822:
requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." We could argue about whether this coverage is significant, since the article is about Daria, not Lewis. I think it probably is, and it does meet the other criteria. The problem is that a single source is usually
204:
A producer and co creator of a animated series. The series seems notable enough but it is difficult to see notability for this co-creator. The sources are very brief passing mentions. Althou her co-creation is notable, that notability is not inherited by its co-creator. She appears to keep a very
711:
I had asked about social media following because someone else on this page had mentioned her lower following on instagram as justification for deletion. I understand why these things are in question, but I feel that there are several reliable sources cited on her page at this time. She is notable
488:
Keep. While I am not a fan of her work. That fact that she won an Emmy and co-produced a very popular television show is enough to establish notability. In addition, she has been covered by the mainstream national press/ For example, these news organizations have covered her: The New York Times,
676:
claims about themselves to look more notable than they really are — musicians regularly call their current single a "hit" in their PR kits even though it hasn't actually charted anywhere that counts as a notability-conferring chart; writers regularly claim that their book was a "bestseller" just
492:
I have noticed that voice actresses are more likely to have their articles deleted than non-voice actresses. That is probably due to actresses connecting with the public in a greater way. It is kind of unfair to voice actresses though. With that being said, she doesn't have much of a
Twitter
906:
right there. She was a producer of one of the most successful and written-about shows of all time, and was the co-creator of a spinoff of that very show. Yes, the article needs to be fleshed out with more details on all three of those aspects of her notability, but that doesn't mean she isn't
586:
I'm not sure how the number of followers is gauged in relation to social media, but she is quite active on instagram and fairly so on twitter. There is a substantial IMDB profile for her. She is also on
Linkedin and many articles can be found there that mention her in relation to Daria's 20th
587:
anniversary this year. Why is media coverage discounted if it is not specifically about her? Are there pieces of information that I could remove from the page rather than the entire page being deleted? She is one of the most active women in production, voice acting, and writing.
223:
She is a producer and co creator of more than one animated series and she has won an emmy. The sources arent mentioned repeatedly because much of the information comes from the same source. She maintains a linkedin, instagram, and twitter regularly.
823:
not considered enough to establish notability. If you can find a half dozen more sources like that one, or one source in which Lewis is the subject, I think you could sway some of us. The other possibility is to establish notability under
326:
Many people have pages on wikipedia that do not have media coverage specifically about them, but the shows that they have contributed to. For example, Glenn
Eichler (other co-creator of Daria), Craig McCracken, and Lauren Faust.
173:
561:
380:. The fact that you can find some other articles which are contradicting something you've been told about how to improve this one does not mean this article is fine and has to be kept — it means
307:
780:
649:(e.g. erroneously conflating two different people who happen to have the same name.) And as for being "one of the most active women in production, voice acting, and writing", again,
514:
When I do that search, none of the first three pages of results is independent coverage (not just mention) of the subject by reliable sources. Can you point to some that are?
269:
She was co-producer for Beavis and Butt-head for 156 episodes, co-creator of Daria, supervising producer for Sea Rescue, as well as many other series listed on the page.
760:
424:
126:
641:. Having an IMDb profile doesn't assist notability either, because everybody who works in the film industry at all always has one — and because the content on IMDb is
167:
287:
696:
stuff about themselves that didn't have to be verified properly, then we'd have to keep an article about everybody who ever signed up for a Tumblr account.
351:
450:. I don't know enough about the subject matter to say, can anyone comment on this? I don't see any other possible notability criteria under either
474:
Delete - low personal notability, unworth a personal biography. a mention in her main article. Are there promotional or paid editing concerns?
490:
713:
133:
1003:- winning a Daytime Emmy meets the notability standards, independently of whatever "Daria" is. The article could use revision, though.
982:
ie. 1.The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times. (from
396:
until you pointed them out. So what I told you the first time still applies: the referencing needs to be improved with more evidence of
99:
94:
17:
103:
188:
800:
352:
https://mic.com/articles/173215/female-written-daria-was-groundbreaking-and-would-still-be-an-exception-today#.OpmFmGsIa
155:
86:
55:
799:
Ok, I think I understand. Thank you for your patience explaining this. What about this article linked in the page? (
874:
845:
534:
377:
1048:
479:
40:
803:) she and the other co-creator have quotes throughout, so they were both interviewed because of creating Daria.
432:
717:
149:
991:
315:
295:
1008:
912:
863:
572:
330:
Susie Lewis is notable because she was a female co-creator on a show that was "for girls" by MTV (Daria)
677:
because it sold ten copies on consignment at the local diner, and on and so forth. So what we require is
1044:
888:
738:
that something. Not "glancingly namechecked in other things", which is all that's been shown here — the
145:
36:
1029:
1012:
995:
966:
945:
916:
892:
865:
836:
812:
792:
772:
751:
721:
705:
616:
596:
579:
552:
523:
505:
483:
467:
436:
417:
369:
319:
299:
278:
260:
238:
218:
68:
832:
828:
612:
608:
519:
515:
475:
463:
459:
1025:
428:
195:
181:
804:
588:
361:
270:
230:
987:
824:
443:
311:
291:
978:
contribute to wp notability, afterall, followers can be bought, what does, is the winning of an
62:
1004:
941:
929:
908:
856:
808:
788:
768:
747:
701:
686:
592:
567:
413:
365:
274:
256:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1043:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
983:
933:
903:
884:
548:
501:
90:
251:
her, rather than just glancingly namechecking her existence in coverage of something else.
642:
408:
her — and those other articles do not constitute evidence that that's not necessary here.
974:, some editors above have referred to her number of followers on social media, this does
161:
1021:
956:
712:
because she is the co-producer of Daria and did production for Beavis and Butt-head.
621:
Followers on social media count for nothing toward notability — if a person isn't the
925:
819:
801:
http://variety.com/2017/tv/features/mtv-daria-cartoon-20-year-anniversary-1202000114/
638:
455:
451:
206:
937:
784:
764:
743:
697:
626:
409:
252:
212:
120:
678:
604:
544:
497:
82:
74:
685:
directly invested in the subject's own public relations bumf — if people could
979:
494:
1037:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
205:
low profile since further searches yield nothing better. Fails
877:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
848:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
562:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
537:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
489:
Variety, etc. Google is showing 64,400 results for her name.
924:- Even though there is not enough in depth coverage to meet
333:
She is quoted directly in the articles linked on this page.
730:
A person is notable for something if and when they're the
308:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
902:
This seems like a no-brainer. She's won an Emmy, passing
781:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
633:
number of followers on
Facebook or Twitter or Instagram
116:
112:
108:
180:
854:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
496:
And her
Facebook following appears to be nonexistent.
883:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
543:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
664:The reason we insist on reliable source coverage
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1051:). No further edits should be made to this page.
936:and that seems enough to justify keeping it. --
761:list of Television-related deletion discussions
425:list of Television-related deletion discussions
950:agree with above... her work plus the Emmy =
603:Have you not read our notability guidelines?
227:What changes could I make to avoid deletion?
194:
8:
779:Note: This debate has been included in the
759:Note: This debate has been included in the
560:Note: This debate has been included in the
423:Note: This debate has been included in the
306:Note: This debate has been included in the
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
778:
758:
559:
422:
305:
288:list of Women-related deletion discussions
285:
344:
661:that to be as true as you claim it is.
1020:How is an Emmy-winner not notable? --
7:
336:What other changes should be made?
247:Add some sources that are actually
742:, which hasn't been shown at all.
645:, it's far from rare for it to be
24:
932:that the Emmy is enough to meet
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
907:notable. Keep and improve.
1068:
866:23:06, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
837:21:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
813:18:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
793:02:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
773:02:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
752:05:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
722:16:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
706:10:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
617:19:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
607:is a good place to start.
597:18:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
580:22:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
553:21:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
524:23:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
506:23:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
484:19:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
468:13:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
446:point 3, as co-creator of
437:01:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
637:her from having to clear
418:16:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
404:her — not "quoting" her:
370:15:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
320:03:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
300:03:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
279:21:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
261:06:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
239:20:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
219:20:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
1040:Please do not modify it.
740:subject in her own right
668:a person is that people
629:coverage in media, then
442:She could possibly meet
32:Please do not modify it.
1030:19:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
1013:19:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
996:03:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
967:02:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
946:21:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
917:18:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
893:17:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
692:into Knowledge just by
392:, and just hadn't been
69:06:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
388:fine and have to be
378:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
734:of media coverage
895:
868:
795:
775:
582:
555:
439:
322:
302:
59:
56:non-admin closure
1059:
1042:
963:
882:
880:
878:
859:
853:
851:
849:
681:in sources that
653:source coverage
577:
575:
570:
542:
540:
538:
400:source coverage
354:
349:
217:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
67:
53:
34:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1049:deletion review
1038:
957:
928:, I agree with
896:
873:
871:
869:
857:
844:
842:
627:reliable source
573:
568:
566:
556:
533:
531:
476:Govindaharihari
359:
358:
357:
350:
346:
209:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1065:
1063:
1054:
1053:
1033:
1032:
1015:
998:
969:
948:
919:
881:
870:
852:
841:
840:
839:
797:
796:
776:
756:
755:
754:
714:143.43.146.225
709:
708:
662:
643:user-generated
619:
584:
583:
541:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
509:
508:
486:
471:
470:
440:
429:NewYorkActuary
420:
356:
355:
343:
342:
338:
324:
323:
303:
268:
266:
265:
264:
263:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1064:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1041:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
999:
997:
993:
989:
988:Coolabahapple
985:
981:
977:
973:
970:
968:
965:
964:
962:
961:
953:
949:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
920:
918:
914:
910:
905:
901:
898:
897:
894:
890:
886:
879:
876:
867:
864:
861:
860:
850:
847:
838:
834:
830:
826:
821:
818:
817:
816:
814:
810:
806:
802:
794:
790:
786:
782:
777:
774:
770:
766:
762:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
723:
719:
715:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
684:
680:
675:
671:
667:
663:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
601:
600:
598:
594:
590:
581:
578:
576:
571:
563:
558:
557:
554:
550:
546:
539:
536:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:articles are
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
371:
367:
363:
353:
348:
345:
341:
337:
334:
331:
328:
321:
317:
313:
312:Coolabahapple
309:
304:
301:
297:
293:
292:Coolabahapple
289:
284:
283:
282:
280:
276:
272:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
221:
220:
216:
215:
214:
208:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
65:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1039:
1036:
1017:
1005:Power~enwiki
1000:
975:
971:
959:
958:
955:
951:
930:CrispyGlover
921:
909:CrispyGlover
899:
872:
858:Juliancolton
855:
843:
798:
739:
735:
731:
710:
693:
689:
687:self-publish
682:
679:verification
673:
669:
665:
658:
654:
650:
646:
634:
630:
622:
585:
569:CAPTAIN RAJU
565:
532:
447:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
376:Please read
360:
347:
339:
335:
332:
329:
325:
267:
248:
229:
226:
222:
211:
210:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
63:
49:
47:
31:
28:
885:Kostas20142
825:WP:CREATIVE
657:her has to
444:WP:CREATIVE
168:free images
83:Susie Lewis
75:Susie Lewis
829:Kendall-K1
690:themselves
609:Kendall-K1
516:Kendall-K1
498:Dean Esmay
493:following.
460:Kendall-K1
340:References
1045:talk page
1022:Guy Macon
984:WP:ANYBIO
960:Gtstricky
934:WP:ANYBIO
904:WP:ANYBIO
827:point 3.
785:• Gene93k
765:• Gene93k
670:regularly
37:talk page
1047:or in a
875:Relisted
846:Relisted
815:eaw2600
724:eaw2600
694:claiming
674:inflated
651:reliable
599:eaw2600
535:Relisted
398:reliable
372:eaw2600
281:eaw2600
241:eaw2600
127:View log
39:or in a
938:Rogerx2
805:Eaw2600
744:Bearcat
732:subject
698:Bearcat
635:exempts
623:subject
589:Eaw2600
410:Bearcat
394:noticed
390:deleted
362:Eaw2600
271:Eaw2600
253:Bearcat
231:Eaw2600
213:Velella
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
926:WP:GNG
820:WP:GNG
683:aren't
639:WP:GNG
545:Kurykh
456:WP:BIO
452:WP:GNG
207:WP:GNG
146:Google
104:delete
1018:Keep:
672:make
666:about
655:about
647:wrong
448:Daria
406:about
402:about
382:those
249:about
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
1026:talk
1009:talk
1001:Keep
992:talk
980:Emmy
972:Keep
952:Keep
942:talk
922:Keep
913:talk
900:Keep
889:talk
833:talk
809:talk
789:talk
769:talk
748:talk
718:talk
702:talk
659:show
613:talk
605:WP:N
593:talk
549:talk
520:talk
502:talk
480:talk
464:talk
433:talk
414:talk
366:talk
316:talk
296:talk
275:talk
257:talk
235:talk
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
64:Yash
50:keep
976:not
954:er
736:for
625:of
574:(✉)
454:or
386:not
196:TWL
125:– (
52:.
1028:)
1011:)
994:)
986:)
944:)
915:)
891:)
862:|
835:)
811:)
791:)
783:.
771:)
763:.
750:)
720:)
704:)
631:no
615:)
595:)
564:.
551:)
522:)
504:)
482:)
466:)
458:.
435:)
427:.
416:)
368:)
318:)
310:.
298:)
290:.
277:)
259:)
237:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
60:—
1024:(
1007:(
990:(
940:(
911:(
887:(
831:(
807:(
787:(
767:(
746:(
716:(
700:(
611:(
591:(
547:(
518:(
500:(
478:(
462:(
431:(
412:(
364:(
314:(
294:(
273:(
255:(
233:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.