441:
an actual problem) is with an enthusiastic editor creating an article about a subject about which they seem to be truly passionate. This passion has led their writing to have a bit of an advertorial feel, but this can be easily fixed. Based upon these facts, I suggest
128:
Despite a New York Times-linked article as a reference, this article is little more than a commercial for TRX. Unless someone wants to rewrite the article to focus solely on the exericse without hyping the corporate sponsor, I would have to say this
238:
The subject appears to be Wiki-standard; it is the presentation that lets this down. Is there an objective review of this, from a sports physiology source, perhaps, that could be used to ground it in analysis rather than advertising language ? --
306:'s version is far superior; but the more neutrality you apply to the text, the more this looks like a generic trademark name for an exercise regimen that makes no particular claim of notability or strong differentiation from its competitors. -
184:
ok, I added more content for suspension training, I have to leave TRX and fitness anywhere in it since they invented suspension training. Without it, it's like talking about greatest
Olympian without mentioning Michael Phelps.
402:
towards keep. I declined the speedy on this one, and added the NYT reference. I was going to continue to see if this was viable, but decided to go offline instead. Not to a gym, just to a different
121:
437:
This article has some major issues with style, format, etc. However, there are no problems with notability or verifiability at all. The only "problem" (and it's definitely
509:- I have updated with (I hope) a more NPOV version (with proponents and critics represented). Therefore the above comments may not still be relevant. I think it meets
410:
editor, but I think it just might be notable. I very much like
Trulyblue's draft more than this one, they can easily be merged. In fact, Trulyblue, be
332:
88:
83:
339:. I'll see what I can do to improve the quality of the article (I haven't seen the inside of a gym in years) but I'd argue that this passes both
92:
406:
like most
Wikipedians I presume. Gazimoff's references are very good, seem independent. Yes, this was added from a new editor, presumable a
480:
446:
75:
17:
200:
513:, given the number of google hits (OK, that's not exactly scientific, but it's been covered in various newspapers also).
258:"Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. "
573:
36:
555:
539:
522:
501:
467:
432:
390:
362:
315:
292:
269:
248:
228:
204:
177:
142:
57:
280:
414:
and do it! You are allowed to update the article while the debate runs. In fact, I just gutted the good faith
372:
324:
572:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
496:
462:
79:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
336:
328:
244:
510:
188:
491:
457:
424:
530:. I don't see any major problems with the article as it stands now; it certainly isn't an advertisement.
551:
224:
196:
138:
518:
288:
265:
71:
63:
427:
383:
355:
240:
170:
219:
territory. I am sorry, but in its current form this does not meet
Knowledge (XXG) standards.
535:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
411:
152:
130:
311:
476:
407:
547:
220:
192:
134:
415:
216:
260:
Yes, a fundamental re-write is needed, and therefore this falls under speedy deletion.
514:
303:
284:
261:
344:
340:
419:
378:
350:
164:
283:
of the article. Maybe this isn't the right forum, but does this look encylopedic?
531:
49:
109:
307:
475:
I moved the article to a more appropriate name, per the naming conventions at
403:
158:
546:
I removed one reference that linked to the TRX promotional page.
566:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
444:
keeping the article, and assisting in cleaning it up a bit.
302:. The current version is strongly inappropriate in tone.
116:
105:
101:
97:
418:
out of it, as it wasn't helping this debate at all.
48:. Article is now referenced and no longer spam. --
256:- the criteria for speedy deletion of spam state:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
576:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
155:more of an ad then an informative article.--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
323:- Sources can be found in the
1:
556:00:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
540:18:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
523:18:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
502:17:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
468:17:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
433:15:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
391:14:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
363:14:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
316:14:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
293:09:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
270:08:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
249:07:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
229:00:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
215:Now the article veers into
205:23:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
178:23:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
143:23:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
58:09:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
593:
569:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
151:- Either delete it per
133:candidate needs to go.
375:as well. Many thanks,
281:this draft re-write
72:Suspension Training
64:Suspension Training
44:The result was
489:
482:
455:
448:
279:I have developed
207:
191:comment added by
584:
571:
483:
481:
449:
447:
430:
426:
422:
404:sitting position
386:
381:
358:
353:
321:Keep but Cleanup
186:
173:
167:
161:
119:
113:
95:
34:
592:
591:
587:
586:
585:
583:
582:
581:
580:
574:deletion review
567:
488:
454:
428:
420:
384:
379:
356:
351:
308:Smerdis of Tlön
171:
169:
165:
159:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
590:
588:
579:
578:
561:
559:
558:
543:
542:
525:
504:
484:
470:
450:
435:
396:
395:
394:
393:
366:
365:
325:New York Times
318:
296:
295:
273:
272:
251:
241:Simon Cursitor
232:
231:
209:
208:
181:
180:
163:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
589:
577:
575:
570:
564:
563:
562:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
503:
500:
499:
495:
494:
490:
487:
478:
474:
473:Further note:
471:
469:
466:
465:
461:
460:
456:
453:
445:
440:
436:
434:
431:
423:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
392:
389:
388:
387:
382:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
364:
361:
360:
359:
354:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
237:
234:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
183:
182:
179:
176:
175:
174:
168:
162:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
132:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
568:
565:
560:
527:
506:
497:
492:
485:
472:
463:
458:
451:
443:
438:
399:
377:
376:
373:The Guardian
371:Add to that
349:
348:
337:Military.com
320:
299:
276:
257:
253:
235:
212:
157:
156:
148:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
187:—Preceding
548:Ecoleetage
511:notability
333:Daily Mail
221:Ecoleetage
193:Grantgrant
135:Ecoleetage
515:TrulyBlue
329:The Times
304:TrulyBlue
285:TrulyBlue
262:TrulyBlue
201:contribs
189:unsigned
122:View log
532:GregorB
507:Comment
498:Jameson
464:Jameson
400:Comment
277:Comment
236:Comment
213:Comment
153:WP:SPAM
131:WP:SPAM
89:protect
84:history
50:PeaceNT
477:WP:MOS
421:Keeper
408:WP:COI
300:Delete
254:Delete
149:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
416:WP:OR
217:WP:OR
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
552:talk
536:talk
528:Keep
519:talk
493:D.J.
459:D.J.
412:bold
385:moff
380:Gazi
357:moff
352:Gazi
345:WP:N
343:and
341:WP:V
335:and
312:talk
289:talk
266:talk
245:talk
225:talk
197:talk
139:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
439:not
554:)
538:)
521:)
486:D.
479:.
452:D.
429:76
347:.
331:,
327:,
314:)
291:)
268:)
247:)
227:)
203:)
199:•
141:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
550:(
534:(
517:(
425:ǀ
310:(
287:(
264:(
243:(
223:(
195:(
172:X
166:R
160:S
137:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.