439:, which are not necessarily notable. That this journal was indexed for only 1 year is not much of a problem, I think. It's not like it was delisted by MEDLINE or something like that, indexing stopped simply because the journal folded. Both the journal and the society have histories independent of van Pelt, so I don't think that merging them there is appropriate. The histories of the journal and society, however, do overlap, so merging the society into the journal article makes most sense to me. --
504:
As for Dr. van Pelt himself, his work does not seem to have lasted the test of time and he has not left enough of a legacy. van Pelt appears not have be adequately notable per the appropriate notability criteria. As an alumnus of the Sydney
Medical School, he does not appear to be recorded in the
550:
because virtually nothing in the article is verified. Of the three references listed, the first is impossible to evaluate, being both offline and in a foreign language; the second is a dead link; and the third does not appear to mention the subject at all that I could find. I don't doubt that he
500:
is that medical libraries and other academic libraries do not carry this journal, either as hard-copy versions or e-journals. In fact, in order to determine whether this was notable, I had to go out of my way to hunt down issues of this journal. Further, this isn't a journal with any significant
551:
existed and so on, and I recognize the difficulty of finding sources for someone of his generation - but I need to see some supporting evidence for the notability claims like "pioneer of modern medical hypnosis and hypnotherapy". I am open to changing my opinion if verification can be found. --
492:
Whether or not a journal is indexed by MEDLINE/PubMed/Ovid/WoK/WoS/G Scholar/whatever shouldn't in and of itself be a sign of a journal's notability or lack thereof, in the case of those that aren't indexed. However, these do roughly indicate whether a journal may be notable enough.
485:, with a question: So is the idea to keep the article and improve it, then? Whether or not the answer to that is a yes, I have sincere and serious questions about having three, let alone this one article or an article composed of the three articles. For what it's worth,
416:
Looks like one good source (Gravitz, Melvin (1987)). Still believe Van Pelt, his
Society and his Journal would be notable as a single article, harder to justify three articles. No information would be lost combining and maintain redirects. --
169:
594:, as notability for the subject seems difficult to establish. The content can always be split out as and when appropriate sources are found. Deletion wouldn't be helpful, as it's a plausible search term.
435:
That remark in NJournals is because many people equate PuBMed and MEDLINE. The latter is selective, but the former contains not only MEDLINE-indexed journals, but also journals that are in
569:
P.S. Search of Google Books and Google
Scholar confirms that he wrote books; nothing else. If he was such a pioneer, wouldn't you think somebody would have written ABOUT him somewhere? --
347:
of the articles on the society and the journal into this bio, although I don't have a problem with merging the society article into the journal article (but not the other way around). --
163:
122:
249:
234:
264:
219:
129:
95:
90:
99:
82:
591:
293:
288:
505:
School's annals, which is further suggestive of his lack of having made enough of a mark to be included on
Knowledge. --Qwerty Binary (
501:
readership and isn't particularly well cited, even in its area of academic rigour. Its contributors do not, in fact, number that many.
308:
303:
I know, hypnotism, but this was taken seriously for a time as a medical treatment and he helped pioneer it, according to this source.
184:
151:
631:
article appears to meet WP:ACADEMIC. Nothing too puffy in the article either, unlike many of these borderline academic cases. -
17:
145:
640:
623:
606:
578:
560:
538:
510:
466:
448:
426:
400:
374:
356:
327:
271:
256:
241:
226:
211:
64:
614:
there are enough reliable sources here... Not having sources on-line in
English is not a valid deletion criterion.
86:
141:
659:
40:
462:
422:
370:
323:
191:
506:
207:
489:
as a page is very poorly done, especially with its treatment of its medical uses, legitimacy, or efficacy.
619:
318:(07 Aug 1954, "Asthma Laid to Tensions"). For anyone searching most results found as "S. J. van Pelt". --
655:
534:
297:
268:
253:
238:
223:
78:
70:
36:
444:
396:
352:
458:
418:
410:
388:
366:
319:
177:
157:
413:, not an automatic notability. And only 1 year's (volume) of the journal were indexed (out of 17).
636:
574:
556:
336:
615:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
654:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
530:
519:
304:
602:
440:
392:
348:
340:
436:
55:
632:
570:
552:
204:
This same page created across other wikis (e.g., es.wiki) isn't a good sign either.
116:
414:
457:
OK good enough. I've change my vote to Keep and worry about merge elsewhere. --
597:
522:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
486:
384:
312:
648:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
409:
It was in
Medline but no longer. Some caveats about Medline in
112:
108:
104:
176:
314:. He was called a "leading medical hypnotist" in the
202:
SPA editor doesn't exactly instill confidence either.
529:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
387:, a rather selective database and therefore meets
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
662:). No further edits should be made to this page.
250:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
235:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
190:
8:
265:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
248:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
218:Note: This debate has been included in the
220:list of People-related deletion discussions
262:
247:
232:
217:
365:How determine the journal is notable? --
592:British Society of Medical Hypnotists
294:British Society of Medical Hypnotists
7:
498:British Journal of Medical Hypnotism
289:British Journal of Medical Hypnotism
309:The American Journal of Psychology
24:
306:One of his books was reviewed in
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
641:04:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
624:00:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
607:10:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
65:06:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
579:22:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
561:22:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
539:00:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
511:10:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
496:My main complaint with the
467:02:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
449:19:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
427:18:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
401:17:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
383:The journal was indexed in
375:14:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
357:13:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
328:05:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
272:16:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
257:16:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
242:16:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
227:16:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
212:14:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
679:
651:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
206:Cheers. Qwerty Binary (
343:of a notable journal.
298:Sydney James Van Pelt
79:Sydney James Van Pelt
71:Sydney James Van Pelt
48:The result was
541:
301:
274:
259:
244:
229:
63:
670:
653:
600:
528:
524:
283:
269:Northamerica1000
254:Northamerica1000
239:Northamerica1000
224:Northamerica1000
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
678:
677:
673:
672:
671:
669:
668:
667:
666:
660:deletion review
649:
595:
517:
341:editor-in-chief
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
676:
674:
665:
664:
644:
643:
626:
609:
584:
583:
582:
581:
564:
563:
544:
543:
542:
526:
525:
514:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
459:Green Cardamom
452:
451:
437:PubMed Central
430:
429:
419:Green Cardamom
404:
403:
378:
377:
367:Green Cardamom
360:
359:
345:Oppose merging
330:
320:Green Cardamom
316:New York Times
276:
275:
260:
245:
230:
205:
203:
201:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
675:
663:
661:
657:
652:
646:
645:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
625:
621:
617:
613:
610:
608:
604:
599:
593:
589:
586:
585:
580:
576:
572:
568:
567:
566:
565:
562:
558:
554:
549:
546:
545:
540:
536:
532:
527:
523:
521:
516:
515:
513:
512:
508:
502:
499:
494:
490:
488:
484:
468:
464:
460:
456:
455:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
431:
428:
424:
420:
415:
412:
408:
407:
406:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
311:
310:
305:
302:
299:
295:
291:
290:
286:
281:
278:
277:
273:
270:
266:
261:
258:
255:
251:
246:
243:
240:
236:
231:
228:
225:
221:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
650:
647:
628:
616:Technical 13
611:
587:
547:
518:
503:
497:
495:
491:
482:
481:
411:WP:NJournals
389:WP:NJournals
344:
332:
315:
307:
287:
284:
282:
279:
200:Not notable.
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
531:Mark Arsten
337:WP:ACADEMIC
164:free images
441:Randykitty
393:Randykitty
349:Randykitty
58:Sandstein
656:talk page
629:Weak Keep
487:hypnotism
37:talk page
658:or in a
633:Drdisque
571:MelanieN
553:MelanieN
520:Relisted
123:View log
39:or in a
483:Comment
385:MEDLINE
339:as the
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
548:Delete
335:Meets
142:Google
100:delete
598:Trevj
588:Merge
296:into
285:Merge
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
637:talk
620:talk
612:Keep
603:talk
575:talk
557:talk
535:talk
507:talk
463:talk
445:talk
423:talk
397:talk
391:. --
371:talk
353:talk
333:Keep
324:talk
292:and
280:Keep
208:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
596:--
590:to
192:TWL
121:– (
639:)
622:)
605:)
577:)
559:)
537:)
509:)
465:)
447:)
425:)
399:)
373:)
355:)
326:)
267:.
252:.
237:.
222:.
210:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
635:(
618:(
601:(
573:(
555:(
533:(
461:(
443:(
421:(
395:(
369:(
351:(
322:(
300:.
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.