380:
to do so. I'd say that being the first to run is rather a poor claim on notability, as opposed to being the first elected. I would expect to see some significant coverage highlighting her as the first
Iranian-Canadian woman to run for public office before I'd accept that as a notable, and that
216:- That's a nice resume, but there is no coverage about her. I suppose the claim to be the first Iranian-Canadian woman to run for political office might be notable, but I can find no coverage about that, so it is apparently not considered notable. --
402:
which is a major
Canadian daily which identifies Sherry Shaghaghi as having unsuccessfully run for North Vancouver City council in 2005 which is prior to Salek's attempt in 2006. So even the one tenuous claim on notability is not true. --
155:
235:
261:
110:
287:
149:
399:
115:
467:
for office does not by itself support notability. In my opinion, had she been the first (insert non-mainstream ethnic group here) to
17:
83:
78:
476:
87:
170:
137:
70:
495:
36:
376:- The claim is not that she is the "first Iranian-Canadian" to run for office. The claim is that she is the first
339:
472:
494:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
131:
460:
191:
335:
127:
480:
451:
425:
412:
390:
368:
343:
320:
302:
276:
250:
225:
207:
52:
74:
177:
163:
66:
58:
364:
316:
298:
272:
246:
203:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
440:
331:
187:
445:
419:
356:
143:
408:
386:
221:
352:
359:
that she was the first
Iranian-Canadian on any ballot, then I might change my mind.
360:
312:
294:
268:
242:
195:
104:
49:
186:
Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail
404:
382:
217:
334:
because he refers to her as Ms. Salek, as if he knows her personally.
488:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
351:
per nom, fails notability as a politician. If it can be
471:
for office in Canada, that would pass the guideline. --
398:- After a bit of light scouring on the web, I've found
100:
96:
92:
162:
236:
176:
381:coverage is non-existent as far as I can tell. --
330:per nom, and it also seems the writer may have a
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
498:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
8:
288:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
282:
256:
230:
286:: This debate has been included in the
260:: This debate has been included in the
234:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
400:this blog entry on the Vancouver Sun
439:as insufficiently notable per the
24:
1:
515:
481:14:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
452:14:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
426:14:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
413:13:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
391:13:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
369:13:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
344:18:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
321:21:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
303:23:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
277:23:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
251:23:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
226:15:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
208:20:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
53:03:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
491:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
473:A More Perfect Onion
44:The result was
305:
291:
279:
265:
253:
239:
506:
493:
450:
424:
357:reliable sources
336:Rin tin tin 1996
292:
266:
240:
200:
181:
180:
166:
118:
108:
90:
34:
514:
513:
509:
508:
507:
505:
504:
503:
502:
496:deletion review
489:
469:win an election
444:
418:
196:
123:
114:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
512:
510:
501:
500:
484:
483:
454:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
417:Good catch! —
346:
324:
323:
306:
280:
254:
228:
184:
183:
120:
116:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
511:
499:
497:
492:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
461:WP:POLITICIAN
458:
455:
453:
449:
448:
442:
438:
435:
427:
423:
422:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
401:
397:
394:
393:
392:
388:
384:
379:
375:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
304:
300:
296:
289:
285:
281:
278:
274:
270:
263:
259:
255:
252:
248:
244:
237:
233:
229:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
199:
193:
192:WP:POLITICIAN
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
117:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
490:
487:
468:
464:
456:
446:
436:
420:
395:
377:
373:
348:
327:
308:
283:
257:
231:
213:
197:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
463:holds that
150:free images
67:Susan salek
59:Susan salek
447:Satori Son
421:Satori Son
295:• Gene93k
269:• Gene93k
243:• Gene93k
396:Addendum
353:verified
311:per nom.
111:View log
465:running
457:Comment
374:Comment
361:Bearian
332:WP: COI
313:4meter4
156:WP refs
144:scholar
84:protect
79:history
441:WP:GNG
437:Delete
349:Delete
328:Delete
309:Delete
214:Delete
198:ttonyb
188:WP:BIO
128:Google
88:delete
50:Jayjg
46:delete
378:woman
171:JSTOR
132:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
477:talk
443:. —
409:talk
405:Whpq
387:talk
383:Whpq
365:talk
340:talk
317:talk
299:talk
284:Note
273:talk
258:Note
247:talk
232:Note
222:talk
218:Whpq
204:talk
190:and
164:FENS
138:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
355:by
293:--
267:--
241:--
178:TWL
113:•
109:– (
479:)
459:-
411:)
389:)
367:)
342:)
319:)
301:)
290:.
275:)
264:.
249:)
238:.
224:)
206:)
194:.
158:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
475:(
407:(
385:(
363:(
338:(
315:(
297:(
271:(
245:(
220:(
202:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.