439:- I think this page is extremely helpful. I have been following this project from the start and have always eagerly awaited new information about casting etc. It has my full support, I think the whole team of people involved should very proud. There are a lot of Superman fans out there who seem to only have negative things to say about anything related to Superman and still have the guts to call themselves fans. Surely if you're a fan you should support anything to do with the subject you're a fan of, not just beat down other peoples efforts to keep things alive. I say keep this page. For real fans of Superman it creates a great database of people to whom they will show their respect to, not beat down because they couldn't do any better.
276:- I don't care how much this movie seems to want to promote itself on Indie sites, it lacks any real independent sources and has a budget of $ 10k, all fan-raising on an indie film site. However...it may take off, and in which case, it will probably get smacked around for copyright violation pretty quickly, especially if they somehow successfully market it well enough that it gets independent coverage. Either way I'm pretty against it but I feel it should be given enough time to flop on it own before being deleted.
355:- The project commences filming in just a few weeks. As for promotion on indie sites, there has been very little self promotion, as all marketing has been limited to three press releases and two interviews - all other promotion is public interest. As for copyright violation, the project has been discussed at length with Warner Bros. and they are happy with it. I am able to supply documentation if required.
498:- this page even says it was submitted by a volunteer. I would wager that the "volunteer" is actually someone from the fan film's production. I could go through all of the other sources on there, but it's clear that they are not reliable. This page needs to be deleted, and only if there is actual real coverage of the completed product in a significant capacity (see
482:- I would love to know how a fan film could be notable before release (actually before filming, since it doesn't even claim to start filming until May or June), yet some of our high profile REAL films are not. Somehow, someone thinks this page is of the same notability as
586:- For those wondering how a fan-film could be notable before its release, the answer is that it would be notable the same way everything else generally is, and this is with significant coverage in reliable sources. In this case, there aren't any so it isn't notable. --
387:
Yes I am involved, and with respect we really don't need
Knowledge to promote it - promotion and public interest is high without needing Knowledge. If this is the case by all means delete it until it becomes more notable after release.
162:
196:
as, at this point, a non-notable fan film that has yet to begin production. There also may be a concern since this appeared whole cloth in one edit along with a bio of the "producer" that was speedied as a copyvio.
527:- Agree with BigNole. And this is just another case of someone making a film, then trying to use one of the largest websites to promote it. Everyone that is associated with the film have
557:
216:
156:
123:
329:
458:- Film is totally non notable at the moment, and even full studio pics (except the biggest) can't fully justify an article prior to production starting (
494:
is another fansite promoting a fan film. I cannot even find an 'About Us' section to determine what, if any, editorial oversight this page has.
462:). If it gets some real press coverage, maybe worth a try then. Hope it goes well anyway, I'd like to see it before DC/Warner get wind of it!
96:
91:
100:
83:
59:
177:
144:
17:
564:. The article should wait until it can be based on actual independent sources rather than PR and fan-driven information.
560:, I don't believe there is significant coverage in independent reliable sources -- a necessary criteria for avoiding
138:
635:
245:
36:
490:
appears to be a blog for the people making the film. I don't think self-published works establishes notability.
134:
634:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
620:
612:
595:
576:
546:
517:
472:
448:
423:
397:
382:
364:
344:
318:
286:
262:
248:
233:
Err... not deleted. It was "kept" per the AFD, and subsequently there was merging and retitling of the article.
228:
206:
65:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
87:
184:
470:
486:? Half of the sources are not even considered reliable for any other page, yet they are being used here?
444:
305:
and say it "might". Deletion at this point would ve without prejudice - the article could be resurrected
483:
459:
369:
And that begs a question: Are you directly involved in the fan film? If so this becomes a major case of
491:
79:
71:
495:
282:
238:
440:
605:
539:
389:
356:
258:
224:
170:
393:
360:
150:
567:
512:
464:
340:
302:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
419:
378:
314:
202:
556:- Agreed that this Knowledge article is premature. Despite the previous keep discussion at
591:
534:
499:
254:
220:
49:
561:
528:
411:
370:
301:
that it will then be notable. It fails that right now, and we shouldn't plug in the
503:
336:
117:
415:
374:
310:
277:
198:
587:
487:
410:
trying to use
Knowledge for your own benefit. I really suggest you read
406:
placing the unsourced information in other articles - it looks like you
373:, at best, or using Knowledge to in part promote the film, at worst. -
628:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
402:
You may not need it, but by creating the articles as you have -
297:
there will be more coverage aside from the self promotion.
215:- Suggest admin comparison to recently deleted version of
558:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Superman (film project)
234:
217:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Superman (film project)
113:
109:
105:
169:
603:. Whpq put it best, I have nothing more to add.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
638:). No further edits should be made to this page.
502:) should it even be considered for existence.
414:with regards to this and your other edits. -
183:
8:
328:Note: This debate has been included in the
293:There's a big issue with that though: That
327:
330:list of Film-related deletion discussions
7:
24:
253:Oops... Boy is my keyboard red.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
309:the film is later notable. -
655:
577:21:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
547:04:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
518:03:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
473:08:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
449:22:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
424:00:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
398:21:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
383:21:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
365:21:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
345:18:46, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
319:21:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
287:11:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
263:22:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
249:21:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
229:23:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
207:23:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
631:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
621:20:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
596:15:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
236:But no... not deleted.
66:04:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
484:The Dark Knight Rises
371:conflict of interest
61:Operation Big Bear
44:The result was
515:
510:
347:
333:
219:this discussion.
80:Superman: Requiem
72:Superman: Requiem
646:
633:
619:
615:
608:
575:
573:
570:
545:
542:
537:
513:
508:
504:
492:MaxwellReyes.com
467:
334:
290:
274:Conditional Keep
241:
188:
187:
173:
121:
103:
62:
56:
34:
654:
653:
649:
648:
647:
645:
644:
643:
642:
636:deletion review
629:
618:
613:
606:
604:
571:
568:
565:
562:No Future Films
540:
535:
532:
506:
465:
280:
239:
130:
94:
78:
75:
64:
60:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
652:
650:
641:
640:
624:
623:
610:
607:coccyx bloccyx
598:
580:
579:
550:
549:
521:
520:
496:ComicBookMovie
476:
475:
460:WP:CRYSTALBALL
452:
451:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
349:
348:
324:
323:
322:
321:
285:comment added
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
191:
190:
127:
74:
69:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
651:
639:
637:
632:
626:
625:
622:
617:
616:
609:
602:
599:
597:
593:
589:
585:
582:
581:
578:
574:
563:
559:
555:
552:
551:
548:
544:
543:
538:
530:
526:
523:
522:
519:
516:
511:
509:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
478:
477:
474:
471:
469:
468:
466:Benny Digital
461:
457:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
350:
346:
342:
338:
331:
326:
325:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:
288:
284:
279:
275:
272:
271:
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:
250:
247:
246:
243:
242:
235:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
195:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
57:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
630:
627:
611:
600:
583:
553:
533:
524:
514:(Contact me)
505:
479:
463:
455:
436:
407:
403:
352:
306:
303:crystal ball
298:
294:
273:
244:
237:
212:
193:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
281:—Preceding
157:free images
529:red links
488:Indiegogo
441:SuperLean
337:• Gene93k
255:Dru of Id
221:Dru of Id
53:Wizardman
614:(toccyx)
507:BIGNOLE
390:Supesfan
357:Supesfan
240:Schmidt,
124:View log
572:Writer
531:here. —
500:WP:NOTE
295:assumes
283:undated
213:Comment
163:WP refs
151:scholar
97:protect
92:history
601:Delete
584:Delete
569:Cactus
554:Delete
525:Delete
480:Delete
456:Delete
416:J Greb
412:WP:COI
388:Thanks
375:J Greb
311:J Greb
278:Crtrue
199:J Greb
194:Delete
135:Google
101:delete
46:delete
541:Allen
178:JSTOR
139:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
592:talk
588:Whpq
536:Mike
445:talk
437:Keep
420:talk
394:talk
379:talk
361:talk
353:Keep
341:talk
315:talk
259:talk
225:talk
203:talk
171:FENS
145:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
408:are
404:and
335:--
299:And
185:TWL
122:– (
594:)
566:—
447:)
422:)
396:)
381:)
363:)
343:)
332:.
317:)
307:if
261:)
227:)
205:)
165:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
48:.
590:(
443:(
418:(
392:(
377:(
359:(
339:(
313:(
289:.
257:(
223:(
201:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.