:Knowledgekid87
634:
633:
593:
582:
581:
580:
570:Knowledgekid87
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
432:
431:
430:
388:
387:
352:
341:
340:
339:
309:
308:
261:
260:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
687:
675:
673:
669:
664:
658:
657:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
635:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
609:
608:
607:
606:
603:
599:
598:North America
591:
588:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
559:
552:
547:
545:Join WP Japan
541:
537:
530:
524:
520:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
483:SephyTheThird
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
459:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
438:
436:
433:
429:
425:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
395:SephyTheThird
392:
391:
390:
389:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
367:
364:
362:
357:
350:
347:
338:
334:
328:
322:
317:
314:
311:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:SephyTheThird
294:
289:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
277:SephyTheThird
272:
270:
269:World Trigger
266:
256:
252:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
206:
203:
202:Find sources:
198:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
662:
659:
618:
610:
584:
561:
411:. I checked
372:
360:
343:
312:
273:
262:
250:
244:
236:
229:
223:
217:
211:
201:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
623:WhisperToMe
468:WhisperToMe
420:WhisperToMe
377:WhisperToMe
227:free images
164:free images
505:Karasunoko
458:Karasunoko
443:Karasunoko
58:Sandstein
668:talk page
320:AngusWOOF
37:talk page
670:or in a
587:Relisted
346:Relisted
123:View log
39:or in a
611:Comment
497:natasha
373:Comment
313:Comment
233:WP refs
221:scholar
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
566:WP:GNG
562:Delete
205:Google
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
413:CiNii
332:sniff
248:JSTOR
209:books
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
645:talk
627:talk
574:talk
509:talk
487:talk
472:talk
447:talk
424:talk
399:talk
381:talk
356:ansh
326:bark
301:talk
295:. --
281:talk
241:FENS
215:news
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
528:日本穣
361:666
255:TWL
192:TWL
121:– (
647:)
629:)
576:)
542:·
538:·
535:投稿
531:·
511:)
489:)
474:)
449:)
426:)
401:)
383:)
335:)
329:•
303:)
283:)
235:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
643:(
625:(
572:(
548:!
507:(
485:(
470:(
460::
456:@
445:(
422:(
397:(
379:(
323:(
299:(
279:(
259:)
251:·
245:·
237:·
230:·
224:·
218:·
212:·
207:(
199:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.