474:
collection of articles about her, which I'd be quoting from and using to improve the article??? Or do you think that everyone who supports the career of a lesser-known artist or performer must automatically be related to them, because that's the impression I get from some of the comments which have been made towards me?? (It's true that I AM distantly related to a currently-working
British stage and TV actor, but it isn't her, and I haven't contributed to any Knowledge article about them - if they even have one, as I've never checked to see - so there's no conflict of interest or hidden agenda here...) As for the link I included, that's just meant as an example to show that, despite what some may contend, information can be found online to confirm at least some of the details about her career, and on websites which may qualify as reliable sources under Knowledge guidelines - which gives a lie to those above claiming otherwise... And that link shows that there's scope for further research NOW, which may help to improve the article to the point where notability is established beyond doubt and it reaches the standards required. I haven't examined all of the links I found, as I don't have time right now, but it shows that there's information out there on places other than her official site or IMDb which needs to be carefully examined and followed up before any decision is taken on whether this article is deleted.
361:
OWN, as incorrectly stated above, but rather the OCR of an Andrew Lloyd Webber show and one produced by the London
Philharmonic, and so are not specifically hers and the associated notes in the packaging would not be written with any specific bias towards her). Has also had lead roles in major West End musicals and other stage and TV productions, which are facts of note. Additionally, the most recent positive editor has stated that they are attempting to track down further supporting references to add to the article. To that effect, this article should be retained in order to allow them to find those references.
31:
452:
her, and doesn't say anything other than that she'll be appearing in that play. You're presenting the appearance of being a member of her family; can you recall anyone writing a newspaper or magazine article about her, or a book? Have there been reporters around the house interviewing her who might
394:
are allowed as references here on
Knowledge! Of course, such searches are more time-consuming than the lazy way of just typing keywords into Google and seeing what comes out, because you have to go out of your house to something called a "library" and look in strange objects called "books"... And if
360:
Contrary to the claims made above, two sources WERE provided in the most recent positive edit, although they need to be correctly referenced (Not sure at the moment how you reference information which comes from documentation included with CDs - And please note that the two CDs mentioned are not HER
429:
I think you need to learn the difference between insults and sarcasm... And, as a matter of fact, I've just done another Google search (can't do a library search right now, as I'm in the UK and they're all shut as it's the middle of the night here!). If you search for "Sydney Rae White" and go past
473:
How the hell would I know that? - I've got no personal or professional connection to her at all, despite what you may think! All I know about her is what I can find online or from other published sources. Think about it for a second - If I was connected with her, don't you think I'd have a list or
577:("Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, or other productions"), the fact that she's had significant roles in notable productions does establish notability for her too, and so justifies this article being retained.
573:- She's had featured lead roles in various productions in major West End (London, UK) theatres. She's also appeared in a featured role on the original cast recording of an Andrew Lloyd Webber musical and in other productions. Going by what's written at
323:- just another child star in the local iteration of a minor Disney franchise, and not even reliably sourced for that. Seems to be a bit of an ad for the school she attended, too (three mentions, two wiki-linked, in one short article). --
205:
378:
Could someone do a LexisNexis search? I would be very surprised if 2 lead roles (the rock opera and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang) in London West End musicals didn't receive some paper coverage. -
409:
So, after you made this post insulting people for not doing this kind of search, I assume that you actually did the search yourself. Did you find any useful references when you did it? -
169:; only sources are from her own CDs and by article creator's own admission, her IMDB profile which was written by her manager and her own website. Was CSDed and declined; was PRODed by
496:
Not only can, but done. Search for her name, past ten years and searching all available resources: "No
Documents Found". Searched for "Sydney White" as well, but all results were for
531:
236:
154:
434:) to her being one of the main cast in the very latest 2009 production of 'Quadrophenia' - I guess that helps establish a bit more notability for her, doesn't it??...
269:
discussing her in that part, either. If the information in the article can't be verified by reliable sources, then there's nothing to say about her on
Knowledge. -
40:
173:
on the 14th with note of: "Unsourced article about non-notable actress who has attracted (apparently) zero attention" and removed by SPA IP
344:
121:
116:
177:
with note of "Expanded article and added intial references - more to follow soon (I hope!))" though no actual references were added. --
125:
515:
252:
221:
190:
667:
627:
463:
419:
279:
108:
390:
An excellent point - I sometimes think that a lot of users and editors here forget that other sources apart from online ones exist
599:
591:
578:
17:
502:(quite a few if anyone happens to be working on that article) Screen shot available if someone disbelieves it. --
649:
65:
46:
395:
she's in a lead role, there's a good chance of her being mentioned by name in some of the reviews, isn't there?
648:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
613:. But the section at the top, 'basic criteria,' requires that those achievements be verifiable by coverage in
348:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
632:
586:
565:
543:
519:
483:
468:
443:
424:
404:
385:
370:
352:
335:
313:
301:
284:
256:
225:
194:
90:
509:
383:
311:
246:
215:
184:
265:
Her best claim seems to be her role as Emma in the UK version of "As the Bell Rings," but I can't find any
595:
582:
479:
439:
400:
366:
297:
623:
574:
459:
415:
275:
166:
112:
503:
240:
209:
178:
539:
330:
174:
86:
553:
379:
307:
431:
475:
435:
396:
362:
293:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
343:
She has appeared in three major West End productions and has had a lead role on a TV series.
618:
561:
454:
410:
270:
104:
96:
535:
324:
170:
430:
the first couple of pages, you'll find several probably usable references(for example,
82:
661:
610:
162:
614:
498:
266:
306:
That is only a reason if such sources cannot be found with a reasonable search. -
142:
557:
556:. Actress has had significant roles in notable film, TV and stage productions.
78:
642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
206:
list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions
149:
138:
134:
130:
532:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
652:). No further edits should be made to this page.
448:That article mentions her, but it isn't really
237:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
231:
200:
453:have written about her in more detail? -
235:: This debate has been included in the
204:: This debate has been included in the
530:: This debate has been included in the
45:For an explanation of the process, see
615:multiple independent reliable sources
7:
24:
41:deletion review on 2009 April 24
29:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
609:Yes, that's a subcategory of
81:arising from this discussion
607:Notice the top of that page
77:. Insufficient evidence of
684:
633:00:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
617:. Are you aware of any? -
587:00:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
566:22:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
544:00:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
520:20:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
484:01:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
469:21:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
444:21:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
425:20:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
405:20:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
386:19:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
371:16:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
353:14:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
336:14:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
314:19:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
302:14:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
285:13:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
257:13:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
226:13:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
195:13:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
91:13:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
161:Unnotable actress; fails
47:Knowledge:Deletion review
668:Pages at deletion review
645:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
600:few or no other edits
552:- Meets criteria for
602:outside this topic.
73:The result was
603:
546:
259:
228:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
675:
647:
631:
589:
526:
506:
467:
423:
333:
327:
283:
267:reliable sources
243:
212:
181:
152:
146:
128:
105:Sydney Rae White
97:Sydney Rae White
63:
33:
32:
26:
683:
682:
678:
677:
676:
674:
673:
672:
658:
657:
656:
650:deletion review
643:
621:
504:
457:
413:
331:
325:
273:
241:
210:
179:
175:User:84.65.38.7
171:User:Orangemike
148:
119:
103:
100:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
681:
679:
671:
670:
660:
659:
655:
654:
638:
637:
636:
635:
575:WP:Entertainer
568:
547:
524:
523:
522:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
373:
355:
345:209.247.22.164
338:
318:
317:
316:
287:
260:
229:
167:WP:ENTERTAINER
159:
158:
99:
94:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
680:
669:
666:
665:
663:
653:
651:
646:
640:
639:
634:
629:
625:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
604:
601:
597:
593:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
569:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
548:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
511:
507:
501:
500:
495:
485:
481:
477:
472:
471:
470:
465:
461:
456:
451:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
433:
428:
427:
426:
421:
417:
412:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
393:
389:
388:
387:
384:
381:
377:
374:
372:
368:
364:
359:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
337:
334:
328:
322:
319:
315:
312:
309:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
286:
281:
277:
272:
268:
264:
261:
258:
254:
251:
248:
244:
238:
234:
230:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
176:
172:
168:
164:
156:
151:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
98:
95:
93:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
644:
641:
606:
570:
549:
527:
512:
505:Collectonian
499:Sydney White
497:
476:Emma white20
449:
436:Emma white20
397:Emma white20
391:
375:
363:Emma white20
357:
340:
320:
294:Darrenhusted
292:no sources.
289:
262:
249:
242:Collectonian
232:
218:
211:Collectonian
201:
187:
180:Collectonian
160:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
619:FisherQueen
598:) has made
571:Strong keep
554:WP:CREATIVE
455:FisherQueen
411:FisherQueen
358:Strong keep
326:Orange Mike
271:FisherQueen
592:84.65.38.7
579:84.65.38.7
536:Erwin85Bot
79:notability
376:Question:
341:Weak keep
83:Fritzpoll
662:Category
628:contribs
516:contribs
464:contribs
420:contribs
280:contribs
253:contribs
222:contribs
191:contribs
155:View log
263:Delete.
239:. — --
208:. — --
122:protect
117:history
611:WP:BIO
558:Untick
321:Delete
290:Delete
163:WP:BIO
150:delete
126:delete
75:delete
450:about
153:) – (
143:views
135:watch
131:links
16:<
624:talk
596:talk
583:talk
562:talk
550:Keep
540:talk
534:. --
528:Note
510:talk
480:talk
460:talk
440:talk
432:here
416:talk
401:talk
367:talk
349:talk
332:Talk
298:talk
276:talk
247:talk
233:Note
216:talk
202:Note
185:talk
165:and
139:logs
113:talk
109:edit
87:talk
392:and
380:Mgm
329:|
308:Mgm
664::
626:·
590:—
585:)
564:)
542:)
518:)
482:)
462:·
442:)
418:·
403:)
369:)
351:)
300:)
278:·
255:)
224:)
193:)
141:|
137:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
89:)
43:.
630:)
622:(
594:(
581:(
560:(
538:(
513:·
508:(
478:(
466:)
458:(
438:(
422:)
414:(
399:(
382:|
365:(
347:(
310:|
296:(
282:)
274:(
250:·
245:(
219:·
214:(
188:·
183:(
157:)
147:(
145:)
107:(
85:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.