Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Supermarket tabloids in the United States - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

158:
By S. Elizabeth Bird Univ. of Tennessee Press, 1992, ISBN 0870497294/ There's also a full chapter on them in a standard work, Hachten, W. A. (2000). The troubles of journalism: A critical look at what's right and wrong with the press. L Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Took me 60 seconds
176:
I'm not saying it's non-notable, I'm saying it should be merged, but there is nothing to merge as the whole article needs a complete and thorough rewrite. Therefore, the page should just be deleted and a new section should be written at a place like
132:
This piece is unreferenced, strongly biased, and has no apparent ability for expansion. It is of such low quality that while it should be merged, the material would need to be completely rewritten. Therefore I am nominating with intent to
363:
The article covers a clearly notable topic, as demonstrated by book coverage and ample reporting in newspapers and magazines about the topic. While additional sourcing is needed, the article meets the notability standard.
92: 87: 96: 79: 125: 271:
Normally, an topic about which entire books have specifically been written is sufficient for an article of its own. AfD is not for merge discussions, in any case.
159:
on Google Books to find them. I suggest paying some attention to WP:BEFORE. It can be as easy to source an article as to nominate it for deletion without looking.
83: 75: 67: 451: 428: 398: 373: 348: 316: 282: 262: 233: 212: 190: 170: 145: 61: 297:
the appropriate place for commentators to opine as to the appropriate place for content—i.e., own article, nowhere, another article. See
17: 343: 311: 257: 302: 298: 49: 424: 466: 36: 465:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
229: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
305:. If you don't think this is the right way to go about things, try to build a consensus to change the guide. 412: 57: 338: 306: 252: 439: 392: 382: 225: 208: 200: 369: 186: 141: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420: 53: 334: 248: 447: 386: 204: 365: 324: 278: 203:
to this pretentious title, apparently thinking that it was a good idea. It wasn't.
166: 154:
and expand. Very notable subject, there's even an entire book on the exact subject:
182: 137: 181:. This is GFDL possible as the new section would copy nothing from the old page.-- 113: 416: 443: 273: 161: 242: 221: 178: 442:. The concept is notable and can be established through sourcing. -- 224:
but it seems apparent that this is a merge proposal not a proper AFD.
459:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
303:
Knowledge (XXG):Guide to deletion#Recommendations and outcomes
156:
For enquiring minds: a cultural study of supermarket tabloids
289:
While AfD may not be the appropriate place for an editor to
120: 109: 105: 101: 327:. Closing editor is free to interpret my !vote as a 351:(the reply is on my talk, not this page's talk--DGG) 245:. If it grows enough, it can be split off later. — 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 469:). No further edits should be made to this page. 293:an article in the hopes that it is merged, it 8: 220:I agree that this would be best merged with 199:Back in October, someone moved this from 76:Supermarket tabloids in the United States 68:Supermarket tabloids in the United States 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 299:Knowledge (XXG):Guide to deletion 381:- valid stub, but move back to 408:Major item under US culture. 1: 486: 452:16:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 429:09:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 399:20:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 374:16:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 349:05:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 317:06:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 283:19:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 263:14:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 234:07:28, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 213:23:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 191:22:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 171:22:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 146:19:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 62:00:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC) 462:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 440:Supermarket tabloid 383:Supermarket tabloid 201:supermarket tabloid 301:and in particular 44:The result was 438:and move back to 432: 415:comment added by 347: 261: 50:non-admin closure 477: 464: 431: 409: 397: 395: 389: 346: 341: 332: 314: 309: 260: 255: 246: 123: 117: 99: 34: 485: 484: 480: 479: 478: 476: 475: 474: 473: 467:deletion review 460: 410: 393: 387: 385: 339: 333: 312: 307: 253: 247: 119: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 483: 481: 472: 471: 455: 454: 433: 402: 401: 376: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 323:Will reply on 321: 320: 319: 266: 265: 236: 226:Colonel Warden 215: 174: 173: 130: 129: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 482: 470: 468: 463: 457: 456: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 407: 404: 403: 400: 396: 390: 384: 380: 377: 375: 371: 367: 362: 359: 358: 350: 345: 342: 336: 330: 326: 322: 318: 315: 310: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 280: 276: 275: 270: 269: 268: 267: 264: 259: 256: 250: 244: 240: 237: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195: 194: 193: 192: 188: 184: 180: 172: 168: 164: 163: 157: 153: 150: 149: 148: 147: 143: 139: 136: 127: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 461: 458: 435: 405: 378: 360: 328: 294: 290: 272: 238: 217: 196: 175: 160: 155: 151: 134: 131: 45: 43: 31: 28: 411:—Preceding 379:Strong Keep 218:Speedy Keep 54:Ron Ritzman 388:Jenuk1985 205:Mandsford 425:contribs 413:unsigned 366:Alansohn 126:View log 243:Tabloid 222:Tabloid 197:Comment 183:Ipatrol 179:Tabloid 138:Ipatrol 93:protect 88:history 417:Joe407 254:Yes? 135:delete 121:delete 97:delete 340:Yes? 313:matic 308:Bongo 291:bring 241:with 239:Merge 124:) – ( 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 448:talk 444:Whpq 436:Keep 421:talk 406:Keep 394:Talk 370:talk 361:Keep 335:Ched 329:Keep 325:talk 279:talk 249:Ched 230:talk 209:talk 187:talk 167:talk 152:Keep 142:talk 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 46:keep 274:DGG 162:DGG 48:. ( 450:) 427:) 423:• 391:| 372:) 344:© 337:: 331:— 295:is 281:) 258:© 251:: 232:) 211:) 189:) 169:) 144:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:) 446:( 419:( 368:( 277:( 228:( 207:( 185:( 165:( 140:( 128:) 118:( 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
non-admin closure
Ron Ritzman
talk
00:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Supermarket tabloids in the United States
Supermarket tabloids in the United States
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Ipatrol
talk
19:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
DGG
talk
22:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Tabloid
Ipatrol
talk
22:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
supermarket tabloid

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.